Hälsa i vårdande gemenskap : gemenskapens betydelse för äldre

The aim of the study and research questions: The aim of this study is to illuminate how caring communion can aid in promoting health as becoming in elderly people in the context of natural caring. The target group of the study consists of elderly citizens living at home. The focus of this thesis is on the concept of communion and how caring communion can affect the inner health resources in a patient’s inner health domain, as well as how caring communion can support health as becoming and inner health resources in the elderly. The main research questions of this study are the following: 1) what does communion mean? 2) what does caring communion mean? 3) what is the connection between caring communion and health? Theoretical perspective: The theoretical perspective of this qualitative study relies on the caritative caring theory as developed by scholars of caring sciences at the Åbo Academi University’s Vasa unit. The caritas motive is based on an ethos built on a consideration of togetherness, i.e. caring communion, a place where one feels at home and where one can be the person one was meant to be. Methodology: A hermeneutic research approach based on Gadamer (1997) permeates the study. This entails that understanding and interpretation become central. The study conducted in the thesis is divided into three sub-studies. Sub-study one and two are based on ontological determination whereas the third sub-study is carried out by contextual determination. The first sub-study is conducted by etymological and semantic analysis of the concept of communion (gemenskap) based on Koort (1975) and the second sub-study by determining the basic epistemological category of the concept based on Eriksson (2010b). Sub-study three is conducted through content analysis of 18 multidisciplinary and 13 caring science articles and dissertations based on Kvale (2009). The aim in the third sub-study is to define caring communions in various contexts of meaning based on Eriksson´s model of conceptual determination (2010b). All studies are interpreted through hermeneutic interpretation where the continuous movement from a part of a whole, to the whole, to part again, leads to new understanding. Finally, the findings from all the three sub-studies are compared to the concepts of pre-understanding and the inner-health-domain model of Wärnås (2002). Results: The results of the study offer a description of the dimensions of caring communion and a model that illuminates how caring communion can further health as becoming. The fundamentals of caring communion rest on the idea of a human being’s absolute right to dignity as a base for communion. The concept of communion contains a moral, an ethical, and a spiritual component. In communion, there exists a moral and ethical responsibility and a willingness to commit oneself. The individual is part of a connection or relation and knows the aim and course for the communion. A caring connection, a caring culture, a caring atmosphere and caring listening are characteristics of caring communion. In caring communion, the elderly feel trusting and see themselves as unique, powerful, and valuable. The model demonstrates that when the elderly are able to rest in caring communion, the virtues of courage and faith become strong and desire for life awaken within the elderly and health as becoming becomes possible. Conclusions: The outcome of the study is that all communion is not necessarily caring communion. In order for communion to be caring and for the elderly to achieve health as becoming, there are certain criteria that must be met. This is especially important when designing activities for the elderly in the context of natural caring.

Collectiveness within startup teams – Leading the way to initiating and managing collective pursuit of opportunities in organizational contexts

While traditional entrepreneurship literature addresses the pursuit of entrepreneurial opportunities to a solo entrepreneur, scholars increasingly agree that new ventures are often founded and operated by entrepreneurial teams as collective efforts especially in hightechnology industries. Researchers also suggest that team ventures are more likely to survive and succeed than ventures founded by the individual entrepreneur although specific challenges might relate to multiple individuals being involved in joint entrepreneurial action. In addition to new ventures, entrepreneurial teams are seen central for organizing work in established organizations since the teams are able to create major product and service innovations that drive organizational success. Acknowledgement of the entrepreneurial teams in various organizational contexts has challenged the notion on the individual entrepreneur. However, considering that entrepreneurial teams represent a collective-level phenomenon that bases on interactions between organizational members, entrepreneurial teams may not have been studied as indepth as could be expected from the point of view of the team-level, rather than the individual or the individuals in the team. Many entrepreneurial team studies adopt the individualized view of entrepreneurship and examine the team members’ aggregate characteristics or the role of a lead entrepreneur. The previous understandings might not offer a comprehensive and indepth enough understanding of collectiveness within entrepreneurial teams and team venture performance that often relates to the team-level issues in particular. In addition, as the collective-level of entrepreneurial teams has been approached in various ways in the existing literatures, the phenomenon has been difficult to understand in research and practice. Hence, there is a need to understand entrepreneurial teams at the collective-level through a systematic and comprehensive perspective. This study takes part in the discussions on entrepreneurial teams. The overall objective of this study is to offer a description and understanding of collectiveness within entrepreneurial teams beyond individual(s). The research questions of the study are: 1) what collectiveness within entrepreneurial teams stands for, what constitutes the basic elements of it, and who are included in it, 2) why, how, and when collectiveness emerges or reinforces within entrepreneurial teams, and 3) why collectiveness within entrepreneurial teams matters and how it could be developed or supported. In order to answer the above questions, this study bases on three approaches, two set of empirical data, two analysis techniques, and conceptual study. The first data set consists of 12 qualitative semi-structured interviews with business school students who are seen as prospective entrepreneurs. The data is approached through a social constructionist perspective and analyzed through discourse analysis. The second data set bases on a qualitative multiplecase study approach that aims at theory elaboration. The main data consists of 14 individual and four group semi-structured thematic interviews with members of core entrepreneurial teams of four team startups in high-technology industries. The secondary data includes publicly available documents. This data set is approached through a critical realist perspective and analyzed through systematic thematic analysis. The study is completed through a conceptual study that aims at building a theoretical model of collective-level entrepreneurship drawing from existing literatures on organizational theory and social-psychology. The theoretical work applies a positivist perspective. This study consists of two parts. The first part includes an overview that introduces the research background, knowledge gaps and objectives, research strategy, and key concepts. It also outlines the existing knowledge of entrepreneurial team literature, presents and justifies the choices of paradigms and methods, summarizes the publications, and synthesizes the findings through answering the above mentioned research questions. The second part consists of five publications that address independent research questions but all enable to answer the research questions set for this study as a whole. The findings of this study suggest a map of relevant concepts and their relationships that help grasp collectiveness within entrepreneurial teams. The analyses conducted in the publications suggest that collectiveness within entrepreneurial teams stands for cognitive and affective structures in-between team members including elements of collective entity, collective idea of business, collective effort, collective attitudes and motivations, and collective feelings. Collectiveness within entrepreneurial teams also stands for specific joint entrepreneurial action components in which the structures are constructed. The action components reflect equality and democracy, and open and direct communication in particular. Collectiveness emerges because it is a powerful tool for overcoming individualized barriers to entrepreneurship and due to collectively oriented desire for, collective value orientation to, demand for, and encouragement to team entrepreneurship. Collectiveness emerges and reinforces in processes of joint creation and realization of entrepreneurial opportunities including joint analysis and planning of the opportunities and strategies, decision-making and realization of the opportunities, and evaluation, feedback, and sanctions of entrepreneurial action. Collectiveness matters because it is relevant for potential future entrepreneurs and because it affects the ways collective ventures are initiated and managed. Collectiveness also matters because it is a versatile, dynamic, and malleable phenomenon and the ideas of it can be applied across organizational contexts that require team work in discovering or creating and realizing new opportunities. This study further discusses how the findings add to the existing knowledge of entrepreneurial team literature and how the ideas can be applied in educational, managerial, and policy contexts.

