Tiedon jakaminen ja organisaatiokulttuuri kulkevat käsi kädessä

Pro gradu -tutkielmassa selvitettiin organisaatiokulttuurin vaikutusta tiedon jakamiseen sekä tiedon jakamisen edistämistä asiantuntijaorganisaatiossa. Tavoitteena oli kehittää toimeksiannosta Fingrid Oyj:n tiedon jakamisen käytäntöjä sekä määrittää yhtiölle tavoitekulttuurin piirteet, joihin johto voi sitoutua ja jota kohti organisaatio voi kehittyä. Tutkimus toteutettiin pääosiltaan kvalitatiivisena tutkimuksena ja tutkimusotteena oli toimintatutkimus. Tutkimuksessa perehdyttiin aikaisempiin tiedon jakamista ja organisaatiokulttuurin yhteyttä selvittäneisiin tutkimuksiin. Case-yrityksen henkilöstön näkemykset nykyisestä organisaatiokulttuurista kartoitettiin hyödyntäen Cameron & Quinnin kilpailevien arvojen mallia. Pöytätutkimuksena tutustuttiin organisaation eri dokumentteihin, strategiaan, arvoihin ja ohjeisiin. Lisäksi toteutettiin 10 kpl teemahaastatteluita yhtiön organisaatiokulttuurista ja tiedon jakamisen edistämisen keinoista. Tulosten mukaan organisaatiokulttuurilla ja tiedon jakamisella on yhteys toisiinsa. Tälle löydettiin vahvistusta aikaisempien tutkimusten lisäksi myös case-yrityksen käytänteistä. Kulttuurit, joissa vuorovaikutus on avointa ja valtasuhteet matalia ja joissa kannustetaan kollektiiviseen tekemiseen yksilösuoritusten sijasta, suosivat tiedon jakamista tiedon panttaamisen sijasta. Case-yrityksen organisaatiokulttuurin dominoiviksi piirteiksi muodostuivat hierarkinen ja ryhmäkulttuuri: hierarkisuus näkyy yrityksen toiminnan ohjauksessa runsaina ohjeina ja sääntöinä, silti yrityksen ilmapiiri on epämuodollinen, organisaatiomalli on matala ja päätöksentekojärjestelmässä valtaa on jalkautettu alaspäin. Yrityksen kulttuurin todettiin tukevan tiedon jakamisen käytänteitä. Toimintatutkimuksessa Fingrid Oyj:lle määriteltiin yhdessä ylimmän johdon kanssa tavoitekulttuurin piirteet, linjattiin miten kulttuurin tulee näkyä esimiestyössä sekä laadittiin ehdotuksia tiedon jakamisen kehittämiseksi yhtiössä.

Developing construction site operations for EPC power plant projects

The purpose of this thesis is to find development areas for site operations in power plant construction projects delivered by Wärtsilä. The inspected operations are subcontractor management, site material management and work scheduling. The contractor's role in EPC project is to respond for engineering, procurement, and construction supervision. Geographical and cultural differences brings challenges for finding development areas as Wärtsilä delivers projects world-wide. Searching for development area is mainly made with survey, which answers were collected from the target company's site personnel. Based on the results, with good planning and preparation various problems would be avoided. An external view for the thesis was collected by an expert interview, which was held to three expe-rienced construction operating executives. Interviewees believed that with the se-lection of right site personnel and clearly defined areas of responsibility will great-ly affect the outcome of the project. Some of the theory has been collected from areas, which have helped to under-stand the inspected operations on site. Improving competence knowledge has been important due to the broad scope of work and the author’s inexperience of the topic. Also generally effective practices from construction projects has been col-lected to the theory part. Functionality of general practices have been reflected together with the results of empirically collected data for Wärtsilä's projects. As a result, a model was generated where development proposals and the benefits from new procedures were presented.

