4 resultados para Post-translational Modification
Resumo:
Abstract : Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are undesirable effects caused after administration of a single dose or prolonged administration of drug or result from the combination of two or more drugs. Idiosyncratic drug reaction (IDR) is an adverse reaction that does not occur in most patients treated with a drug and does not involve the therapeutic effect of the drug. IDRs are unpredictable and often life-threatening. Idiosyncratic reaction is dependent on drug chemical characteristics or individual immunological response. IDRs are a major problem for drug development because they are usually not detected during clinical trials. In this study we focused on IDRs of Nevirapine (NVP), which is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor used for the treatment of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infections. The use of NVP is limited by a relatively high incidence of skin rash. NVP also causes a rash in female Brown Norway (BN) rats, which we use as animal model for this study. Our hypothesis is that idiosyncratic skin reactions associated with NVP treatment are due to post-translational modifications of proteins (e.g., glutathionylation) detectable by MS. The main objective of this study was to identify the proteins that are targeted by a reactive metabolite of Nevirapine in the skin. The specific objectives derived from the general objective were as follow: 1) To implement the click chemistry approach to detect proteins modified by a reactive NVP-Alkyne (NVP-ALK) metabolite. The purpose of using NVP-ALK was to couple it with Biotin using cycloaddition Click Chemistry reaction. 2) To detect protein modification using Western blotting and Mass Spectrometry techniques, which is important to understand the mechanism of NVP induced toxicity. 3) To identify the proteins using MASCOT search engine for protein identification, by comparing obtained spectrum from Mass Spectrometry with theoretical spectrum to find a matching peptide sequence. 4) To test if the drug or drug metabolites can cause harmful effects, as the induction of oxidative stress in cells (via protein glutathionylation). Oxidative stress causes cell damage that mediates signals, which likely induces the immune response. The results showed that Nevirapine is metabolized to a reactive metabolite, which causes protein modification. The extracted protein from the treated BN rats matched 10% of keratin, which implies that keratin was the protein targeted by the NVP-ALK.
Resumo:
Introduction : Cet article présente un cas de psychothérapie de stress post-traumatique chez l’agresseur. Ce syndrome clinique est bien décrit dans la littérature, mais notre recherche ne nous a permis de trouver que 2 rapports de cas témoignant de son traitement en psychothérapie. Le traitement de cette population présente plusieurs défis. Un effort a dû être déployé pour réviser une littérature complexe. D’autres contraintes à notre démarche touchaient l’identification d’un sujet éligible, l’adaptation du protocole de psychothérapie à ce sujet et à au contexte de la pratique clinique, ainsi que l’administration du protocole en tenant compte de contraintes organisationnelles spécifiques. Méthode : Toutes les étapes du projet ont été dirigées par le premier auteur. Une revue de la littérature sur l’état de stress post-traumatique chez l’agresseur a été réalisée sous la supervision du deuxième auteur. Elle a été présentée au congrès annuel de l’Association des Médecins Psychiatres du Québec (AMPQ) de 2011. Cette expérience a permis une sensibilisation aux manifestations de ce syndrome clinique dans la pratique psychiatrique. Grâce à cela, un sujet hospitalisé a été identifié comme présentant des symptômes suggestifs d’état de stress post-traumatique chez l’agresseur. Une psychothérapie a été planifiée et administrée, à partir des connaissances acquises lors de la revue de la littérature, sous la supervision du troisième auteur. Le sujet a été sélectionné par échantillon de convenance. Les données colligées concernant l’évolution clinique du sujet sont de nature qualitative. La méthode d’intervention est une thérapie cognitivo-comportementale intensive, chez un patient hospitalisé. Une attention particulière a été portée au vécu subjectif de l’agresseur, tel que suggéré par la littérature. Un suivi a eu lieu en clinique externe par la suite, permettant de colliger des données supplémentaires. Résultats : L’évolution du sujet a été positive, se concluant par le désir de devenir un membre productif de la société. Conclusion : Un protocole de thérapie cognitivo-comportementale visant l’état de stress post-traumatique en général peut être adapté à la situation de l’agresseur. L’exercice d’être attentif à l’expérience subjective de l’agresseur permet de dépasser certains défis que présente son traitement. La psychothérapie peut être adaptée à la situation du patient hospitalisé en psychiatrie. L’ensemble de la démarche illustrée dans cet article représente un exemple concret d’application de principes scientifiques au traitement d’un sujet dont la présentation clinique ne correspond pas à un diagnostic pour lequel il existe un traitement bien établi. Nous invitons le lecteur clinicien à aborder les défis présentés par un cas clinique en formulant une question de recherche pertinente, qui pourra être mise à l’épreuve pendant la phase de traitement du patient. De plus, nous croyons que la rédaction d’une histoire de cas, organisée en fonction de ce principe, constitue un outil didactique précieux dans la formation en psychiatrie.
