Strike hard, strike sure - Operation Musketeer : British military planning during the Suez Crisis, 1956

Operation Musketeer, a combined joint Anglo-French operation aimed at regaining control of the Suez Canal in 1956, has received much attention from scholars. The most common approach to the crisis has been to examine the political dimension. The political events that led Prime Minister Anthony Eden’s cabinet to decide to use military force against the wishes of their superior American ally and in the face of American economic pressure and a Soviet threat to attack Paris and London with rockets have been analysed thoroughly. This is particularly the case because the ceasefire and eventual withdrawal were an indisputable defeat of British policy in the Middle East. The military operation not only ruined Prime Minister Eden’s career, but it also diminished the prestige of Britain. It was the beginning of the end, some claim. The British Empire would never be the same. As the consequences of using force are generally considered more important than the military operations themselves, very little attention has been paid to the military planning of Operation Musketeer. The difference between the number of publications on Operation Corporate of the Falklands War and Operation Musketeer is striking. Not only has there been little previous research on the military aspects of Musketeer, the conclusions drawn in the existing works have not reached a consensus. Some historians, such as Correlli Barnett, compare Musketeer to the utter failures of the Tudor landings and Gallipoli. Among significant politicians, Winston Churchill, who had retired from the prime ministership only a year before the Suez Crisis, described the operation as “the most ill-conceived and ill-executed imaginable”. Colin McInnes, a well-known author on British defence policy, represents the middle view when he describes the execution as “far from failure”. Finally, some, like Julian Thompson, the Commander of 3 Commando Brigade during the Falklands War, rate the military action itself as being successful. The interpretation of how successful the handling of the Suez Crisis was from the military point of view depends very much on the approach taken and the areas emphasised in the subject. Frequently, military operations are analysed in isolation from other events. The action of a country’s armed forces is separated from the wider context and evaluated without a solid point of comparison. Political consequences are often used as validated criteria, and complicated factors contributing to military performance are ignored. The lack of comprehensive research on the military action has left room for an analysis concentrating on the military side of the crisis.

Derby Day race card for british charities i Finland

14 x 21 cm

Kaukaa näkee paremmin lähelle : viikko British Libraryssa

Tiina Lehmikoski-Pessa vietti viikon tutustuen British Libraryn viestintään.

The Arctic Ocean between Greenland and Nova Zemla and between the 60th and 82d parallel of latitude from Swedish, Danish, British, Russian and German surveys and explorations up to 1871

Kartta kuuluu A. E. Nordenskiöldin kokoelmaan

Laser scribing of thin-film PV modules

This study is a literature review on laser scribing in monolithically interconnected thin-film PV modules, focusing on efficiency of modules based on absorber materials CIGS, CdTe and a-Si. In thin-film PV module manufacturing scribing is used to interconnect individual cells monolithically by P1, P2 and P3 scribes. Laser scribing has several advantages compared to mechanical scribing for this purpose. However, laser scribing of thin-films can be a challenging process and may induce efficiency reducing defects. Some of these defects can be avoided by improving optimisation or processing methods.

"Our aim is to challenge this conventional wisdom". Luokkatutkimuksen keskusteluja Sosiologia-lehdessä ja British Journal of Sociologyssa 1970–2010

Tutkielmani aiheena on sosiologisen luokkatutkimuksen erot ja vaiheet Suomessa ja Iso-Britanniassa neljän vuosikymmenen aikana. Keskeinen tutkimuskysymykseni on, minkälaisia muutoksia suomalaisessa ja brittiläisessä luokkatutkimuskeskustelussa on tapahtunut vuosina 1970–2010, ja miten maiden sisäiset painotukset sosiologisessa luokkatutkimuksessa eroavat toisistaan. Empiirinen tutkimusaineisto koostuu suomalaisen Sosiologian ja brittiläisen British Journal of Sociologyn vuosina 1970–2010 julkaistuista luokkatutkimusartikkeleista. Tarkastelen aineistoani ja sen diskursseja luokasta Foucault'n tiedonarkeologista tutkimusotetta soveltaen. Historian keskeisyys kyseisessä lähestymistavassa sopii tämän tutkimuksen historialliseen tutkimusasetelmaan. Tiedonarkeologinen näkökulma erottuu diskurssianalyysin perinteistä siten, että se ei ole kiinnostunut esimerkiksi kirjoittajien positioinnista erilaisiin valta-asemiin, vaan teksteistä sekä niiden suhteista toisiinsa ja historialliseen tekstien jatkumoon. Haasteelliseksi tutkimukselle osoittautui mm. luokkatutkimuksen rajaaminen foucault'laisittain niin, että saataisiin tutkittavien diskurssien kokonaisuus ja suhteet esiin mahdollisimman hyvin. Diskurssien muutosten ohella olen myös tarkastellut luokkatutkimuksen artikkelimäärien prosentuaalista osuutta kaikista tutkimusartikkeleista vuosittain. Tuloksissa näkyy joitakin eroja maiden välillä, mutta osaksi myös samankaltaisia kehityskulkuja. Muutoksia näkyy esimerkiksi keskustelujen luokkateoreettisissa painotuksissa ja puheessa luokan selitysvoimasta.