Comunicação médico-doente e consentimento informado em Portugal

Introdução – O consentimento informado (CI) para a realização de procedimentos médicos é influenciado pela comunicação entre o médico e o doente, ainda que se desconheça o impacto de alguns dos determinantes da comunicação entre estes dois intervenientes. Objetivo – Identificar e analisar os determinantes da comunicação entre o médico e o doente que influenciam o dever ético de informar para obter um CI. Métodos – Pesquisaram-se artigos de investigação originais, escritos em Portugal entre janeiro de 2005 e março de 2015, nas bases de dados eletrónicas Google Académico, PubMed, B-ON e no Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal, utilizando as palavras-chave ‘consentimento informado’, ‘médico’ e ‘doente‘ ou ‘informed consent’, ‘doctor’ e ‘patient’. Resultados – Identificaram-se cinco artigos que obedeciam aos critérios de inclusão e verificou-se a existência de determinantes da comunicação na relação médico-doente que influenciam o CI livre e esclarecido. Conclusão – O conhecimento da importância dos determinantes da comunicação que influenciem o CI pode ajudar na interação médico-doente e no desenvolvimento de medidas para melhorar a qualidade da prestação de cuidados de saúde.

Oncological patient anxiety in imaging studies: the PET/CT example

The purpose of this study was to investigate the subjective perception of anxiety pre- and post-procedure, and explore the relationship between demographic, clinical variables and cancer patients' anxiety during a positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan. Two hundred and thirty-two oncological out patients, with clinical indication for performing an (18)F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) PET/CT scan and attending a nuclear medicine (NM) department, participated in the study. Patients' anxiety and subjective experience of PET/CT were examined using two self-report questionnaires. The pre-procedure questionnaire focused on demographic information, level of knowledge regarding the scan and subjective perception of anxiety before the procedure. The post-procedure questionnaire included the subjective perception anxiety after the procedure, information adequacy and satisfaction with the NM department. The self-reported data indicate that patients were anxious during PET/CT. Furthermore, our data revealed a significant difference between the anxiety pre-procedure and post-procedure (z = -3909, p < 0.05), in which the anxiety pre-procedure has significantly higher values. No significant correlation was found between anxiety and age of the patients, education levels, adequacy of information or satisfaction with the NM Department. Perception of anxiety post-procedure differs between gender (U = 5641, p = 0.033). In conclusion, PET/CT generated anxiety levels in oncological patients, especially before the procedure. Although patients seemed to be satisfied with information delivered by staff and with the NM Department, attention has to be focused on effective interventions strategies that help patients to reduce anxiety.