O princípio da confidencialidade na mediação em matéria civil e comercial

The purpose of the following study is to analyze the relevance of the principle of confidentiality concerning mediation on civil and commercial matters developed in Portugal. We will, essentially, try to determine just how pivotal is this principle and how it affects the effectiveness of that method of alternative dispute resolution. We believe it is fundamental to understand the true extent of this principle and its goals, emphasizing the protection given to those who decide to resort to mediation and its impact on this process. For this dissertation, we have based our analysis on the interpretation of the set rules assembled by Law nr 29/2013, April 19th, while combining it with data gathered from other laws and regulations that had also addressed mediation. Furthermore, given the fact that this subject has been regulated by Directive 2008/52/EC, we deem pertinent to include references to other European mediation regulations, namely from Germany, Spain and France. With this study, we have established that, even though the Portuguese mediation law is based on a European Directive, we have determined a more restrictive regulation for the principle of confidentiality. We have concluded that the rules regarding this principle try to preserve, above all, the trust and honesty established during the course of the mediation, while restricting the possibility of using the information disclosed during these sessions on other cases. Additionally, we believe confidentiality is such a distinctive and relevant feature that its legal framework leads us to deem it as a true obstacle to the parties’ private autonomy and their power to determine how the mediation should be carried out.

A culpa do serviço como fundamento do dever de indemnizar por parte da Administração Pública

Avec l’évolution de la conception de l’État social de droit et avec la modification de la conception des relations entre l’administration publique et ses fonctionnaires, l’idée d’un État irresponsable a commencé a disparaître et à donner lieu à une responsabilité administrative toujours en croissance envers des actions ou des omissions qui portent préjudice aux particuliers. Après un comportement négligent, et avec un retard significatif par rapport au système français qui l’ a inspiré, l’ordre juridique portugais a accueilli, d’abord dans la jurisprudence, ensuite dans la doctrine et, finalement, dans la législation, avec la lo i, nº 67/2007 du 31 Décembre, la figure de la faute du service. Cet institut fonde le devoir de l’administration publique de dédommager l’individu lésé, même si ce n’est point possible d’avérer l’ auteur individuel et concret du préjudice. On considère que il y a eu un fonctionnement irrégulier et le service publique, en général, en est responsabilisé.