The in vitro assessment of the synergistic effects of antibiotics and wound dressings on biofilms from diabetic foot pathogens

The impact of biofilm in the effective control of wound microbiome is an ongoing dilemma which has seen the use of different treatment strategies. The effects of wound dressings and antibiotics on both planktonic bacteria and biofilms have been separately evaluated in previous studies. In this current study, the combined antimicrobial effects of some selected wound dressings (silver-impregnated: Acticoat and Silvercel; and honey-impregnated: Medihoney™ Apinate) and antibiotics (ceftazdime and levofloxacin) on Klebsiella pneumoniae and Proteus mirabilis in their quasi-biofilm state were assessed using zone of inhibition (ZOI) test. Before the addition of the wound dressings, bacterial suspension of 108 colony forming units per mL and different concentrations of ceftazidime and levofloxacin (256, 512, 1024 and 5120µg/mL) of a final volume of 1mL were inoculated on Mueller Hinton agar and allowed to dry. Wound dressings cut into circular shapes (2cm diameter) were aseptically placed on the agar plates and incubated at 35 – 37°C for 24 hours. ZOIs associated with Acticoat, Silvercel and Medihoney™ Apinate dressings were compared with that of Atrauman (non-medicated control) dressing. All three dressings showed significant (p < 0.05) biofilm-inhibiting activity against both bacteria at antibiotic concentrations of 1024 and 5120µg/mL with ZOI between 17.5 and 35mm.

In Vitro Assessment of the Synergy between Polymyxin B (PMB) and Polymyxin B Nonapeptide (PMBN) and Antibiotics on Biofilms from Diabetic Foot Infections

Background: The increasing resistance of Gram-negative bacteria isolated from nosocomial infections and chronic wounds, such as diabetic foot ulcers has renewed research interests in the use of polymyxins in the treatment of multidrug resistant infections. The added resistance conferred by biofilm development in such infections and the absence of novel antibiotics presuppose that polymyxins are the likely drugs of choice in spite of their nephrotoxicity. The effects of PMB and PMBN have been previously assessed on planktonic bacteria isolated from various infections. Methods: This current study assessed the synergy between a PMB/PMBN and two antibiotics (ceftazidime and levofloxacin) in an attempt to develop a strategy for biofilm disruption using the Minimum Biofilm Eradication Concentration Physiology and Genetic assay (MBEC™ P & G, Innovotech Inc, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) and Proteus mirabilis (P. mirabilis) biofilms of initial broth suspensions of 108 colony forming units per mL, cultivated on the pegs of the MBEC device were challenged with 5120 µg/mL of both ceftazidime and levofloxacin in a ten-fold dilution assay and in the presence of 100 and 500 µg/mL PMB and PMBN. Results: From table of results (Table 1), it can be deduced that both ceftazidime and levofloxacin are very effective in inhibiting biofilm development (as shown by percentage inhibition (PI)) when augmented with PMB and PMBN. This is about 100-fold increase in efficacy when compared to the antibiotics used on their own. The percentage reduction (PR) in biofilm was also increased considerably when PMB and PMBN concentrations were increased to 500 µg/mL. PMB was more effective than its less antibacterial derivative PMBN. Levofloxacin was also found to be more effective than ceftazidime when combined with both PMB and PMBN due to its enhanced cell-membrane permeability and as an anti-DNA replication uncoupling agent. Conclusion: The above results indicate that the synergy between antibiotics and cell membrane permeabilising agents may provide alternate strategies towards biofilm eradication

Evaluation of the potential for virus dispersal during hand drying: a comparison of three methods

Aims To use a MS2 bacteriophage model to compare three hand-drying methods, paper towels (PT), a warm air dryer (WAD) and a jet air dryer (JAD), for their potential to disperse viruses and contaminate the immediate environment during use. Methods and Results Participants washed their gloved hands with a suspension of MS2 bacteriophage and hands were dried with one of the three hand-drying devices. The quantity of MS2 present in the areas around each device was determined using a plaque assay. Samples were collected from plates containing the indicator strain, placed at varying heights and distances and also from the air. Over a height range of 0.15-1.65 m, the JAD dispersed an average of >60 and >1300-fold more plaque-forming units (pfu) compared to the WAD and PT (P <0.0001), respectively. The JAD dispersed an average of >20 and >190-fold more pfu in total compared to WAD and PT at all distances tested up to 3 m (P <0.01), respectively. Air samples collected around each device 15 minutes after use indicated that the JAD dispersed an average of >50 and >100-fold more pfu compared to the WAD and PT (P <0.001), respectively. Conclusions Use of the JAD lead to significantly greater and further dispersal of MS2 bacteriophage from artificially contaminated hands when compared to the WAD and PT. Significance and Impact of Study The choice of hand drying device should be considered carefully in areas where infection prevention concerns are paramount, such as healthcare settings and the food industry.