Resumo:
Background : Developmental coordination disorder (DCD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder. Best practices include raising parents’ awareness and building capacity but few interventions incorporating these best practices are documented. Objective : To examine whether an evidence-based online module can increase the perceived knowledge and skills of parents of children with DCD, and lead to behavioural changes when managing their child’s health condition. Methods : A mixed-methods, before-after-follow-up design guided by the theory of planned behaviour was employed. Data about the knowledge, skills and behaviours of parents of children with DCD were collected using questionnaires prior to completing the module, immediately after, and three months later. One-way repeated measures ANOVAs and thematic analyses were performed on data as appropriate. Results : Fifty-eight participants completed all questionnaires. There was a significant effect of time on self-reported knowledge [F(2.00,114.00)=16.37, p=0.00] and skills [F(1.81,103.03)=51.37, p=0.00] with higher post- and follow-up scores than pre-intervention scores. Thirty-seven (65%) participants reported an intention to change behaviour postintervention; 29 (50%) participants had tried recommended strategies at follow-up. Three themes emerged to describe parents’ behavioural change: sharing information, trialing strategies and changing attitudes. Factors influencing parents’ ability to implement these behavioural changes included clear recommendations, time, and ‘right’ attitude. Perceived outcomes associated with the parental behavioural changes involved improvement in well-being for the children at school, at home, and for the family as a whole. Conclusions : The online module increased parents’ self-reported knowledge and skills in DCD management. Future research should explore its impacts on children’s outcomes long-term.
Resumo:
Background : Developmental coordination disorder (DCD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder. Best practices include raising parents’ awareness and building capacity but few interventions incorporating these best practices are documented. Objective : To examine whether an evidence-based online module can increase the perceived knowledge and skills of parents of children with DCD, and lead to behavioral changes when managing their child’s health condition. Methods : A mixed-methods, before-after design guided by the theory of planned behavior was employed. Data about the knowledge, skills and behaviors of parents of children with DCD were collected using questionnaires prior to completing the module, immediately after, and three months later. Paired T-tests, sensitivity analyses and thematic analyses were performed on data as appropriate. Results: One hundred-sixteen, 81 and 58 participants respectively completed the three questionnaires. For knowledge and skills, post- and follow-up scores were significantly higher than baseline scores (p<0.01). Fifty-two (64%) participants reported an intention to change behavior post-intervention and 29 (50%) participants had tried recommended strategies at follow-up. Three themes emerged to describe parents’ behavioral change: sharing information, trialing strategies and changing attitudes. Factors influencing parents’ ability to implement these behavioral changes included clear recommendations, time, and ‘right’ attitude. Perceived outcomes associated with the parental behavioral changes involved improvement in well-being for the children at school, at home, and for the family as a whole. Conclusions : The online module increased parents’ self-reported knowledge and skills in DCD management. Future research should explore its impacts on children’s long-term outcomes.