1 resultado para ease of discovery
em Universidad de Alicante
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Karlstad University; Sweden) (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (17)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (6)
- Aston University Research Archive (39)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (4)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (12)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (14)
- Boston University Digital Common (4)
- Brock University, Canada (8)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (5)
- CaltechTHESIS (6)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (22)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (38)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (16)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (18)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (3)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (7)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (3)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (106)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (3)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (10)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (8)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (4)
- Duke University (4)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (14)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (4)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (4)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (47)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (10)
- Laboratório Nacional de Energia e Geologia - Portugal (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (4)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (5)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (18)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (3)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (53)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (139)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (6)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (7)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (4)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (68)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (3)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (12)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (5)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (23)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (20)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (38)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (12)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (3)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Empirical study on the maintainability of Web applications: Model-driven Engineering vs Code-centric
Resumo:
Model-driven Engineering (MDE) approaches are often acknowledged to improve the maintainability of the resulting applications. However, there is a scarcity of empirical evidence that backs their claimed benefits and limitations with respect to code-centric approaches. The purpose of this paper is to compare the performance and satisfaction of junior software maintainers while executing maintainability tasks on Web applications with two different development approaches, one being OOH4RIA, a model-driven approach, and the other being a code-centric approach based on Visual Studio .NET and the Agile Unified Process. We have conducted a quasi-experiment with 27 graduated students from the University of Alicante. They were randomly divided into two groups, and each group was assigned to a different Web application on which they performed a set of maintainability tasks. The results show that maintaining Web applications with OOH4RIA clearly improves the performance of subjects. It also tips the satisfaction balance in favor of OOH4RIA, although not significantly. Model-driven development methods seem to improve both the developers’ objective performance and subjective opinions on ease of use of the method. This notwithstanding, further experimentation is needed to be able to generalize the results to different populations, methods, languages and tools, different domains and different application sizes.