Glucose uptake, utilization, and signaling in GLUT2-null islets.

We previously reported that pancreatic islet beta-cells from GLUT2-null mice lost the first phase but preserved the second phase of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS). Furthermore, we showed that the remaining secretory activity required glucose uptake and metabolism because it can be blocked by inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation. Here, we extend these previous studies by analyzing, in GLUT2-null islets, glucose transporter isoforms and glucokinase expression and by measuring glucose usage, GSIS, and glucose-stimulated insulin mRNA biosynthesis. We show that in the absence of GLUT2, no compensatory expression of either GLUT1 or GLUT3 is observed and that glucokinase is expressed at normal levels. Glucose usage by isolated islets was increased between 1 and 6 mmol/l glucose but was not further increased between 6 and 20 mmol/l glucose. Parallel GSIS measurements showed that insulin secretion was not stimulated between 2.8 and 6 mmol/l glucose but was increased by >4-fold between 6 and 20 mmol/l glucose. Stimulation by glucose of total protein and insulin biosynthesis was also markedly impaired in the absence of GLUT2. Finally, we re-expressed GLUT2 in GLUT2-null beta-cells using recombinant lentiviruses and demonstrated a restoration of normal GSIS. Together, these data show that in the absence of GLUT2, glucose can still be taken up by beta-cells, albeit at a low rate, and that this transport activity is unlikely to be attributed to GLUT1 or GLUT3. This uptake activity, however, is limiting for normal glucose utilization and signaling to secretion and translation. These data further demonstrate the key role of GLUT2 in murine beta-cells for glucose signaling to insulin secretion and biosynthesis.

Low levels of human leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies detected by solid phase assay before transplantation are frequently clinically irrelevant.

Since new technologies based on solid phase assays (SPA) have been routinely incorporated in the transplant immunology laboratory, the presence of pretransplantation donor-specific antibodies (DSA) against human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules has generally been considered as a risk factor for acute rejection (AR) and, in particular, for acute humoral rejection (AHR). We retrospectively studied 113 kidney transplant recipients who had negative prospective T-cell and B-cell complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatches at the time of transplant. Pretransplantation sera were screened for the presence of circulating anti-HLA antibody and DSA by using highly sensitive and HLA-specific Luminex assay, and the results were correlated with AR and AHR posttransplantation. We found that approximately half of our patient population (55/113, 48.7%) had circulating anti-HLA antibody pretransplantation. Of 113 patients, 11 (9.7%) had HLA-DSA. Of 11 rejection episodes post-transplant, only two patients had pretransplantation DSA, of whom one had a severe AHR (C4d positive). One-year allograft survival was similar between the pretransplantation DSA-positive and -negative groups. Number, class, and intensity of pretransplantation DSA, as well as presensitizing events, could not predict AR. We conclude that, based on the presence of pretransplantation DSA, post-transplantation acute rejections episodes could not have been predicted. The only AHR episode occurred in a recipient with pretransplantation DSA. More work should be performed to better delineate the precise clinical significance of detecting low titers of DSA before transplantation.

Transplantation of a human mammary carcinoma cell line (BT 20) into nude mice.

Cell suspensions of a human mammary carcinoma cellline (BT 20), wh en injected subcutaneously into nude athymie mice (BALB/c NujNu), produced tumor nodules at the injection site. Subsequent seriai transM plantations also gave rise to neoplastic nodules after latency periods averaging 3 weeks. The nodules displayed morphologie and functional characteristics comparable to those of the original tumor cells. Metastases, however, were not observed in any of the tumor-bearing mice.

Potential and limitations of regulatory T-cell therapy in solid organ transplantation.

Over the past few years, the therapeutic potential of Treg has been highlighted in the field of autoimmune diseases and after allogeneic transplantation. The first hurdle for the therapeutic use of Treg is their insufficient numbers in non-manipulated individuals, in particular when facing strong immune activation and expanding effector cells, such as in response to an allograft. Here we review current approaches being explored for Treg expansion in the perspective of clinical therapeutic protocols. We describe different Treg subsets that could be suitable for clinical application, as well as discuss factors such as the required dose of Treg, their antigen-specificity and in vivo stability, that have to be considered for optimal Treg-based immunotherapy in transplantation. Since Treg may not be sufficient as stand-alone therapy for solid organ transplantation in humans, we draw attention to possible hurdles and combination therapy with immunomodulatory drugs that could possibly improve the in vivo efficacy of Treg.

