Differences in the post-translational modifications of human papillomavirus type 6b major capsid protein expressed from a baculovirus system compared with a vaccinia virus system

Virus-like particles (VLPs) are being currently investigated in vaccines against viral infections in humans. There are different recombinant-protein-expression systems available for obtaining the necessary VLP preparation for vaccination. However, the differences in post-translational modifications of the recombinant proteins obtained and their differences in efficacy in eliciting an anti-viral response in vaccines are not well established. In this study we have compared the posttranslational modifications of human papillomavirus type-6b major capsid protein L1 (HPV 6bL1) expressed using recombinant baculovirus (rBV) in Sf9 (Spodoptera frugiperda) insect cells, with the protein expressed using recombinant vaccinia virus (rVV) in CV-1 kidney epithelial cells, Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of biosynthetically labelled rBV-expressed HPV 6bL1 showed several post-translationally modified variants of the protein, whereas rVV-expressed HPV 6bL1 showed only a few variants. Phosphorylations were detected at threonine and serine residues for the L1 expressed from rBV compared with phosphorylation at serine residues only for the L1 expressed from rVV. HPV 6bL1 expressed using rBV incorporated [H-3]mannose and [H-3]galactose, whereas HPV 6bL1 expressed using rVV incorporated only [H-3]galactose. We conclude that post-translational modification of recombinant HPV 6bL1 can differ according to the system used for its expression. Since recombinant L1 protein is a potential human-vaccine candidate, the implication of the observed differences in post-translational modifications on immunogenicity of L1 VLPs warrants investigation.

Offspring size affects the post-metamorphic performance of a colonial marine invertebrate

The positive relationship between offspring size and offspring fitness is a fundamental assumption of life-history theory, but it has received relatively little attention in the marine environment. This is surprising given that substantial intraspecific variation in offspring size is common in marine organisms and there are clear links between larval experience and adult performance. The metamorphosis of most marine invertebrates does not represent a newbeginning, and larval experiences can have effects that carry over to juvenile survival and growth. We show that larval size can have equally important carryover effects in a colonial marine invertebrate. In the bryozoan Bugula neritina, the size of the non-feeding larvae has a prolonged effect on colony performance after metamorphosis. Colonies that came from larger larvae survived better, grew faster, and reproduced sooner or produced more embryos than colonies that came from smaller larvae. These effects crossed generations, with colonies from larger larvae themselves producing larger larvae. These effects were found in two populations (in Australia and in the United States) in contrasting habitats.

Comparison of tafenoquine (WR238605) and primaquine in the post-exposure (terminal) prophylaxis of vivax malaria) in Australian Defence Force personnel

On return from duty in North Solomons Province (including Bougainville Island), Papua New Guinea, 586 Australian Defence Force personnel received either primaquine (14-d) or tafenoquine (3-d) post-exposure malaria prophylaxis. Within 12 months, 6 of the 214 volunteers receiving primaquine and 7 of 378 receiving tafenoquine had developed vivax malaria. Overall, volunteers preferred the shorter course of tafenoquine.

A green stick or a fresh stick?: Locating customary penalties in the post-colonial era

Former colonies and dependencies in the South Pacific do not have the luxury of entirely ‘homegrown’ laws. Their legal systems are burdened with a ‘legacy’ of transplanted laws, developed for use in a foreign country, imposed on pre-existing systems of custom and culture. As a result, many small island countries are struggling to balance the demands of law from different sources, designed to operate in fundamentally different circumstances. In addition to the conflict that occurs in areas of substantive law, where customary and introduced law may prescribe a different rule for the same situation, the two systems differ in their approach to procedure, penalties and relief. This paper considers the divide between the theory and practice of introduced law and customary law and examines the way in which conflicts have been dealt with by the courts. In particular, it uses the example of banishment to illustrate the type of problems that arise in a plural system. The paper looks at the balancing exercise which has been necessary when custom, in the form of banishment, comes into conflict with introduced law, in the form of constitutional rights.