Student characteristics and academic success: An econometric study of the performance of "equity groups"

Like previous volumes in the Educational Innovation in Economics and Business Series, this book is genuinely international in terms of its coverage. With contributions from nine different countries and three continents, it reflects a global interest in, and commitment to, innovation in business education, with a view to enhancing the learning experience of both undergraduates and postgraduates. It should prove of value to anyone engaged directly in business education, defined broadly to embrace management, finance, marketing, economics, informational studies, and ethics, or who has responsibility for fostering the professional development of business educators. The contributions have been selected with the objective of encouraging and inspiring others as well as illustrating developments in the sphere of business education. This volume brings together a collection of articles describing different aspects of the developments taking place in today’s workplace and how they affect business education. It describes strategies for breaking boundaries for global learning. These target specific techniques regarding teams and collaborative learning, transitions from academic settings to the workplace, the role of IT in the learning process, and program-level innovation strategies. This volume addresses issues faced by professionals in higher and further education and also those involved in corporate training centers and industry.

Transdermal Pharmacology of Small Molecule Cyclic C5a Antagonists

Overproduction or underregulation of the proinflammatory complement component C5a has been implicated in numerous immune and inflammatory conditions. Therefore, targeting the C5a receptor (C5aR) has become an innovative strategy for antiinflammatory drug development. The novel cyclic peptide C5aR antagonist, AcF-[OP(D-Cha)WR] (PMX53), attenuates injury in numerous animal models of inflammation following intravenous, subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, and oral administration. In the present study the transdermal pharmacology of PMX53 and three analogs designed with increased lipophilicity, hydrocinnamate-[OP(D-Cha)WCit] (PMX200), AcF-[OP(D-Cha)WCit] (PMX201) and hydrocinnamate-[OP(D-Cha)WR] (PMX205), have been examined in order to assess their transdermal permeability and inhibitory effect on C5a-mediated lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced systemic responses. In the rat, PMX53, PMX201, and PMX205, were bioavailable following topical dermal administration (10 mg/50 cm(2) site/rat). All analogs functionally antagonized neutropenia and hypotension induced by systemic challenge with LPS (I mg/kg i.v.). Interestingly, PMX200 attenuated LPS-induced neutropenia more effectively than other analogs, despite undetectable (< 5 ng/ml) circulating levels following topical administration. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that cyclic peptide C5aR antagonists can penetrate transdermally sufficiently to have systemic effects. However, increasing lipophilicity in these compounds did not result in increased blood levels. Nonetheless, topical application of C5aR antagonists produced circulating levels of the drugs that antagonized the LPS-induced systemic responses of neutropenia and hypotension. This suggests that these small-molecule C5aR antagonists may be developed for topical administration for the treatment of local and systemic inflammatory conditions in the human and veterinary pharmaceutical markets.

Evaluation of short dietary questions from the 1995 National Nutrition Survey

Six of the short dietary questions used in the 1995 National Nutrition Survey (see box below) were evaluated for relative validity both directly and indirectly and for consistency, by documenting the differences in mean intakes of foods and nutrients as measured on the 24-hour recall, between groups with different responses to the short questions. 1. Including snacks, how many times do you usually have something to eat in a day including evenings? 2. How many days per week do you usually have something to eat for breakfast? 3. In the last 12 months, were there any times that you ran out of food and couldn’t afford to buy more? 4. What type of milk do you usually consume? 5. How many serves of vegetables do you usually eat each day? (a serve = 1/2 cup cooked vegetables or 1 cup of salad vegetables) 6. How many serves of fruit do you usually eat each day? (a serve = 1 medium piece or 2 small pieces of fruit or 1 cup of diced pieces) These comparisons were made for males and females overall and for population sub-groups of interest including: age, socio-economic disadvantage, region of residence, country of birth, and BMI category. Several limitations to this evaluation of the short questions, as discussed in the report, need to be kept in mind including: · The method for comparison available (24-hour recall) was not ideal (gold standard); as it measures yesterday’s intake. This limitation was overcome by examining only mean differences between groups of respondents, since mean intake for a group can provide a reasonable approximation for ‘usual’ intake. · The need to define and identify, post-hoc, from the 24-hour recall the number of eating occasions, and occasions identified by the respondents as breakfast. · Predetermined response categories for some of the questions effectively limited the number of categories available for evaluation. · Other foods and nutrients, not selected for this evaluation, may have an indirect relationship with the question, and might have shown stronger and more consistent responses. · The number of responses in some categories of the short questions eg for food security may have been too small to detect significant differences between population sub-groups. · No information was available to examine the validity of these questions for detecting differences over time (establishing trends) in food habits and indicators of selected nutrient intakes. By contrast, the strength of this evaluation was its very large sample size, (atypical of most validation studies of dietary assessment) and thus, the opportunity to investigate question performance in a range of broad population sub-groups compared with a well-conducted, quantified survey of intakes. The results of the evaluation are summarised below for each of the questions and specific recommendations for future testing, modifications and use provided for each question. The report concludes with some general recommendations for the further development and evaluation of short dietary questions.

Costimulatory molecules in human periodontal disease tissue

An immunoperoxidase technique was used to examine CD28, CD152, CD80 and CD86 positive cells in gingival biopsies from 21 healthy/gingivitis and 26 periodontitis subjects. The samples were placed into 3 groups (small, intermediate, large) according to the size of the infiltrate. The percent CD28+ T cells in the connective tissue infiltrates was highly variable with no differences between the healthy/gingivitis and periodontitis groups. While there was an increase in positive cells in intermediate infiltrates from both healthy/gingivitis (28.5%) and periodontitis (21.4%) patients compared with small infiltrates (8.6% and 11.8%, respectively), this was not significant, although the percent CD28+ T cells did increase significantly in tissues with increased proportions of B cells relative to T cells (p=0.047). A mean of less than 5% infiltrating T cells were CD152+ which was significantly lower than the mean percent CD28+ T cells in intermediate healthy/gingivitis lesions (p=0.021). The mean percent CD80+ and CD86+ B cells and macrophages was 1–7% and 8–16%, respectively, the difference being significant in intermediate healthy/gingivitis tissues (p=0.012). Analysis of these cells in relation to increasing numbers of B cells in proportion to T cells and also to macrophages, suggested that CD80 was expressed predominantly by macrophages while CD86 was expressed by both macrophages and B cells. Few endothelial cells expressed CD80 or CD86. Keratinocytes displayed cytoplasmic staining of CD80 rather than CD86 although the numbers of positive specimens in the healthy/gingivitis and periodontitis groups reduced with increasing inflammation. In conclusion, percentages of CD28, CD152, CD80 and CD86 did not reflect differences in clinical status. However, the percent CD28+ T cells increased with increasing size of infiltrate and with increasing proportions of B cells suggesting increased T/B cell interactions with increasing inflammation. The percent CD152+ cells remained low indicating that CD152 may not be involved in negative regulation of T cells in periodontal disease. CD80 and CD86 have been reported to promote Th1 and Th2 responses, respectively, and the higher percent CD86+ cells suggests a predominance of Th2 responses in both healthy/gingivitis and periodontitis tissues. Nevertheless, other factors including cytokines themselves and chemokines which modulate T cell cytokine profiles must be monitored to determine the nature of Th1/Th2 responses in periodontal disease.