Comment gérer l'insoutenable ?

Corps mutilés, déformés, brûlés, ravagés par la maladie: dans de nombreux services, les soignants sont confrontés à des situations de l'ordre de l'insoutenable. Comment faire face sans être submergé de sentiments négatifs et surtout, comment entrer en relation avec des patients dont la souffrance psychique est immense ?

L'événement comme moyen d'expression religieuse et politique : la marche bleue d'Abdoulaye Wade et la marche des Mourides à Harlem ou comment les conditions d'accès à l'espace public outre-atlantique concurrencent l'Europe

Actes de Géoforum 2004 (Poitiers) : "Les migrations internationales : connaitre et comprendre".

Comment on "Antibodies to influenza nucleoprotein cross-react with human hypocretin receptor 2".

Did hypocretin receptor 2 autoantibodies cause narcolepsy with hypocretin deficiency in Pandemrix-vaccinated children, as suggested by Ahmed et al.? Using newly developed mouse models to report and inactivate hypocretin receptor expression, Vassalli et al. now show that hypocretin neurons (whose loss causes narcolepsy) do not express hypocretin autoreceptors, raising questions to the interpretation of Ahmed et al.'s findings.

Statines en prévention primaire: comment décider avec le patient [Statins in primary prevention: how to share the decision?].

Long-term treatment of hypercholesterolemia with statins diminishes the risk of cardiovascular events. Statins are recommended in secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. In the absence of preexisting cardiovascular disease, the decision to start a statin or not is most often made by the general practitioner and his patient. An interactive decision aid, developed by the Mayo Clinic, has just been translated in French and adapted to the Swiss epidemiology of cardiovascular risk factors, with the aim of promoting shared decision-making. This paper reviews the conditions and potential benefits of shared decision-making about statin therapy in primary prevention.

Comparison of Four Sections for Analyzing Running Mechanics Alterations During Repeated Treadmill Sprints.

We compared different approaches to analyze running mechanics alterations during repeated treadmill sprints. Thirteen active male athletes performed five 5-second sprints with 25 seconds of recovery on an instrumented treadmill. This approach allowed continuous measurement of running kinetics/kinematics and calculation of vertical and leg stiffness variables that were subsequently averaged over 3 distinct sections of the 5-second sprint (steps 2-5, 7-10, and 12-15) and for all steps (steps 2-15). Independently from the analyzed section, propulsive power and step frequency decreased with fatigue, while contact time and step length increased (P < .05). Except for step frequency, all mechanical variables varied (P < .05) across sprint sections. The only parameters that highly depend on running velocity (propulsive power and vertical stiffness) showed a significant interaction (P < .05) between the analyzed sections, with smaller magnitude of fatigue-induced change observed for steps 2-5. Considering all steps or only a few steps during early, middle, or late phases of 5-second sprints provides similar mechanical outcomes during repeated treadmill sprinting, although acceleration induces noticeable differences between the sections studied. Furthermore, quantifying mechanical alterations from the early acceleration phase may not be readily detectable, and is not recommended.