7 resultados para Marié-Davy, Hippolyte (1820-1893) -- Portraits
Resumo:
Portuguese version:
Resumo:
Dissertação de Mestrado em História dos Séculos XIX-XX (secção do século XIX)
Resumo:
Dissertação apresentada para cumprimento dos requisitos necessários à obtenção do grau de Doutor em Estudos Portugueses, Cultura Portuguesa do século XX
Resumo:
pp. 197-209
Resumo:
The term res publica (literally “thing of the people”) was coined by the Romans to translate the Greek word politeia, which, as we know, referred to a political community organised in accordance with certain principles, amongst which the notion of the “good life” (as against exclusively private interests) was paramount. This ideal also came to be known as political virtue. To achieve it, it was necessary to combine the best of each “constitutional” type and avoid their worst aspects (tyranny, oligarchy and ochlocracy). Hence, the term acquired from the Greeks a sense of being a “mixed” and “balanced” system. Anyone that was entitled to citizenship could participate in the governance of the “public thing”. This implied the institutionalization of open debate and confrontation between interested parties as a way of achieving the consensus necessary to ensure that man the political animal, who fought with words and reason, prevailed over his “natural” counterpart. These premises lie at the heart of the project which is now being presented under the title of Res Publica: Citizenship and Political Representation in Portugal, 1820-1926. The fact that it is integrated into the centenary commemorations of the establishment of the Republic in Portugal is significant, as it was the idea of revolution – with its promise of rupture and change – that inspired it. However, it has also sought to explore events that could be considered the precursor of democratization in the history of Portugal, namely the vintista, setembrista and patuleia revolutions. It is true that the republican regime was opposed to the monarchic. However, although the thesis that monarchy would inevitably lead to tyranny had held sway for centuries, it had also been long believed that the monarchic system could be as “politically virtuous” as a republic (in the strict sense of the word) provided that power was not concentrated in the hands of a single individual. Moreover, various historical experiments had shown that republics could also degenerate into Caesarism and different kinds of despotism. Thus, when absolutism began to be overturned in continental Europe in the name of the natural rights of man and the new social pact theories, initiating the difficult process of (written) constitutionalization, the monarchic principle began to be qualified as a “monarchy hedged by republican institutions”, a situation in which not even the king was exempt from isonomy. This context justifies the time frame chosen here, as it captures the various changes and continuities that run through it. Having rejected the imperative mandate and the reinstatement of the model of corporative representation (which did not mean that, in new contexts, this might not be revived, or that the second chamber established by the Constitutional Charter of 1826 might not be given another lease of life), a new power base was convened: national sovereignty, a precept that would be shared by the monarchic constitutions of 1822 and 1838, and by the republican one of 1911. This followed the French example (manifested in the monarchic constitution of 1791 and in the Spanish constitution of 1812), as not even republicans entertained a tradition of republicanism based upon popular sovereignty. This enables us to better understand the rejection of direct democracy and universal suffrage, and also the long incapacitation (concerning voting and standing for office) of the vast body of “passive” citizens, justified by “enlightened”, property- and gender-based criteria. Although the republicans had promised in the propaganda phase to alter this situation, they ultimately failed to do so. Indeed, throughout the whole period under analysis, the realisation of the potential of national sovereignty was mediated above all by the individual citizen through his choice of representatives. However, this representation was indirect and took place at national level, in the hope that action would be motivated not by particular local interests but by the common good, as dictated by reason. This was considered the only way for the law to be virtuous, a requirement that was also manifested in the separation and balance of powers. As sovereignty was postulated as single and indivisible, so would be the nation that gave it soul and the State that embodied it. Although these characteristics were common to foreign paradigms of reference, in Portugal, the constitutionalization process also sought to nationalise the idea of Empire. Indeed, this had been the overriding purpose of the 1822 Constitution, and it persisted, even after the loss of Brazil, until decolonization. Then, the dream of a single nation stretching from the Minho to Timor finally came to an end.
Resumo:
O presente estudo tem como objectivo estudar as questões do tempo e da ordem no reino de Mari. A análise destas questões evidencia dois aspectos importantes: por um lado, a convergência de duas culturas distintas – uma cultura acádica, tipicamente mesopotâmica, e uma cultura amorrita, mais ocidental – num mesmo espaço e, por outro lado, a importância do reino de Mari como um estudo de caso que retrata, por vezes com grande pormenor, a influência da penetração dos povos nómadas nas terras da Mesopotâmia e as suas repercussões nos vários domínios da vida pública. Estudar a ordem implica compreender a organização do mundo e da sociedade, bem como a relação entre as esferas humana e celeste. Estudar o tempo implica, por sua vez, entender como o homem se posiciona no espaço, como entende a sua história e o seu destino. Uma análise focada nestes dois temas permitir-nos-á, pois, compreender qual era o verdadeiro sentido da vida e do mundo para o homem de Mari. Como veremos, para o mariota, a vida assentava numa intensa dinâmica na qual a família detinha o papel principal: era ela que o enquadrava na sociedade, que lhe permitia participar nos destinos da vida pública e receber as devidas honras após a morte. Nesta perspectiva, a família e os laços de sangue adquiriam um papel preponderante em vários domínios da vida humana. Eram os laços consanguíneos que imperavam aquando da escolha de aliados e partidários. Por outro lado, o culto do parentesco impunha uma visão da história segundo a qual o tempo passado se afirmava como o grande modelo teórico das acções desenvolvidas no quotidiano (no presente). Paralelamente à família, o homem de Mari acreditava que no mundo divino residia a sua verdadeira esperança de levar uma vida feliz. A imagem de uma teocracia, onde homem e deus partilhavam o mesmo destino, é transversal a todo o pensamento e acção do homem de Mari. Nesta tese, propomos desenvolver um estudo de conjunto, uma análise transversal que abranja todos os aspectos da vida social e humana: a religião, a política, a cultura e a sociedade
Resumo:
Because of the distance in time and the lack of testifying documents, one should be extremely careful when labelling portraits in medieval books of hours as donor portraits or owner portraits. There are, however, manuscripts that reveal their first owner within their decorative programme, and the Lamoignon Hours (Lisbon, Gulbenkian, ms LA 237) is one of these. This article aims to discuss the iconography of the three portraits found on f.165v, f.202v and f.286v, as well as the relevance of portraiture and heraldic insignia in books of hours and the significance of such content to the original owner and to those who possessed the book afterwards.