A Tradução intersemiótica em Lolita de Vladimir Nabokov e de Stanley Kubrik

O versão integral do nº1 da revista Polissema está disponível no link da versão do editor

Reason Maintenance Systems: Tools for Foundations-based Belief Revision

Dynamic and distributed environments are hard to model since they suffer from unexpected changes, incomplete knowledge, and conflicting perspectives and, thus, call for appropriate knowledge representation and reasoning (KRR) systems. Such KRR systems must handle sets of dynamic beliefs, be sensitive to communicated and perceived changes in the environment and, consequently, may have to drop current beliefs in face of new findings or disregard any new data that conflicts with stronger convictions held by the system. Not only do they need to represent and reason with beliefs, but also they must perform belief revision to maintain the overall consistency of the knowledge base. One way of developing such systems is to use reason maintenance systems (RMS). In this paper we provide an overview of the most representative types of RMS, which are also known as truth maintenance systems (TMS), which are computational instances of the foundations-based theory of belief revision. An RMS module works together with a problem solver. The latter feeds the RMS with assumptions (core beliefs) and conclusions (derived beliefs), which are accompanied by their respective foundations. The role of the RMS module is to store the beliefs, associate with each belief (core or derived belief) the corresponding set of supporting foundations and maintain the consistency of the overall reasoning by keeping, for each represented belief, the current supporting justifications. Two major approaches are used to reason maintenance: single-and multiple-context reasoning systems. Although in the single-context systems, each belief is associated to the beliefs that directly generated it—the justification-based TMS (JTMS) or the logic-based TMS (LTMS), in the multiple context counterparts, each belief is associated with the minimal set of assumptions from which it can be inferred—the assumption-based TMS (ATMS) or the multiple belief reasoner (MBR).

Strategic Drivers for Implementing Sustainability Programs in Portuguese Organizations– Let’s Listen to Aristotle: From Triple to Quadruple Bottom Line

This article describes a study that investigated the main strategic drivers that influence the implementation of sustainability/social responsibility programs. An online survey was administered to managers of Portuguese organizations with certified management systems. The findings suggest that the implementation of such programs is mainly correlated to: 1.) the approach to understanding and working toward the satisfaction of the community’s needs (in the broad sense of social responsibility); 2.) how systematically sustainability within the organization is identified and managed (e.g., pollution prevention, improved environmental performance, and compliance with the applicable environmental laws); and 3.) the degree to which the organization tries to understand the needs of the employees and works toward satisfying them. In addition to the survey, five interviews with top managers of the surveyed organizations provided some useful insights. There was no consensus on the meaning of sustainability and social responsibility: some described it as an instrumental approach for obtaining better organizational results, while others regarded it as the right thing to do (i.e., it is values driven). In all cases, however, the managers supported a kind of umbrella construct under which different size corporations use different models (for example, the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI), Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), ISO 14001 environmental management systems), although some managers reported that they simply do not know what to do. All of those surveyed agreed that the lack of a systematic approach could represent a major threat to their organization, making them willing to pay more attention and take more action on the issue of sustainability. An additional suggestion made by managers was to change from a triple bottom line (economic dimension, environmental dimension, social equity dimension) to a quadruple bottom line by adding another dimension: personal and family happiness. This fourth dimension was recognized by the Greek philosopher/thinker Aristotle (384-322 BCE) who thought of happiness as the highest good (virtue) and ultimate goal and purpose of life, achieved through living well, in harmony. Such harmony suggests a balance and a lack of excess—in other words a sustainable existence.

Análise de Soluções Construtivas no Âmbito do seu Desempenho Térmico

No presente relatório de estágio académico é mencionado o trabalho desenvolvido na empresa Civigest – Gestão de Projetos, Lda. por um período de seis meses, entre Dezembro de 2012 e Junho de 2013. O relatório que se apresenta é, antes de mais, o reflexo do produtivo período passado na empresa, na qual se executou diversificadas tarefas, atribuindo-se maior ênfase ao estudo e elaboração de projetos e fiscalização de empreitadas em todas as suas componentes. Procura-se pois abordar áreas de conhecimento que têm relacionamento direto com os projetos de engenharia civil. No âmbito do planeamento em empresas de projeto de engenharia, as previsões assumem-se como uma ferramenta incontornável para o cumprimento dos objetivos. A calendarização dos projetos e o esforço dos técnicos para o seu cumprimento são fundamentais, visto que as despesas fixas desta atividade prendem-se sobretudo com o custo de mão-de-obra. Incontornavelmente ligado ao departamento de estudos e projetos encontra-se o departamento de orçamentação, auxiliando os técnicos projetistas a optar por soluções que não comprometam os valores alvo da empreitada. O relatório de estágio descreve as atividades desenvolvidas nos vários departamentos da organização, com destaque para o departamento de fiscalização de empreitadas, que tem como principais objetivos a coordenação e gestão de obras envolvendo a elaboração e aprovação de autos de medição e autos de pagamento, a verificação do estrito cumprimento dos projetos, a promoção de alterações de melhoria de projeto, a verificação das especificações técnicas dos materiais e sua correta aplicação, bem como promover um bom relacionamento e diálogo entre as partes interessadas da empreitada. A passagem pelo departamento de fiscalização de empreitadas é fulcral para uma melhor perceção das dificuldades encontradas em obra. Por outro lado, o relatório aborda outra atividade relativa à análise de soluções construtivas, visando o desempenho térmico dos edifícios. Este é o conceito do relatório de estágio onde serão apresentados alguns casos de obras iniciadas na Civigest e posteriormente acompanhadas em obra. Relativamente a este ponto serão analisadas soluções de melhoria térmica. Com menor ênfase no trabalho, mas não menos importante, referir-se-á a profissão de coordenação de segurança em obra.