O tempo do silêncio - diálogo da ressurreição de Gil Vicente

Vamos tecer algumas considerações sobre o Diálogo da Ressureição de Gil Vicente. Esta peça, certamente a mais curta do autor (316 versos), prolonga o Breve Sumário da História de Deus (1044 versos); as duas em conjunto formam um ciclo completo da Paixão - "o Diálogo fecha este fresco", diz-nos Paul Teyssier2. ^ obra em estudo pertence ao gênero farsa enquanto a História de Deus retira as suas personagens e os seus temas do texto bíblico. Nenhuma peça religiosa de Gil Vicente está tão perto dos mistérios representados na mesma época na Europa, nomeadamente em França. A representação da Ressureição tem uma longa história. O mais antigo texto descrevendo uma Visitado sepulchri provém certamente da Regularis concórdia anglicae nationis monachomm sanctimonaliumque, redigida enfre 965 e 975, que explicita emprestar esta prática à abadia de Fleury.

A intervenção da seguradora nas acções propostas contra o segurado

The problem to be discussed results from the relationship established between the insurer and insured by the conclusion of an insurance contract, namely an optional liability insurance contract, to cover the risks taken by the insured resulting from the occurrence of a claim, such as those arising from the emergence of the liability and consequent obligation to compensate damages caused to a third party. This thesis concerns thus the debate between those who consider that, in the optional insurance, the third party may require compliance with the provision to both the insured and the insurer (in the case of voluntary joinder, pursuant to Art. 27 CCP, which corresponds Art. 32 of the New Code of Civil Procedure, Law n. 41/2013 of 26 June, which entered into force on 1 September, hereinafter New Code) - insurance contract on behalf of a third party conception - in the same way that the insured defendant can bring the insurer to intervene as co-defendant in the main process, pursuant al. a) of art. 325 of the CCP (corresponding to art. 316 of the New Code - main intervention caused), and those who argue that the insurer may only intervene in the action as an ancillary party, to assist the defendant, lacking interest, therefore, in necessary or volunteer joinder, with the consequence that the insurer cannot be sued as a main party - only ancillary intervention is justifiable (cf. art. 330 CPC, which corresponds to art. 321 of the New Code).