Linking Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS) data to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC): the case for the Seychelles

Tobacco control has been recognized as a main public health concern in Seychelles for the past two decades. Tobacco advertising, sponsoring and promotion has been banned for years, tobacco products are submitted to high taxes, high-profile awareness programs are organized regularly, and several other control measures have been implemented. The Republic of Seychelles was the first country to ratify the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) in the African region. Three population-based surveys have been conducted in adults in Seychelles and results showed a substantial decrease in the prevalence of smoking among adults between 1989 and 2004. A first survey in adolescents was conducted in Seychelles in 2002 (the Global Youth Tobacco Survey, GYTS) in a representative sample of 1321 girls and boys aged 13-15 years. The results show that approximately half of students had tried smoking and a quarter of both boys and girls had smoked at least one cigarette during the past 30 days. Although "current smoking" is defined differently in adolescents (>or=1 cigarette during the past 30 days) and in adults (>or=1 cigarette per day), which precludes direct comparison, the high smoking prevalence in youth in Seychelles likely predicts an increasing prevalence of tobacco use in the next adult generation, particularly in women. GYTS 2002 also provides important data on a wide range of specific individual and societal factors influencing tobacco use. Hence, GYTS can be a powerful tool for monitoring the situation of tobacco use in adolescents, for highlighting the need for new policy and programs, and for evaluating the impact of current and future programs.

Female adolescents' views on a youth-friendly clinic.

OBJECTIVE: To assess satisfaction among female patients of a youth friendly clinic and to determine with which factors this was associated. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in an adolescent clinic in Lausanne, Switzerland, between March and May 2008. All female patients who had made at least one previous visit were eligible. Three hundred and eleven patients aged 12-22 years were included. We performed bivariate analysis to compare satisfied and non-satisfied patients and constructed a log-linear model. RESULTS: Ninety-four percent of patients were satisfied. Satisfied female adolescents were significantly more likely to feel that their complaints were heard, that the caregiver understood their problems, to have no change of physician, to have received the correct treatment/help and to follow the caregiver's advice. The log-linear model highlighted four factors directly linked with patient satisfaction: outcome of care, continuity of care, adherence to treatment and the feeling of being understood. CONCLUSIONS: The main point for female adolescent patient satisfaction lies in a long term, trustworthy relationship with their caregiver. Confidentiality and accessibility were secondary for our patients.

Engorgement des centres d'urgences: une raison légitime de refuser l'accès aux patients non urgents [Emergency department overcrowding: a legitimate reason to refuse access to urgent care for non-urgent patients?].

Non-urgent cases represent 30-40% of all ED consults; they contribute to overcrowding of emergency departments (ED), which could be reduced if they were denied emergency care. However, no triage instrument has demonstrated a high enough degree of accuracy to safely rule out serious medical conditions: patients suffering from life-threatening emergencies have been inappropriately denied care. Insurance companies have instituted financial penalties to discourage the use of ED as a source of non-urgent care, but this practice mainly restricts access for the underprivileged. More recent data suggest that in fact most patients consult for appropriate urgent reasons, or have no alternate access to urgent care. The safe reduction of overcrowding requires a reform of the healthcare system based on patients' needs rather than access barriers.

La communication médicale avec les patients migrants allophones : difficultés de compréhension dans les consultations spécialisées centrées sur les douleurs musculo-squelettiques chroniques

Les suivis spécialisés de douleurs chroniques comportent des enjeux communicationnels sensibles liés notamment à la subjectivité des ressentis douloureux et aux fréquentes divergences de vue entre médecins et patients quant à l'origine du problème de santé et à son traitement. Centré sur ces suivis, ce travail de thèse a cherché à appréhender comment les situations sociolinguistiques des patients migrants allophones se répercutent sur la communication médicale et, plus particulièrement, sur la compréhension mutuelle dans les consultations. Il a emprunté une approche discursive s'appuyant sur l'analyse interactionnelle de consultations filmées et sur un riche corpus de données contextuelles recueillies dans des interviews de patients et de cliniciens. Les analyses réalisées ont, entre autres, mis en évidence que les difficultés de compréhension non résolues se concentrent dans les consultations des patients les moins à l'aise en français et que ces difficultés renferment pour la plupart une charge problématique certaine en termes de qualité des soins. Il apparaît également que lorsque des malentendus ou incompréhensions cliniquement pertinents ne peuvent être résolus, le caractère limité des compétences de français de base des patients migrants n'est jamais seul en cause. Des facteurs de complexité médicaux (ex. surestimations des connaissances médicales de base des patients), relationnels (ex. non-signalement de malentendus par les patients pour éviter de faire perdre la face au médecin) et discursifs (ex. nécessité de traiter de discours ou « voix » venant de l'extérieur de la consultation dans le cadre d'une polyphonie particulièrement marquée) jouent également des rôles de premier plan dans les difficultés non résolues les plus problématiques au plan clinique et sont généralement étroitement intriqués avec le langagier au sens strict. En termes pratiques, les résultats soulignent le rôle décisif de l'autoréflexivité chez les médecins, ainsi que de leur capacité à ajuster de manière flexible leurs styles communicationnels afin, par exemple, d'éviter le cumul de facteurs de complexités favorisant des malentendus ou incompréhensions problématiques. Les observations effectuées rappellent également l'importance du recours à des ressources d'interprétariat.