Les discordances du moi : une lecture critique du débat philosophique contemporain sur l'identité personnelle au regard de la transplantation d'organes

La présente recherche analyse le concept mental d'identité personnelle et en propose une interprétation critique, qui se développe à partir des cas de troubles psychologiques se manifestant chez certains patients transplantés. Nous pensons que l'étude de ces cas offre la possibilité de repenser, et par là critiquer, certains présupposés qui conditionnent le débat philosophique contemporain sur l'identité personnelle de matrice essentiellement analytique. Nous proposons de ce concept mental une interprétation inusuelle, reposant sur une certaine compréhension de l'être (humain), que nous caractérisons par la formule «identité personnelle transductive ». Cette expression véhicule l'idée d'une «ontologie autre » ; autre que l'ontologie classique qui pense l'être comme déterminité, à l'instar d'un individu substantiel, stable et persistant. Nous nous éloignons ainsi de la conception de la déterminité telle qu'elle se développe depuis l'Antiquité grecque, parce que nous croyons que le changement ou le devenir réside dans la nature des choses. Nous avons ainsi essayé de présenter une interprétation de l'être différente, en empruntant à Gilbert Simondon la notion de « transductivité » -dans le sens d'« individuation en progrès »que cet auteur lui attribue. En comparant les témoignages des patients transplantés avec les cas imaginaires de transplantation de cerveau qui dominent les discussions philosophiques, nous avons montré la nécessité de refonder l'ontologie sur laquelle reposent les théories contemporaines de l'identité personnelle. Cette tentative répond à l'exigence de résoudre et tempérer les apories qui se font jour au sein des conceptions déterministes de la personne -soient-elles réductionnistes (à l'instar des partisans du critère de continuité psychologique et physique) ou non réductionnistes (à l'instar des conceptions simples ou Théories de l'ego basées sur une approche à la première personne, où la personne, comprise comme persistance substantielle d'un sujet, se fonde d'elle-même). Au coeur de notre démarche se trouve la notion d'« image du corps », véritable outil d'unification épistémologique et de renouvellement ontologique. Cette notion s'est révélée extrêmement utile non seulement pour comprendre et démêler les composantes qui interviennent dans le surgissement des troubles psychologiques lors des transplantations d'organes, ainsi que la variabilité des réactions individuelles, mais aussi, plus fondamentalement, pour rendre manifeste l'opération de «transduction perpétuée »qui est à la base de l'ontogenèse de l'être humain en tant que personne, donc du moi. La notion d'image du corps nous a donc permis de mettre en évidence ce que l'expérience de la transplantation d'organes bien comprise pourrait ou devrait apporter à la théorie de l'identité personnelle. C'est ainsi que, par approximation, s'est précisée l'idée d'une identité personnelle transductive, où le moi (la personne), étant interprété comme l'aspect subjectif d'une opération d'«individuation perpétuée », se donne sous le signe de la discordance.

LIGHT/HVEM/LTβR interaction as a target for the modulation of the allogeneic immune response in transplantation.

The exchange of information during interactions of T cells with dendritic cells, B cells or other T cells regulates the course of T, B and DC-cell activation and their differentiation into effector cells. The tumor necrosis factor superfamily member LIGHT (homologous to lymphotoxin, exhibits inducible expression and competes with HSV glycoprotein D for binding to herpesvirus entry mediator, a receptor expressed on T lymphocytes) is transiently expressed upon T cell activation and modulates CD8 T cell-mediated alloreactive responses upon herpes virus entry mediator (HVEM) and lymphotoxin β receptor (LTβR) engagement. LIGHT-deficient mice, or WT mice treated with LIGHT-targeting decoy receptors HVEM-Ig, LTβR-Ig or sDcR3-Ig, exhibit prolonged graft survival compared to untreated controls, suggesting that LIGHT modulates the course and severity of graft rejection. Therefore, targeting the interaction of LIGHT with HVEM and/or LTβR using recombinant soluble decoy receptors or monoclonal antibodies represent an innovative therapeutic strategy for the prevention and treatment of allograft rejection and for the promotion of donor-specific tolerance.

