Hand Involvement in Ollier Disease and Maffucci Syndrome: a Case Series

Ollier Disease and Maffucci Syndrome are two rare diseases that can cause tumors in several organs, having a special predilection for the hand. However, there have been very few reports in the literature focusing on hand manifestations of these diseases. We report the cases of three female patients: one with Ollier Disease, and two other with Maffucci Syndrome. All patients had hand involvement as their initial primary complaint. The Ollier Disease patient developed chondrosarcomas of two digits and had to have these fingers amputated. One of the Maffucci patients died one year after presentation from a brain glioblastoma. These cases emphasize the importance of early diagnosis of Ollier Disease and Maffucci Syndrome, as these two conditions are associated not only to crippling hand deformity, but also to a significant risk of chondrosarcoma, and other malignant tumors.

Apendicite Aguda - Clínica Versus Histologia

Introdução: A apendicite aguda continua a ser um dos principais diagnósticos nos Serviços de Cirurgia Pediátrica. A taxa de apendicectomia negativa (apendicectomia sem evidência histológica de patologia), frequentemente utilizada como índice de qualidade hospitalar, permanece alta, apesar dos esforços para a reduzir, especialmente em crianças com menos de 6 anos. Objectivos: os objectivos primários foram: o cálculo da taxa de apendicectomia negativa, da concordância entre diagnóstico clínico (pós-operatório) e diagnóstico histológico e a caracterização da discordância diagnóstica por tipo de apendicite (fleimonosa, gangrenada, perfurada). A caracterização dos grupos apendicectomia negativa (A) e apendicites perfuradas (B), bem como a relação entre estes dois grupos ao longo dos anos, constituíram objectivos secundários. Material e Método: Estudo retrospectivo dos dados clínicos de 1000 doentes consecutivamente operados com o diagnóstico clínico de apendicite aguda, no Hospital de Dona Estefânia, no período de 1 de Janeiro 2003 – 30 de Setembro 2007, procedendo-se à consulta da folha de requisição de exame histo-patológico enviada para o Serviço de Anatomia Patológica. Foram revistos os dados epidemiológicos, a qualidade da informação da referida folha de requisição e calculada a taxa de apendicectomia negativa nesta amostra. Resultados: O diagnóstico clínico pós-operatório foi concordante com o diagnóstico histológico em cerca de 60% casos, sendo subvalorizado ou sobrevalorizado nos restantes casos. A taxa de apendicectomia negativa observada foi de 5,5%, o que está abaixo dos valores apresentados na literatura. Conclusões: As apendicectomias negativas devem ser um “mal menor” em relação às apendicites perfuradas. A discordância clínico-histológica pode ter implicações médico-legais e tem seguramente implicações clínicas e económicas pelo que urge reavaliar o modelo de abordagem desta patologia tão frequente.

O Regresso a Casa

Assistimos, actualmente, a uma política de cuidados de saúde hospitalares orientada essencialmente para o tratamento da doença e reabilitação da Pessoa, em que se preconizam os internamentos hospitalares cada vez mais curtos e o regresso precoce a casa. O regresso a casa é uma realidade. Uma realidade que pressupõe: acessibilidade aos cuidados de saúde; avaliação das necessidades globais; organização e prática do trabalho interdisciplinar e em parceria; adequação ao tipo e grau das limitações; focalização na reabilitação e autonomia; respeito pelos direitos, dignidade e individualidade e o envolvimento da Pessoa e família. Deste modo, várias questões se levantam ao reflectirmos sobre esta problemática: Como podemos preparar o regresso de alguém a casa se não o enquadrarmos no seu processo de reabilitação e no seu contexto familiar, reconhecendo o seu lugar, as suas interacções e as suas potencialidades? Como podemos integrar e habilitar a família para a prestação de cuidados sem a conhecermos e sem identificarmos as suas necessidades? Como pode a família cuidar, se não for cuidada?

A Communication Intervention for Training Southern European Oncologists to Recognize Psychosocial Morbidity in Cancer. I - Development of the Model and Preliminary Results on Physicians' Satisfaction