Between Dugin’s Eurasianism and Mahan’s Sea Power Concept: Russia’s Geopolitical Discourse within Foucault’s ‘Discursive Tree’ before and After the Incorporation of the Crimea

The fall of 2013 could be characterized as a crossroad in the geopolitics of Eastern Europe, namely Ukraine. Two rivalry geopolitical projects have been developing throughout the post-Cold War years, and it seems that they reached a collision point in Ukraine; a country whose authorities have been for long switching sides between the European Union and the Russian Federation in their foreign policy commitments. The refusal/postponing to sign the Association Agreement with Brussels, an expected event by a large category of the Ukrainian society, by Yanukovich’s government led to the outset of the latter; and brought a pro-Western, anti-Russian government in Kyiv. It seems that Ukraine, after those events, has embarked definitively on the path of integration into the West (European Union and possibly NATO). The Russian Federation, who has been throughout Putin’s years engaged into the re-integration of post-Soviet space, reacted to these developments in an assertive manner by violating borders, agreements and the territorial integrity of Ukraine. Thus, the incorporation of the Crimea into the Russian Federation is the first in its kind in the post-Soviet space, despite the existence of various other conflicts that broke out in the region after the Soviet Union broke up. I will investigate in this thesis the nature of what will be labelled, in this work, the Crimean issue. I argue that the incorporation of the Crimean peninsula into the Russian Federation marks a new era in Russian geopolitical thinking that shapes, to a far extent, Russian foreign policy. Discourse analysis will be the methodological basis for this study, with a special focus on Michel Foucault’s Archaeology of Knowledge. The innovation that this research brings is the fact that it discusses Russian geopolitical discourse within the scope of Foucault’s ‘discursive tree’, with a reference to the Crimean issue. A wide range of primary sources will be consulted in this study such as presidential addresses to the Federal Assembly (2000-2014), Foreign Policy Concepts of the Russian Federation (2000, 2008), Russian maritime doctrines, as wells as Dugin’s Osnovy Geopolitiki (Foundations of Geopolitics), Mahan’s (The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, 1660–1783) and other Eurasianism related literature.

Adaptability, Transformation and Complex Changes in Namibia and Tanzania: Resilience and Innovation System Development in Local Communities

This thesis is a research about the recent complex spatial changes in Namibia and Tanzania and local communities’ capacity to cope with, adapt to and transform the unpredictability engaged to these processes. I scrutinise the concept of resilience and its potential application to explaining the development of local communities in Southern Africa when facing various social, economic and environmental changes. My research is based on three distinct but overlapping research questions: what are the main spatial changes and their impact on the study areas in Namibia and Tanzania? What are the adaptation, transformation and resilience processes of the studied local communities in Namibia and Tanzania? How are innovation systems developed, and what is their impact on the resilience of the studied local communities in Namibia and Tanzania? I use four ethnographic case studies concerning environmental change, global tourism and innovation system development in Namibia and Tanzania, as well as mixed-methodological approaches, to study these issues. The results of my empirical investigation demonstrate that the spatial changes in the localities within Namibia and Tanzania are unique, loose assemblages, a result of the complex, multisided, relational and evolutional development of human and non-human elements that do not necessarily have linear causalities. Several changes co-exist and are interconnected though uncertain and unstructured and, together with the multiple stressors related to poverty, have made communities more vulnerable to different changes. The communities’ adaptation and transformation measures have been mostly reactive, based on contingency and post hoc learning. Despite various anticipation techniques, coping measures, adaptive learning and self-organisation processes occurring in the localities, the local communities are constrained by their uneven power relationships within the larger assemblages. Thus, communities’ own opportunities to increase their resilience are limited without changing the relations in these multiform entities. Therefore, larger cooperation models are needed, like an innovation system, based on the interactions of different actors to foster cooperation, which require collaboration among and input from a diverse set of stakeholders to combine different sources of knowledge, innovation and learning. Accordingly, both Namibia and Tanzania are developing an innovation system as their key policy to foster transformation towards knowledge-based societies. Finally, the development of an innovation system needs novel bottom-up approaches to increase the resilience of local communities and embed it into local communities. Therefore, innovation policies in Namibia have emphasised the role of indigenous knowledge, and Tanzania has established the Living Lab network.