Entre o fazer e o dever

A compreensão da ocorrência das doenças em termos de risco e o estabelecimento de relações com os chamados estilos de vida, colocam na experiência de doença um acréscimo de conotações morais, um dever de autodisciplina e responsabilidade. Estes princípios têm sido inúmeras vezes sublinhados nos discursos e políticas da Saúde Pública, nomeadamente no que concerne às doenças cardiovasculares pela importância epidemiológica, económica e social de que se revestem e consequente necessidade de redução da sua grande incidência na população, como é o caso de Portugal. A hipertensão, como doença crónica e fator de risco cardiovascular sujeita os doentes a controlo médico periódico, terapêutica farmacológica e impele a um comprometimento com comportamentos alimentares e exercício físico adequado. Através das entrevistas realizadas a doentes hipertensos utentes da consulta específica em Cuidados de Saúde Primários, verifica-se a presença de modos diversos de agir perante a circunstância de se ter hipertensão arterial, mostrando a presença de várias racionalidades, apreciações e valorações práticas dos comportamentos de saúde e doença e do próprio corpo. Para os doentes hipertensos entrevistados, a hipertensão arterial não é encarada como uma “verdadeira doença”, sendo vista sobretudo como resultado do envelhecimento e dos excessos que se acumularam no corpo, consequentes da própria vida. Nas narrativas de experiência de doença, os conceitos de moderação e equilíbrio, “ter cuidado”, parecem servir de mecanismo de operacionalização entre aquilo que são as recomendações médicas e as práticas individuais. Constatam-se as capacidades dos doentes hipertensos construírem para si formas de gestão da doença e do medo, sendo que os seus comportamentos podem passar por assumir o controlo dos fatores de risco ou ignorá-los. Em qualquer dos casos, as representações e ações relativas à hipertensão e às recomendações médicas a ela associadas integram-se nas práticas quotidianas dos doentes, ajustando-se a hábitos e representações instaladas, constituindo-se em modos distintos de agir dos doentes hipertensos.

A culpa do serviço como fundamento do dever de indemnizar por parte da Administração Pública

Avec l’évolution de la conception de l’État social de droit et avec la modification de la conception des relations entre l’administration publique et ses fonctionnaires, l’idée d’un État irresponsable a commencé a disparaître et à donner lieu à une responsabilité administrative toujours en croissance envers des actions ou des omissions qui portent préjudice aux particuliers. Après un comportement négligent, et avec un retard significatif par rapport au système français qui l’ a inspiré, l’ordre juridique portugais a accueilli, d’abord dans la jurisprudence, ensuite dans la doctrine et, finalement, dans la législation, avec la lo i, nº 67/2007 du 31 Décembre, la figure de la faute du service. Cet institut fonde le devoir de l’administration publique de dédommager l’individu lésé, même si ce n’est point possible d’avérer l’ auteur individuel et concret du préjudice. On considère que il y a eu un fonctionnement irrégulier et le service publique, en général, en est responsabilisé.

Cumprimento de ordens, obediência hierárquica e disciplina militar versus perpetração (in)voluntária de crimes

Following orders, hierarchical obedience and military discipline are essential values for the survival of the armed forces. Without them, it is not possible to conceive the armed forces as an essential pillar of a democratic state of law and a guarantor of national independence. As issuing orders as well as receiving and following them are inextricably linked to military discipline, and as such injunctions entail the workings of a particular obedience regime within the specific kind of organized power framework which is the Armed Forces, only by analysing the importance of such orders within this microcosm – with its strict hierarchical structure – will it be possible to understand which criminal judicial qualification to ascribe to the individual at the rear by reference to the role of the front line individual (i.e. the one who issues an order vs the one who executes it). That is, of course, when we are faced with the practice of unlawful acts, keeping in mind the organizational framework and its influence over the will of the executor. One thing we take as read, if the orders can be described as unlawful, the boundary line of the duty of obedience, which cannot be overstepped, both because of a legal as well as a constitutional imperative, will have been crossed. And the military have sworn an oath of obedience to the fundamental law. The topic of hierarchical obedience cannot be separated from the analysis of current legislation which pertains to the topic within military institutions. With that in mind, it appeared relevant to address the major norms which regulate the matter within the Portuguese military legal system, and, whenever necessary and required by the reality under analysis, to relate that to civilian law or legal doctrine.

Gestão de crises de âmbito policial

The issues concerning Crisis Situations under the scope of police activity, raised after incidents considered critical, has emerged with greater intensity during the most recent decades, posing a major challenge for police forces around the world. These are situations or events of crucial importance, involving hostage taken or barricaded individuals, in which inevitably human lives are at risk, requiring from law enforcement agencies a specific response capability, i.e., a type of intervention not framed under the parameters considered as routine, in order to obtain solutions to minimize the possibility of casualties. Because this is about impacting situations of extreme gravity, where the preservation of human lives is concerned and, in many cases, the very Rule of Law as well, we understand the need for police forces to adapt to new procedures and working methods. Such procedures are an enormously complex task that requires the coordination and articulation of several components, including not infrequently the performance of different police forces, as well as organizations and entities with varied powers and duties, which implies the need for effective management. This explains the emergence of Crisis Management Structures, imposing to determine which are their fundamental components, their importance, how they interconnect, and their major goal. The intrinsic features will also be analyzed in the aspect that we consider to be the fundamental groundwork of a Crisis Management Structure, i.e., Negotiation itself, considering it as a kind of police intervention, where a wide range of procedures feeds a channel of dialogue, aiming at minimizing the damage resultant from an extreme action, in particular, to prevent the death of any of those involved. This is in essence the path we have chosen to develop this study, trying to find out an answer to the fundamental question: What model of Crisis Management Structure should be adopted to manage a critical event involving hostage negotiation?