BACKGROUND: The detection of psychosocial distress is a significant communication problem in Southern Europe and other countries. Work in this area is hampered by a lack of data. Because not much is known about training aimed at improving the recognition of psychosocial disorders in cancer patients, we developed a basic course model for medical oncology professionals. METHODS: A specific educational and experiential model (12 hours divided into 2 modules) involving formal teaching (ie, journal articles, large-group presentations), practice in small groups (ie, small-group exercises and role playing), and discussion in large groups was developed with the aim of improving the ability of oncologists to detect emotional disturbances in cancer patients (ie, depression, anxiety, and adjustment disorders). RESULTS: A total of 30 oncologists from 3 Southern European countries (Italy, Portugal, and Spain) participated in the workshop. The training course was well accepted by most participants who expressed general satisfaction and a positive subjective perception of the utility of the course for clinical practice. Of the total participants, 28 physicians (93.3%) thought that had they been exposed to this material sooner, they would have incorporated the techniques received in the workshop into their practices; 2 participants stated they would likely have done so. Half of the doctors (n = 15) believed that their clinical communication techniques were improved by participating in the workshop, and the remaining half thought that their abilities to communicate with cancer patients had improved. CONCLUSIONS: This model is a feasible approach for oncologists and is easily applicable to various oncology settings. Further studies will demonstrate the effectiveness of this method for improving oncologists skills in recognizing emotional disorders in their patients with cancer.

Prostate Cancer: The Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging has been increasingly used for detection, localization and staging of prostate cancer over the last years. It combines high-resolution T2 Weighted-Imaging and at least two functional techniques, which include Dynamic Contrast–Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Diffusion-Weighted Imaging, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Spectroscopy. Although the combined use of a pelvic phased-array and an Endorectal Coil is considered the state-of-the-art for Magnetic Resonance Imaging evaluation of prostate cancer, Endorectal Coil is only absolute mandatory for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Spectroscopy at 1.5 T. Sensitivity and specificity levels in cancer detection and localization have been improving with functional technique implementation, compared to T2 Weighted-Imaging alone. It has been particularly useful to evaluate patients with abnormal PSA and negative biopsy. Moreover, the information added by the functional techniques may correlate to cancer aggressiveness and therefore be useful to select patients for focal radiotherapy, prostate sparing surgery, focal ablative therapy and active surveillance. However, more studies are needed to compare the functional techniques and understand the advantages and disadvantages of each one. This article reviews the basic principles of prostatic mp-Magnetic Resonance Imaging, emphasizing its role on detection, staging and active surveillance of prostate cancer.

The Shading Sign: Is It Exclusive of Endometriomas?

OBJECTIVES: To investigate if the shading sign is an exclusive MRI feature of endometriomas or endometrioid tumors, and to analyze its different patterns. METHODS: Three hundred and fourty six women with adnexal masses who underwent 1.5/3-T MRI were included in this retrospective, board-approved study. The shading sign was found in 56 patients, but five cases were excluded due to lack of imaging follow-up or histological correlation. The final sample included 51 women. The type of tumor and the pattern of shading were recorded for each case. RESULTS: Thirty endometriomas and five endometrioid carcinomas were found. The remaining 16 cases corresponded to other benign and malignant tumors. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 73%, 93%, 59%, and 96%, respectively. Restricting the analysis to cystic lesions without solid or fat component, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 73%, 96%, 94%, and 80%. Five shading patterns were identified: layering (15.7%), liquid-liquid level (11.8%), homogenous (45.1%), heterogeneous (11.8%), and focal/multifocal shading within a complex mass (19.6%). No significant correlation was found between these patterns and the type of tumor. CONCLUSIONS: The shading sign is not exclusive of endometriomas or endometrioid tumors. Homogenous shading was the most prevalent pattern in endometriomas and half of the cases with focal/multifocal shading within a complex mass were endometrioid carcinomas.

American Society of Anesthesiologists Score: Still Useful After 60 Years? Results of the EuSOS Study

OBJECTIVE: The European Surgical Outcomes Study described mortality following in-patient surgery. Several factors were identified that were able to predict poor outcomes in a multivariate analysis. These included age, procedure urgency, severity and type and the American Association of Anaesthesia score. This study describes in greater detail the relationship between the American Association of Anaesthesia score and postoperative mortality. METHODS: Patients in this 7-day cohort study were enrolled in April 2011. Consecutive patients aged 16 years and older undergoing inpatient non-cardiac surgery with a recorded American Association of Anaesthesia score in 498 hospitals across 28 European nations were included and followed up for a maximum of 60 days. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Decision tree analysis with the CHAID (SPSS) system was used to delineate nodes associated with mortality. RESULTS: The study enrolled 46,539 patients. Due to missing values, 873 patients were excluded, resulting in the analysis of 45,666 patients. Increasing American Association of Anaesthesia scores were associated with increased admission rates to intensive care and higher mortality rates. Despite a progressive relationship with mortality, discrimination was poor, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.658 (95% CI 0.642 - 0.6775). Using regression trees (CHAID), we identified four discrete American Association of Anaesthesia nodes associated with mortality, with American Association of Anaesthesia 1 and American Association of Anaesthesia 2 compressed into the same node. CONCLUSION: The American Association of Anaesthesia score can be used to determine higher risk groups of surgical patients, but clinicians cannot use the score to discriminate between grades 1 and 2. Overall, the discriminatory power of the model was less than acceptable for widespread use.