Bortezomib(Velcade®)-Thalidomide-Dexamethasone (VTD) Is Superior to Thalidomide-Dexamethasone (TD) In Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) Progressing or Relapsing After Autologous Transplantation

Introduction: The Thalidomide-Dexamethasone (TD) regimen has provided encouraging results in relapsed MM. To improve results, bortezomib (Velcade) has been added to the combination in previous phase II studies, the so called VTD regimen. In January 2006, the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome (IFM) initiated a prospective, randomized, parallel-group, open-label phase III, multicenter study, comparing VTD (arm A) with TD (arm B) for MM patients progressing or relapsing after autologous transplantation. Patients and Methods: Inclusion criteria: patients in first progression or relapse after at least one autologous transplantation, including those who had received bortezomib or thalidomide before transplant. Exclusion criteria: subjects with neuropathy above grade 1 or non secretory MM. Primary study end point was time to progression (TTP). Secondary end points included safety, response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Treatment was scheduled as follows: bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 was given as an i.v bolus on Days 1, 4, 8 and 11 followed by a 10-Day rest period (days 12 to 21) for 8 cycles (6 months) and then on Days 1, 8, 15, 22 followed by a 20-Day rest period (days 23 to 42) for 4 cycles (6 months). In both arms, thalidomide was scheduled at 200 mg/Day orally for one year and dexamethasone 40 mg/Day orally four days every three weeks for one year. Patients reaching remission could proceed to a new stem cell harvest. However, transplantation, either autologous or allogeneic, could only be performed in patients who completed the planned one year treatment period. Response was assessed by EBMT criteria, with additional category of near complete remission (nCR). Adverse events were graded by the NCI-CTCAE, Version 3.0.The trial was based on a group sequential design, with 4 planned interim analyses and one final analysis that allowed stopping for efficacy as well as futility. The overall alpha and power were set equal to 0.025 and 0.90 respectively. The test for decision making was based on the comparison in terms of the ratio of the cause-specific hazards of relapse/progression, estimated in a Cox model stratified on the number of previous autologous transplantations. Relapse/progression cumulative incidence was estimated using the proper nonparametric estimator, the comparison was done by the Gray test. PFS and OS probabilities were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier curves, the comparison was performed by the Log-Rank test. An interim safety analysis was performed when the first hundred patients had been included. The safety committee recommended to continue the trial. Results: As of 1st July 2010, 269 patients had been enrolled in the study, 139 in France (IFM 2005-04 study), 21 in Italy, 38 in Germany, 19 in Switzerland (a SAKK study), 23 in Belgium, 8 in Austria, 8 in the Czech republic, 11 in Hungary, 1 in the UK and 1 in Israel. One hundred and sixty nine patients were males and 100 females; the median age was 61 yrs (range 29-76). One hundred and thirty six patients were randomized to receive VTD and 133 to receive TD. The current analysis is based on 246 patients (124 in arm A, 122 in arm B) included in the second interim analysis, carried out when 134 events were observed. Following this analysis, the trial was stopped because of significant superiority of VTD over TD. The remaining patients were too premature to contribute to the analysis. The number of previous autologous transplants was one in 63 vs 60 and two or more in 61 vs 62 patients in arm A vs B respectively. The median follow-up was 25 months. The median TTP was 20 months vs 15 months respectively in arm A and B, with cumulative incidence of relapse/progression at 2 years equal to 52% (95% CI: 42%-64%) vs 70% (95% CI: 61%-81%) (p=0.0004, Gray test). The same superiority of arm A was also observed when stratifying on the number of previous autologous transplantations. At 2 years, PFS was 39% (95% CI: 30%-51%) vs 23% (95% CI: 16%-34%) (A vs B, p=0.0006, Log-Rank test). OS in the first two years was comparable in the two groups. Conclusion: VTD resulted in significantly longer TTP and PFS in patients relapsing after ASCT. Analysis of response and safety data are on going and results will be presented at the meeting.

Recognition of major histoincompatibilities after transplantation with marrow from HLA closely matched donors.

