Professional development among educators pursuing a B.Ed. program in special education in Tanzania : a study of motives and perceived outcomes

Implementation of different policies and plans aiming at providing education for all is a challenge in Tanzania. The need for educators and professionals with relevant knowledge and qualifications in special education is substantial. Teacher education does not equip educators with sufficient knowledge and skills in special education and professional development programs in special education are few in number. Up to 2005 no degree programs in special education at university level were available in Tanzania. The B.Ed. Special Education program offered by the Open University of Tanzania in collaboration with Åbo Akademi University in Finland was one of the efforts aimed at addressing the big national need for teachers and other professionals with degree qualifications in special education. This pilot program offered unique possibilities to study professional development in Tanzania. The research group in this study consisted of the group of students who participated in the degree program 2005-2007. The study is guided by three theoretical perspectives: individual, social and societal. The individual perspective emphasizes psychological factors as motives, motivation, achievement, self-directed behavior and personal growth. Within social perspective, professional development is viewed as situated within the social and cultural context. The third perspective, the societal, focuses on change, reforms, innovations and transformation of school systems and societies. Accordingly, professional development is viewed as an individual, social and societal phenomenon. The overall aim of the study is to explore the participants’ motives for participating in a B.Ed. Special Education program and the perceived outcomes of the program in terms of professional development. In order to achieve the objectives of the study, a case study approach was adopted. Questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were administered in three waves between January 2007 and February 2009 to the 35 educators participating in the B.Ed. Special Education program. The findings of the study reveal that the participants expressed motives which were related to job performance, knowledge, skills, academic degree and career. Also altruistic motives were expressed by the participants in terms of helping and supporting students with special needs and their communities. The perceived outcomes of the program were in line with the expressed motives. However, the results indicate that the participants also learned new skills, as interaction skills and guidance and counseling skills. Increased self-confidence was also mentioned as an outcome. The participants also got deepened understanding of disability issues. In addition, they learned strategies for creating awareness of persons with disability in the communities. Thus the findings of the study indicate positive outcomes of the program in terms of professional development. The conclusion of the study is that individual, social and societal factors interact when it comes to explaining why Tanzanian educators in special education choose to pursue a degree program in special education. The individual motives, as increased knowledge and better prospects of career development interact with the social and societal motives to help and support vulnerable student groups. The study contributes to increased understanding of the complexity of professional development and of the realities educators meet when educational reforms are implemented in a developing country.

Eurooppalaisen opintosuoritusten siirtojärjestelmän (ECVET) kehittämistarpeet Euroopassa

Työssä tutkitaan toisen asteen ammatillisen koulutuksen Eurooppalaista opinto-suoritusten siirtojärjestelmää ECVET:iä. Päätavoitteena on löytää suurimmat jär-jestelmän kehityskohteet ja keinot siihen koko Euroopan tasolla. Kehityskohteet selvitetään asiantuntijoiden lähettämien kyselylomakkeiden perusteella sekä ana-lysoidaan keinot kehittää järjestelmää eteenpäin tulevaisuudessa. Suurimpia on-gelmia ovat maiden erilaiset lähtökohdat lähteä kehittämään ECVET:iä, koska jokaisella maalla on erilaiset ammattikoulutusjärjestelmät, tavat arvioida ja tun-nustaa oppimista. Tarvitaan yhtenäinen näkemys ja työkalut arvioida oppimista. Jokaisen maan tulisi myös ymmärtää ja kehittää Euroopan tutkintojen viitekehyk-set (EQF) samalle tasolle jotta ne olisivat vertailukelpoisia keskenään.

Limits of Meritocracy. How Fields of Study and Gender Segregation Affect Social Stratification in Finland

