Surrogate decision making for patients with end-stage dementia.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to explore how health surrogates of patients with dementia proceed in decision making, which considerations are decisive, and whether family surrogates and professional guardians decide differently. METHODS: We conducted an experimental vignette study using think aloud protocol analysis. Thirty-two family surrogates and professional guardians were asked to decide on two hypothetical case vignettes, concerning a feeding tube placement and a cardiac pacemaker implantation in patients with end-stage dementia. They had to verbalize their thoughts while deciding. Verbalizations were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed according to content analysis. By experimentally changing variables in the vignettes, the impact of these variables on the outcome of decision making was calculated. RESULTS: Although only 25% and 31% of the relatives gave their consent to the feeding tube and pacemaker placement, respectively, 56% and 81% of the professional guardians consented to these life-sustaining measures. Relatives decided intuitively, referred to their own preferences, and focused on the patient's age, state of wellbeing, and suffering. Professional guardians showed a deliberative approach, relied on medical and legal authorities, and emphasized patient autonomy. Situational variables such as the patient's current behavior and the views of health care professionals and family members had higher impacts on decisions than the patient's prior statements or life attitudes. CONCLUSIONS: Both the process and outcome of surrogate decision making depend heavily on whether the surrogate is a relative or not. These findings have implications for the physician-surrogate relationship and legal frameworks regarding surrogacy. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Semi-supervised remote sensing image classification with cluster kernels

A semisupervised support vector machine is presented for the classification of remote sensing images. The method exploits the wealth of unlabeled samples for regularizing the training kernel representation locally by means of cluster kernels. The method learns a suitable kernel directly from the image and thus avoids assuming a priori signal relations by using a predefined kernel structure. Good results are obtained in image classification examples when few labeled samples are available. The method scales almost linearly with the number of unlabeled samples and provides out-of-sample predictions.

On making causal claims: A review and recommendations

Social scientists often estimate models from correlational data, where the independent variable has not been exogenously manipulated; they also make implicit or explicit causal claims based on these models. When can these claims be made? We answer this question by first discussing design and estimation conditions under which model estimates can be interpreted, using the randomized experiment as the gold standard. We show how endogeneity--which includes omitted variables, omitted selection, simultaneity, common methods bias, and measurement error--renders estimates causally uninterpretable. Second, we present methods that allow researchers to test causal claims in situations where randomization is not possible or when causal interpretation is confounded, including fixed-effects panel, sample selection, instrumental variable, regression discontinuity, and difference-in-differences models. Third, we take stock of the methodological rigor with which causal claims are being made in a social sciences discipline by reviewing a representative sample of 110 articles on leadership published in the previous 10 years in top-tier journals. Our key finding is that researchers fail to address at least 66 % and up to 90 % of design and estimation conditions that make causal claims invalid. We conclude by offering 10 suggestions on how to improve non-experimental research.

Voir le monde comme une image : le schème de l'image mimétique dans la philosophie de Platon (Cratyle, Sophiste, Timée)

