Myosin motors and not actin comets are mediators of the actin-based Golgi-to-endoplasmic reticulum protein transport

We have previously reported that actin filaments are involved in protein transport from the Golgi complex to the endoplasmic reticulum. Herein, we examined whether myosin motors or actin comets mediate this transport. To address this issue we have used, on one hand, a combination of specific inhibitors such as 2,3-butanedione monoxime (BDM) and 1-[5-isoquinoline sulfonyl]-2-methyl piperazine (ML7), which inhibit myosin and the phosphorylation of myosin II by the myosin light chain kinase, respectively; and a mutant of the nonmuscle myosin II regulatory light chain, which cannot be phosphorylated (MRLC2AA). On the other hand, actin comet tails were induced by the overexpression of phosphatidylinositol phosphate 5-kinase. Cells treated with BDM/ML7 or those that express the MRLC2AA mutant revealed a significant reduction in the brefeldin A (BFA)-induced fusion of Golgi enzymes with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). This delay was not caused by an alteration in the formation of the BFA-induced tubules from the Golgi complex. In addition, the Shiga toxin fragment B transport from the Golgi complex to the ER was also altered. This impairment in the retrograde protein transport was not due to depletion of intracellular calcium stores or to the activation of Rho kinase. Neither the reassembly of the Golgi complex after BFA removal nor VSV-G transport from ER to the Golgi was altered in cells treated with BDM/ML7 or expressing MRLC2AA. Finally, transport carriers containing Shiga toxin did not move into the cytosol at the tips of comet tails of polymerizing actin. Collectively, the results indicate that 1) myosin motors move to transport carriers from the Golgi complex to the ER along actin filaments; 2) nonmuscle myosin II mediates in this process; and 3) actin comets are not involved in retrograde transport.

Regulation of protein transport from the Golgi complex to the endoplasmic reticulum by CDC42 and N-WASP.

Actin is involved in the organization of the Golgi complex and Golgi-to-ER protein transport in mammalian cells. Little, however, is known about the regulation of the Golgi-associated actin cytoskeleton. We provide evidence that Cdc42, a small GTPase that regulates actin dynamics, controls Golgi-to-ER protein transport. We located GFP-Cdc42 in the lateral portions of Golgi cisternae and in COPI-coated and noncoated Golgi-associated transport intermediates. Overexpression of Cdc42 and its activated form Cdc42V12 inhibited the retrograde transport of Shiga toxin from the Golgi complex to the ER, the redistribution of the KDEL receptor, and the ER accumulation of Golgi-resident proteins induced by the active GTP-bound mutant of Sar1 (Sar1[H79G]). Coexpression of wild-type or activated Cdc42 and N-WASP also inhibited Golgito-ER transport, but this was not the case in cells expressing Cdc42V12 and N-WASP(AWA), a mutant form of N-WASP that lacks Arp2/3 binding. Furthermore, Cdc42V12 recruited GFP-NWASP to the Golgi complex. We therefore conclude that Cdc42 regulates Golgi-to-ER protein transport in an N-WASP¿dependent manner.

Is bundling anticompetitive?

I analyze the implications of bundling on price competition in a market for complementary products. Using a model of imperfect competition with product differentiation, I identify the incentives to bundle for two types of demand functions and study how they change with the size of the bundle. With an inelastic demand, bundling creates an advantage over uncoordinated rivals who cannot improve by bundling. I show that this no longer holds with an elastic demand. The incentives to bundle are stronger and the market outcome is symmetric bundling, the most competitive one. Profits are lowest and consumer surplus is maximized.

Regulación de la movilidad celular por Profilina 1

Mi proyecto de tesis se basaba en el estudio del papel de profilina 1 en la formación de lamelas, para ello generamos una proteína recombinante y transducible, con el objetivo de poder modificar los niveles endógenos de profilina. Objetivos: i-caracterización bioquímica los tres sitios de union conocidos de la proteína de transducción, el sitio de unión a fosfo-inocitoles (PIP), el de unión a actina (Ac) y el de unión a poli-prolinas (PLP). ii-estudio de la polimerización in-vitro de actina - PTD4-Profilina1 iii-estudio de las proteínas componentes de lamelas inducidas por PTD4-Profilina1. Plan de trabajo: i-Para comprobar la funcionalidad los 3 sitios de unión fueron necesarias las primeras 6 semanas, ya que en primer lugar había que expresar y purificar el peptido Srv2, necesario para el ensayo de PLP. En segundo lugar, se obtuvieron los datos de las concentraciones adecuadas de lípidos para el ensayo de fosfo-inocitoles y por ultimo, se purifico la actina necesaria para el ensayo de unión a actina. Una vez establecida la funcionalidad de la proteína, se procedió a: ii-el estudio de polimerización in-vitro, que llevo 2 semanas. Demostrando que in-vitro era capaz de inhibir la polimerización de una manera similar a la endógena. Una vez terminados estos ensayos, se procedio a: iii-la caracterización inmunohistoquímica de las proteínas componentes de la lamela que fue llevado a cabo en 4 semanas. Para ello se usaron anticuerpos contra: alfa-actinina, talina, vinculina, ENA/Vasp y paxillina. Conclusiones: i-las propiedades bioquímicas de la PTD4-Profilina1 son similares a las de la profilina endógena. ii-los estudios de polimerización indican que la polimerización se produce de manera similar a la endogena. iii-los ensayos de inmunohistoquímica sugieren que, talina esta ausente y que las demás están presentes aunque en menor concentración y con otra distribución comparadas con los controles.

Endogenous Mergers of Complements with Mixed Bundling

This paper studies endogenous mergers of complements with mixed bundling, by allowing both for joint and separate consumption. After merger, partner fi…rms decrease the price of the bundled system. Besides, when markets for individual components are suffi…ciently important, partner …firms raise prices of stand-alone products, exploiting their monopoly power in local markets and making substitute 'mix-and-match' composite products less attractive to consumers. Even though these effects favor the pro…fitability of mergers, merging is not always an equilibrium outcome. The reason is that outsiders respond by cutting their prices to retain their market share, and mergers can be unprofitable when competition is intense. From a welfare analysis, we observe that the number of mergers observed in equilibrium may be either excessive (when markets for individual components are important) or suboptimal (when markets for individual components are less important). Keywords: complements; merger; mixed bundling; separate consumption JEL classi…fication: L13; L41; D43