This dissertation critically reviews the idea of meritocracy from both a theoretical and an empirical perspective. Based on a discussion of classical texts of social philosophy and sociology, it is argued that meritocracy as a concept for social stratification is best compatible with the sociological tradition of status attainment research: both frame social inequality in primarily individualistic terms, centring on the role of ascribed (e.g., gender, social background) and achieved (e.g., educational qualifications) characteristics for determining individuals’ socioeconomic rewards. This theoretical argument introduces the research problem at the core of this dissertation: to what extent can the individualistic conception of social stratification be maintained empirically? Fields of study and their interaction with educational attainment levels play a prominent role in the analysis of this question. Drawing on sociological versions of segmented labour market theory, it is assumed that fields of study may channel individuals into heterogeneous political-economic contexts on the labour market, which potentially modify the socioeconomic benefit individuals derive from their qualification levels. The focus on fields of study may also highlight economic differentials between men and women that derive from the persisting segregation of men’s and women’s occupational and educational specializations rather than direct gender discrimination on the labour market. The quantitative analyses in this dissertation consist of three research articles, which are based primarily on Finnish data, but occasionally extend the view to other European countries. The data sources include register-based macro- and microdata as well as survey data. Article I examines the extent and the patterns of gender segregation within the Finnish educational system between 1981 and 2005. The results show that differences between men’s and women’s field specializations have for the most part remained stable during this period, with particularly high levels of gender segregation observed at lower educational levels. The focus in Article II rests on the effects of gender-segregated fields of study on higher education graduates’ occupational status. It is shown that fields of study matter for accessing professional jobs and avoiding low-skilled positions in Finland: at the early career stage, particularly polytechnic graduates from female-dominated fields are less likely to work in professional positions. Finnish university graduates from male-dominated fields were more likely than their peers with different specializations to work as professionals, yet they also faced a greater risk of being sorted into lowskilled jobs if they failed to make use of this advantage. Article III proceeded to analyse the joint impact of educational qualification levels and fields of study on young adults’ median earnings in Finland between 1985 and 2005. The results show that qualification levels do not confer a consistent benefit in the process of earnings stratification. Advanced qualifications raise median earnings most clearly among individuals specializing in the same field of study. When comparing individuals with different field specializations, on the other hand, higher-level qualifications do not necessarily lead to higher median earnings. Overall, the findings of this dissertation reveal a heterogeneous effect of education for achieving social positions, which challenges individual-centred, meritocratic accounts of social stratification and underlines the problematic lack of structural and institutional dimensions in the dominant account of social status attainment.

Uraohjaus ja urasuunnittelu ammattikorkeakoulussa

Tutkimuksen tarkoituksena oli selvittää, millaista uraohjausta ammattikorkeakoulun tuutoriopettajat antavat ja millaista uraohjausta opiskelijat haluavat. Lisäksi tavoitteena oli selvittää, löytyykö opiskelijoiden koulutusalavalinnan perusteista yhteyttä uran suunnittelutaitoihin ja ohjauksen tarpeeseen, ja tunnistavatko tuutoriopettajat opiskelijoiden erilaiset uraohjauksen tarpeet. Tutkimuksen teoreettisissa rakenteissa hyödynnettiin kolmea postmodernia urateoriaa, jotka olivat Hodkinsonin ja Sparkesin (1997) uranvalinnan päätöksentekoteoria, Mitchellin, Lewinin ja Krumbolzin (1999) suunnitellun sattuman teoria ja Savickasin (2005) uran rakentamisteoria. Tutkimusympäristönä oli Satakunnan ammattikorkeakoulu. Tutkimus oli kaksivaiheinen. Ensimmäisessä vaiheessa kerättiin harkinnanvaraisesti valituilta tuutoriopettajilta (n=14) ja opintojensa eri vaiheissa olevilta opiskelijoilta (n=65) kirjoitettu aineisto. Kvalitatiivinen aineisto analysoitiin sisällönanalyysillä. Aineiston perusteella löydettiin kolmenlaisia urasuunnittelijoita: epävarmat, uteliaat ja tietoiset. Aineiston perusteella laadittiin kyselylomake tutkimuksen toisen vaiheen tiedonkeruuta varten. Tutkimuksen toisessa vaiheessa kerättiin opintojen eri vaiheissa olevilta opiskelijoilta kyselylomakekyselynä kvantitatiivinen aineisto (n=903), joka analysoitiin tilastollisin menetelmin. Koulutusalavalinnan perusteista elämäntilanne, alan mahdollisuudet, oma toive, kutsumus, aktiivinen tiedonhaku ja halu opiskella ammattikorkeakoulussa olivat yhteydessä opiskelijan hyvään urasuunnittelukykyyn. Näillä perusteilla koulutusalansa valinneita tietoisiksi luokiteltuja urasuunnittelijoita oli 72 % vastanneista. Alavalinnan perusteista sattuman, kavereiden, sukulaisten, lukion opinto-ohjauksen ja paikkakunnan perusteella koulutusalansa valinneet luokiteltiin epävarmoiksi urasuunnittelijoiksi, ja heitä oli 28 % vastanneista. Tulokset antavat ohjaajille tukea epävarman ja muita enemmän uraohjausta tarvitsevan opiskelijan tunnistamiseen ja heidän hops-prosessinsa tehostamiseen opintojen alusta asti. Lisäksi tulosten perusteella esitetään seuraavia suosituksia: tuutoriopettajille tulisi asettaa pätevyysvaatimukseksi ohjausalan opintojen suorittaminen; opiskelijoita tulisi ohjata tunnistamaan erilaisia satunnaisesti avautuvia mahdollisuuksia ja tietoisesti hyödyntämään niitä elämässään; uraohjaukseen tulisi kytkeä mukaan työelämäyhteistyö; ohjaajien tulisi tiivistää yhteistyötä toisen asteen ohjaajien kanssa, jotta opiskelijoiden koulutusalavalinnat onnistuisivat paremmin; uraohjausta tulisi antaa tulevaisuuden kvalifikaatioiden ennakoinnin ja elinikäisten oppimisvalmiuksien näkökulmasta.