The Port as a “Non Consensual” Organisation: An IC Management Perspective

This paper addresses a gap in the literature concerning the management of Intellectual Capital (IC) in a port, which is a network of independent organizations that act together in the provision of a set of services. As far as the authors are aware, this type of empirical context has been unexplored when regarding knowledge management or IC creation/destruction. Indeed, most research in IC still focus on individual firms, despite the more recent interest placed on the analysis of macro-level units such as regions or nations. In this study, we conceptualise the port as meta-organisation, which has the generic goal of economic development, both for itself and for the region where it is located. It provides us with a unique environment due to its complexity as an “organisation” composed by several organisations, connected by interdependency relationships and, typically, with no formal hierarchy. Accordingly, actors’ interests are not always aligned and in some situations their individual interests can be misaligned with the collective goals of the port. Moreover, besides having their own interests, port actors also have different sources of influence and different levels of power, which can impact on the port’s Collective Intellectual Capital (CIC). Consequently, the management of the port’s CIC can be crucial in order for its goals to be met. With this paper we intend to discuss how the network coordinator (the port authority) manages those complex relations of interest and power in order to develop collaboration and mitigate conflict, thus creating collective intellectual assets or avoiding intellectual liabilities that may emerge for the whole port. The fact that we are studying complex and dynamic processes, about which there is a lack of understanding, in a complex and atypical organisation, leads us to consider the case study as an appropriate method of research. Evidence presented in this study results from preliminary interviews and also from document analysis. Findings suggest that alignment of interests and actions, at both dyadic and networking levels, is critical to develop a context of collaboration/cooperation within the port community and, accordingly, the port coordinator should make use of different types of power in order to ensure that port’s goals are achieved.

Que alternativa ao currículo regular no ensino básico?

Encaramos o currículo como um projeto em constante transformação, que tendo por referência o currículo nacional, é adequado ao seu públicoalvo, os alunos. No contexto de cada comunidade onde a escola está inserida, a definição das ofertas educativas/curriculares assume maior pertinência, podendo contemplar componentes locais e regionais do currículo, valorizando as caraterísticas de cada região e, sobretudo, engrandecer os talentos dos alunos, de acordo com as suas especificidades individuais. A reflexão, realizada em torno das dificuldades que muitos alunos têm em realizar as aprendizagens previstas no currículo oficial, deu origem a uma questão central: Que alternativa ao currículo regular no ensino básico? Na procura de respostas à questão, abordamos o nascimento da escola e conceitualização de currículo, a evolução da formação para o mundo do trabalho, a diversificação curricular e a autonomia da escola. O estudo empírico seguiu uma metodologia quantitativa e qualitativa, através de um estudo de caso e centrou-se: na análise documental do Projeto Educativo do Agrupamento; inquérito por questionário aos alunos do terceiro ciclo do ensino básico, regular e cursos vocacionais; inquérito por entrevistas semiestruturadas ao Presidente do Conselho Geral do Agrupamento, Diretora do Agrupamento, Coordenadoras de Departamento, Coordenador dos Cursos Vocacionais e representante no Conselho Pedagógico dos Serviços de Psicologia e Orientação. Expomos as conclusões da investigação através da triangulação dos dados obtidos com os instrumentos de recolha. Como resposta à questão inicial, apresentamos uma proposta alternativa ao currículo regular do ensino básico, que procura diversificar a oferta.

Intellectual Capital and Performance in Higher Education Organizations

This paper intends to explore the relative importance of different Intellectual Capital (IC) dimensions regarding their contribution to the perceived performance of an Higher Education Organization (HEO). It also seeks to discuss the role of IC and performance measurement in these organizations. This is done through a case study conducted in a Portuguese HEO. The particularities of this type of organization turns it into a very interesting empirical ground for IC research. Evidence suggests that although human, structural and relational capital should contribute as a “whole” to the performance of an HEO, human resources have an added importance as source of knowledge. Results also suggest an ‘overlap’ between IC and performance indicators. Despite the validity of the interpretations provided in the context of the case study, generalization to other situations should only be conducted in a theoretically framed manner. This paper contributes to the development of IC research in a specific type of organization: an HEO. This empirical context is still underexplored, namely regarding the relationship between IC and performance. This study provides important managerial implications for HEOs and their members, who are concerned with its performance and competitiveness.