Culture Industries in a Postindustrial Age: Entertainment, Leisure, Creativity, Design

This article reviews the evolution of the concept of culture industries, when neither industry nor culture themselves are today what they were at the time when the term was coined. It attempts to explain the dilution of the term into more nebulous terms (“leisure industries,” “entertainment industries” or “creative industries”) and suggests new challenges for the research on culture industries. What is at stake is no longer an application of a Fordist production to culture, a one-directional mass communication and a mediation by experts, but rather: (1) a cultural experience which is no longer clearly separated from other activities (leisure in general, consumption and even work); (2) the communicative explosion of all industrial production in a media environment, where industrialized symbolic products are mixed with culturalized industrial products; and (3) the empowerment of the recipient, which on one hand ignores the traditional experts and on the other leads to post-productive (recreational and even creative) cultural practices.

¿Cómo estudiantes para profesor de matemáticas comprenden el aprendizaje del límite de una función?

En este estudio presentamos una investigación que tiene como objetivo generar información sobre cómo estudiantes para profesor de educación secundaria (EPS) comprenden el proceso de aprendizaje de las matemáticas. El contexto que hemos utilizado es la actividad de anticipar respuestas de los estudiantes de Bachillerato que reflejen diferentes niveles de desarrollo conceptual de la comprensión del concepto de límite de una función, como una actividad relevante vinculada a la competencia docente. Los resultados muestran dos formas distintas de considerar la comprensión del concepto de límite por parte de los EPS que tienen implicación sobre cómo anticipan las respuestas de los estudiantes y sobre las características de los problemas que plantean para apoyar el aprendizaje de la concepción dinámica de límite de los estudiantes.

Gender and health inequalities: intersections with other relevant axes of oppression

The risk of disease, disability, and mortality as well as access to health services are unfairly distributed among the population, with certain groups bearing an unequally larger burden of ill health and poorer access to care due to gender, sexual identity/orientation, ethnic background, or class. According to the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health (CSDH), these health inequalities emanate from socioeconomic and political factors (governance, cultural values, macroeconomic policies), which generate a set of socioeconomic positions in society according to which populations are stratified based on gender, ethnicity, education, income, or other factors. These societal inequalities influence people’s material and psychosocial circumstances as well as behavioral and biological factors, which in turn impact on health inequalities. Tackling gender, race/ethnic, and socioeconomic inequalities in society is thus recognized as the most powerful action to cope with unequal health risks distribution, and social innovations focusing on these ‘root causes’ are needed in order to prevent and stop endemic social inequalities and social exclusion in health within low-income as well as high-income countries. Increasing existing knowledge and making visible the health status of the most vulnerable and invisible groups are critical in order to contribute to this imperative challenge.