Läheisen rooli ja tuen tarve iäkkään kotiutuessa arviointi- ja kuntoutusosastolta

Tämän tutkimuksen tarkoituksena oli kuvata läheisen roolia ja tuen tarvetta iäkkään kotiutuessa arviointi- ja kuntoutusosastolta. Tavoitteena oli saada tietoa iäkkäiden kotiutusprosessista läheisen näkökulmasta ja muodostaa käsitteellinen malli, jossa on tyypitelty läheisen erilaiset roolit, niihin vaikuttavat tekijät ja tuen tarpeet iäkkään kotiutuessa arviointi- ja kuntoutusosastolta. Tutkimus oli kuvaileva tutkimus, jossa sovellettiin metodologista triangulaatiota. Kotiutuva iäkäs nimesi läheisen (n=14), jolta kerättiin tutkimusaineistoa teemahaastattelulla ja kyselyllä (COPE -indeksi, Carers of Older People in Europe). Rekrytointi tapahtui viidellä arviointi- ja kuntoutusosastolla Etelä-Suomessa kesällä 2015. Teemahaastattelu analysoitiin induktiivisella sisällönanalyysillä ja kyselyn (COPE -indeksi) vastauksista laskettiin prosenttiosuudet ja kolmella osa-alueella laskettiin lisäksi summapisteiden keskiarvot. Tutkimuksen päätulos tuli teemahaastattelun sisällön analyysistä, jota vahvistettiin kyselystä (COPE -indeksi) saaduilla tuloksilla. Tämän tutkimuksen tuloksena syntyi käsitteellinen malli läheisen roolista ja tuen tarpeista iäkkään kotiutuessa arviointi- ja kuntoutusosastolta. Läheisen rooli jakautui neljään päärooliin, jotka olivat iäkkään arjen auttajan rooli, edunvalvojan rooli, tukijan rooli ja vastuunkantajan rooli. Arjen auttajan rooliin kuului läheisen käytännön järjestäjän rooli ja kodinhoitajan rooli. Edunvalvojan rooliin sisältyi iäkkään terveydellinen edunvalvojan rooli, taloudellinen edunvalvojan rooli ja puolestapuhujan rooli. Tukijan rooli muodostui iäkkään virkistäjän roolista ja muutokseen sopeuttajan roolista. Näissä rooleissa toimimiseen vaikuttavia tekijöitä olivat läheisen ja iäkkään välinen suhde, läheisen oma elämä, rooliin saatu tuki ja roolin mielekkyys. Läheisen roolissa tuen tarpeita olivat arjen tuki, roolissa toimimisen tuki, rohkaiseva ja sosiaalinen tuki. Kyselyn (COPE -indeksi) tulokset täydensivät kuvausta läheisen rooliin vaikuttavista tekijöistä ja tuen tarpeista. Keskeistä tuloksissa oli, että läheisillä oli hyvä suhde iäkkäisiin, avustaminen koettiin vaivan arvoiseksi ja muiden ihmisten koettiin arvostavan heidän toimimistaan iäkkään avustajana. Ajoittain avustaminen koettiin liian vaativana tuoden kielteisiä vaikutuksia omaan tunne-elämään ja fyysiseen terveydentilaan, tunnettiin olevan ansassa. Läheiset tunsivat saavansa hyvin tukea perheeltä, mutta sosiaali- ja terveyspalveluista saatavassa tuessa koettiin parannettavaa. Tämän empiirisen tutkimuksen tuloksena tuotettu käsitteellinen malli todentaa läheisen roolin monimutkaisuuden ja moniulotteisuuden. Läheisen roolissa tarvitaan erityistä tukea tilanteiden muuttuessa, kuten kotiutustilanteissa. Tutkimuksen tuloksia voidaan hyödyntää kehitettäessä iäkkäiden yksilöllistä kotiutumista ja tilanteeseen sopivia läheisen roolia tukevia palveluita.