BACKGROUND: To determine the extent to which major histoincompatibilities are recognized after bone marrow transplantation, we characterized the specificity of the cytotoxic T lymphocytes isolated during graft-versus-host disease. We studied three patients transplanted with marrow from donors who were histoincompatible for different types of HLA antigens. METHODS: Patient 1 was mismatched for one "ABDR-antigen" (HLA-A2 versus A3). Two patients were mismatched for antigens that would usually not be taken into account by standard selection procedures: patient 2 was mismatched for an "HLA-A subtype" (A*0213 versus A*0201), whereas patient 3 was mismatched for HLA-C (HLA-C*0501 versus HLA-C*0701). All three HLA class I mismatches were detected by a pretransplant cytotoxic precursor test. RESULTS: Analysis of the specificity of the cytotoxic T lymphocyte clones isolated after transplantation showed that the incompatibilities detected by the pretransplant cytotoxic precursor assay were the targets recognized during graft-versus-host disease. CONCLUSIONS: Independent of whether the incompatibility consisted of a "full" mismatch, a "subtype" mismatch, or an HLA-C mismatch, all clones recognized the incompatible HLA molecule. In addition, some of these clones had undergone antigen selection and were clearly of higher specificity than the ones established before transplantation, indicating that they had been participating directly in the antihost immune response.

Role of the naive and memory CD4+T-cell repertoire in transplantation

Purpose: The exact role of individual T cell-subsets in the development of rejection is not clearly defined. Given their distinct phenotypes, effector functions and trafficking patterns, naïve (CD45RBhiCD44lo) and memory (CD45RBloCD44hi) T cells may play distinct roles in anti-donor immunity after transplantation. Furthermore, only the CD4+CD45RBlo population contains CD4+CD25+ T cells, a subset with suppressive functions playing a major role in the maintenance of peripheral tolerance. The aim of this work was to study the contribution of these individual subsets in alloresponses via the direct and indirect pathways using a murine experimental model. Methods and materials: Purified naïve or memory CD4+ T cells were adoptively transferred into lymphopenic mice undergoing a skin allograft. Donor to recipient MHC combinations were chosen in order to study the direct and the indirect pathways of allorecognition separately. Graft survival and in vivo expansion, effector function and trafficking of the transferred T cells was assessed at different time points after transplantation. Results: We found that the cross-reactive CD4+CD45RBlo memory T-cell pool was heterogeneous and contained cells with regulatory potentials, both in the CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25-populations. CD4+ T cells capable of inducing strong primary alloreactive responses in vitro and rejection of a first allograft in vivo were mainly contained within the CD45RBhi naïve CD4+ T-cell compartment. CD4+CD45RBlo T cells proliferated less abundantly to allogeneic stimulation than their naïve counterparts both in vitro and in vivo, and allowed prolonged allograft survival even after the depletion of the CD4+CD25+ subset. Interestingly, CD4+CD25-CD45RBlo T cells were capable of prolonging allograft survival, mainly when the indirect pathway was the only mechanism of allorecognition. The indirect pathway response, which was shown to drive true chronic rejection and contribute to chronic allograft dysfunction, was predominantly mediated by naïve CD4+ T cells. Conclusion: This work provides new insights into the mechanisms that drive allograft rejection and should help develop new clinical immunosuppressive protocols. In particular, our results highlight the importance of selectively targeting individual T-cell subsets to prevent graft rejection but at the same time maintain immune protective responses to common pathogens.

Impact of enterococcal colonization and infection in solid organ transplantation recipients from the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The burden of enterococcal infections has increased over the last decades with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) being a major health problem. Solid organ transplantation is considered as a risk factor. However, little is known about the relevance of enterococci in solid organ transplantation recipients in areas with a low VRE prevalence. METHODS: We examined the epidemiology of enterococcal events in patients followed in the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study between May 2008 and September 2011 and analyzed risk factors for infection, aminopenicillin resistance, treatment, and outcome. RESULTS: Of the 1234 patients, 255 (20.7%) suffered from 392 enterococcal events (185 [47.2%] infections, 205 [52.3%] colonizations, and 2 events with missing clinical information). Only 2 isolates were VRE. The highest infection rates were found early after liver transplantation (0.24/person-year) consisting in 58.6% of Enterococcus faecium. The highest colonization rates were documented in lung transplant recipients (0.33/person-year), with 46.5% E. faecium. Age, prophylaxis with a betalactam antibiotic, and liver transplantation were significantly associated with infection. Previous antibiotic treatment, intensive care unit stay, and lung transplantation were associated with aminopenicillin resistance. Only 4/205 (2%) colonization events led to an infection. Adequate treatment did not affect microbiological clearance rates. Overall mortality was 8%; no deaths were attributable to enterococcal events. CONCLUSIONS: Enterococcal colonizations and infections are frequent in transplant recipients. Progression from colonization to infection is rare. Therefore, antibiotic treatment should be used restrictively in colonization. No increased mortality because of enterococcal infection was noted.