Résumé de la thèse Le travail de thèse «VOIR LE MONDE COMME UNE IMAGE. Le schème de l'image mimétique dans la philosophie de Platon (Cratyle, Sophiste, Timée) » d'Alexandre NEVSKY étudie la conception philosophique de l'image chez Platon. En posant la question : qu'est-ce que l'image pour Platon? l'étude se propose, dans un premier temps, d'analyser la manière précise dont l'idée de l'image fonctionne dans l'articulation logique de l'enquête platonicienne, en se basant avant tout sur trois dialogues majeurs où cette idée est explicitement thématisée par Platon lui-même, à savoir le Cratyle, le Sophiste et le Timée. Par une analyse détaillée de ces textes, Alexandre Nevsky essaie de démontrer que l'idée de l'image fonctionne comme un schème euristique dont la logique interne détermine les moments clés dans le déroulement de chaque dialogue examiné, et constitue ainsi une véritable méthode d'investigation philosophique pour Platon. En suivant cette stratégie platonicienne, l'auteur nous montre quel rôle le schème de l'image joue selon Platon d'abord dans la constitution du langage (le Cratyle), puis, dans celle du discours (le Sophiste) et, enfin, dans celle du monde (le Timée). Une telle approche lui permet de revoir l'interprétation traditionnelle de certains passages clés, célèbres pour leurs difficultés, en mettant en évidence la façon dont la nouvelle perspective platonicienne, introduite grâce au schème de l'image, permet de formuler une solution philosophique originale du problème initial. On y trouve ainsi rediscutés, pour ne citer que quelques exemples, la théorie curieuse de l'imitation phonétique et le problème de la justesse propre du nom-image, la définition philosophique de la notion d'image et la distinction platonicienne entre limage-ressemblance et l'image-apparence, la logique paradoxale de l'introduction d'un troisième genre dans la structure ontologique de l'être et la question du sens exact à donner au «discours vraisemblable » de Platon sur la naissance de l'univers. Dans un deuxième temps, cette étude tente de dégager, derrière la méthode heuristique basée sur le schème de l'image, une véritable conception de l'image mimétique chez Platon. L'une des idées principales de la thèse est ici de montrer que cette conception présente une solution philosophique de Platon au problème de l'apparence archaïque. Car, face à la question sophistique : comment une chose - que ce soit le discours ou le monde - peut-elle être une apparence, quelque chose qui n'existe pas? Platon apporte une réponse tout à fait originale elle le peut en tant qu'image. Or, l'image n'est pas une simple apparence illusoire, elle est le reflet d'une autre réalité, indépendante et véritable, que l'on doit supposer, selon Platon, même quand sa nature exacte nous échappe encore. La conception platonicienne de l'image apparaît ainsi comme un pendant indispensable de la théorie des Formes intelligibles et aussi comme son étape préalable au niveau de laquelle l'âme du philosophe, dans son ascension vers la vérité, se retrouve dans un espace intermédiaire, déjà au-delà des illusions du monde phénoménal, mais encore en-deçà des engagements métaphysiques de la théorie des Formes.

Dépistage des cancers en pratique clinique: une place privilégiée pour le partage de la décision. [Cancer screening in clinical practice: the value of shared decision-making]

Shared decision-making approach to uncertain clinical situations such as cancer screening seems more appropriate than ever. Shared decision making can be defined as an interactive process where physician and patient share all the stages of the decision making process. For patients who wish to be implicated in the management of their health conditions, physicians might express difficulty to do so. Use of patient decision aids appears to improve such process of shared decision making. L'incertitude quant à l'efficacité de certains dépistages de cancers et du traitement en cas de test positif rend l'application du partage de la décision particulièrement appropriée. Le concept du partage de la décision peut être défini comme un processus interactif où le médecin et le patient partagent les étapes du processus de décision. Face aux patients qui désirent être impliqués dans les décisions concernant leur santé, les médecins peinent parfois à le faire. Or, l'utilisation d'outils d'aide à la décision est un moyen efficace de favoriser ce partage de l'information et, si souhaité par le patient, de la décision.

Influence of the morphology of the dural sac on surgical decision making in lumbar spinal stenosis

Introduction: Surgical decision making in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) takes into account primarily clinical symptoms as well as concordant radiological findings. We hypothesized that a wide variation of operative threshold would be found in particular as far as judgment of severity of radiological stenosis is concerned. Patients and methods: The number of surgeons who would proceed to decompression was studied relative to the perceived severity of radiological stenosis based either on measurements of dural sac cross sectional area (DSCA) or on the recently described morphological grading as seen on axial T2 MRI images. A link to an electronic survey page with a set of ten axial T2 MRI images taken from ten patients with either low back pain or LSS were sent to members of three national or international spine societies. Those 10 images were randomly presented initially and re-shuffled on a second page including this time DSCA measurements in mm2, ranging from 14 to 226 mm2, giving a total of 20 images to appraise. Morphological grades were ranging from grade A to D. Surgeons were asked if they would consider decompression given the radiological appearance of stenosis and that symptoms of neurological claudication were severe in patients who were otherwise fit for surgery. Fisher's exact test was performed following dichotomization of data when appropriate. Results: A total of 142 spine surgeons (113 orthopedic spine surgeons, 29 neurosurgeons) responded from 25 countries. A substantial agreement was observed in operating patients with severe (grade C) or extreme (grade D) stenosis as defined by the morphological grade compared to lesser stenosis (A&B) grades (p<0.0001). Decision to operate was not dependent on number of years in practice, medical density in practicing country or specialty although more neurosurgeons would operate on grade C stenosis (p<0.005). Disclosing the DSCA measurement did not alter the decision to operate. Although 20 surgeons only had prior knowledge of the description of the morphological grading, their responses showed no statistically significant difference with those of the remaining 122 physicians. Conclusions: This study showed that surgeons across borders are less influenced by DSCA in their decision making than by the morphological appearance of the dural sac. Classifying LSS according to morphology rather than surface measurements appears to be consistent with current clinical practice.