Role of the naive and memory CD4+T-cell repertoire in transplantation

Purpose: The exact role of individual T cell-subsets in the development of rejection is not clearly defined. Given their distinct phenotypes, effector functions and trafficking patterns, naïve (CD45RBhiCD44lo) and memory (CD45RBloCD44hi) T cells may play distinct roles in anti-donor immunity after transplantation. Furthermore, only the CD4+CD45RBlo population contains CD4+CD25+ T cells, a subset with suppressive functions playing a major role in the maintenance of peripheral tolerance. The aim of this work was to study the contribution of these individual subsets in alloresponses via the direct and indirect pathways using a murine experimental model. Methods and materials: Purified naïve or memory CD4+ T cells were adoptively transferred into lymphopenic mice undergoing a skin allograft. Donor to recipient MHC combinations were chosen in order to study the direct and the indirect pathways of allorecognition separately. Graft survival and in vivo expansion, effector function and trafficking of the transferred T cells was assessed at different time points after transplantation. Results: We found that the cross-reactive CD4+CD45RBlo memory T-cell pool was heterogeneous and contained cells with regulatory potentials, both in the CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25-populations. CD4+ T cells capable of inducing strong primary alloreactive responses in vitro and rejection of a first allograft in vivo were mainly contained within the CD45RBhi naïve CD4+ T-cell compartment. CD4+CD45RBlo T cells proliferated less abundantly to allogeneic stimulation than their naïve counterparts both in vitro and in vivo, and allowed prolonged allograft survival even after the depletion of the CD4+CD25+ subset. Interestingly, CD4+CD25-CD45RBlo T cells were capable of prolonging allograft survival, mainly when the indirect pathway was the only mechanism of allorecognition. The indirect pathway response, which was shown to drive true chronic rejection and contribute to chronic allograft dysfunction, was predominantly mediated by naïve CD4+ T cells. Conclusion: This work provides new insights into the mechanisms that drive allograft rejection and should help develop new clinical immunosuppressive protocols. In particular, our results highlight the importance of selectively targeting individual T-cell subsets to prevent graft rejection but at the same time maintain immune protective responses to common pathogens.