Sociomuseologia e género: memória das mulheres artistas em Brasil e Portugal

Situamos a dissertação no campo científico da Gestão Cultural, selecionando como área de estudo a relação entre a Sociomuseologia e o Gênero e, como tema específico, o espaço das mulheres artistas em duas exposições museológicas recentes, ocorridas no Brasil(MARGS) e em Portugal(MFTPJ). Para realizar a comparação percorremos a história das mulheres artistas na sociedade até a sua condição atual, dentro das políticas para a igualdade de gênero e para os museus, destacando a importância da Sociomuseologia para o reconhecimento e a valorização das artistas no espaço museal. Ao analisar o lugar da mulher artista, dentro das exposições O Museu Sensível – uma visão da produção de artistas mulheres na coleção do MARGS e Museu no Feminino – mulheres artistas na coleção do MFTPJ, refletimos também sobre como a memória das mulheres artistas é preservada e promovida em cada país através de seus museus.

DPSIR framework application supported by integrated watershed modeling for irrigation from Alqueva dam (Portugal) on Guadiana river estuary

Dissertação de mest., Gestão da Água e da Costa, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade do Algarve, 2009

Arqueologia de emergência em Portugal

Dissertação mest., Teoria e Métodos da Arqueologia, Universidade do Algarve, 2007

Arqueologia e património subaquático: as relações entre ciência, estado e sociedade em Portugal

Dissertação mest., Arqueologia, Universidade do Algarve, 2008

Recreational shore fishing in southern Portugal: biological and socio-economic aspects and perspectives for management

Although overfishing is a concern for many fish stocks, it was for a long time only associated with commercial fishing exploitation, with less or no attention being given to the recreational fisheries. Recent research has shown however that the impact of recreational fishing on particular species can be considerable, and that the recreational harvest needs to be taken into account if fisheries are to be accurately assessed and effectively managed. In Portugal, the first recreational fishing regulations were only recently implemented. However, mirroring other European countries, regulations lacked scientific support, and specific knowledge of the activity was limited to a few studies with limited coverage. This thesis aimed to characterize the biological and socioeconomic aspects of the recreational shore angling activity in southern Portugal, to investigate whether the regulations in place were adequate and effective, and to provide recommendations for improved management and conservation of the inshore fisheries resources. A combined aerial-roving survey was conducted to gather data on fishing effort, catch, fishing trips and socioeconomic aspects (including anglers’ perceptions of regulations) of the recreational angling activity. The analysis of anglers’ catches suggested that compliance with daily bag limits was high, with less than 0.5% of creels exceeding the 10 kg angler-1 day-1 bag limit. Overall, 11.5% of the retained fishes were undersized, but non-compliance with minimum size limits was found to be high for some species (e.g. seabass, 73% undersized). In terms of the impact of recreational shore angling, the total estimated catches corresponded to less than 1% of the commercial landings for the same period (shared species). However, shore angling catches for white sea bream (Diplodus sargus) were found to be considerable, corresponding to 65% of the commercial landings (39.4% of total catch). In terms of anglers’ perceptions about the recreational fishing regulations in Portugal, the present study has shown that the majority of anglers accepted the existence of some kind of SRF regulations, but in general there was a partial or total disagreement with the recreational fishing restrictions recently put in place. Most anglers perceived themselves as not being involved in the decision-making process and claimed that some restrictions lacked a meaningful rationale (e.g. prohibition of fishing from piers/jetties). Fishers’ awareness with regard to specific aspects of the restrictions (such as the rationale for minimum size limits) was found to be very limited. During the same period, catches from sport fishing competitions were examined to test for differences with the recreational activity in terms of catches, and evaluate long term trends in catch and mean size of fish. Catches of the sport fishing competitions were found to be different from those observed for recreational fishing, being dominated by different species (e.g. garfish, mullets), and suggesting different fishing strategies of the the two types of anglers. High percentages of undersized fish were observed to be captured (and retained) during the competitions (in particular seabass, with 100% undersized), probably as a result of a single allowable minimum size (AMS) of 15 cm for all species in use in competitions. Lastly, catch and release fishing experiments were carried out to assess post-release mortality of three recreationally important species: two banded sea bream Diplodus vulgaris; black sea bream Spondyliosoma cantharus; and gilthead sea bream Sparus aurata. Post-release mortalities were found to be low (0-12%). The main predictor of mortality for Sparus aurata was anatomical hooking location, with 63% of the fishes that died being deeply hooked. The results support the release of fish, either from mandatory (e.g. minimum landing sizes) or voluntary practices. In summary, this thesis has demonstrated that the impact of recreational fishing for particular species is significant and needs to be taken into account for more effective management and stock assessment purposes. It has also highlighted several management issues that should be addressed in order to promote more adequate regulations in the future and prevent noncompliance issues. A periodic monitoring of the recreational fishing activity including all fishing modes (i.e. spear fishing, boat, and shore angling) would also be beneficial to ensure a timely knowledge on the global recreational fishing activity and support future management actions.

Leis da Política Nacional de Turismo do Brasil: uma perspectiva comparativa de sustentabilidade do outro lado do Atlântico

A regulação é apresentada como instrumento de uma política pública, neste caso, de uma política pública de turismo (GONZÁLEZ, 2004; OLIVEIRA, 2009; MACHADO, 2010). A sujeição desta a um princípio geral como a sustentabilidade, conforme art. 4º parágrafo único da Lei da Política Nacional de Turismo do Brasil (LPNTB) dá o mote para a investigação. É objetivo do artigo fazer uma análise comparativa entre as regulações constantes das leis-quadro das políticas públicas de turismo no Brasil e em Portugal, à luz de princípios funcionais comuns e sistémicos e, em particular, do princípio da sustentabilidade. A regulação do princípio da sustentabilidade no turismo, actividade, também, marcada por fortes princípios de sustentabilidade (OMT, 1999; RYAN, 2002; VALLS, 2004) implica que o Direito se adeque, enquanto instrumento, método, processo, dir-se-ia, como sistema (BENI, 2004; OLIVEIRA, 2004) adequado às especificidades do turismo, cujas políticas públicas estão funcionalizadas para fortes exigências de desenvolvimento económico e social. Para melhor compreensão, enriquecimento e conhecimento da regulação, enquanto instrumento de sustentabilidade, o autor recorre ao método comparado, justapondo os desenvolvimentos do princípio da sustentabilidade constantes da LPNTB com o princípio da sustentabilidade constante da Lei das Políticas Públicas de Turismo em Portugal (LPPTP). Assim, permite-se um apuramento e refinamento do sentido do princípio da sustentabilidade, através da deteção de pontes, homologias, funcionalidades idênticas e diferenças entre o sistema jurídico brasileiro e o português quanto à regulação fundamental de políticas públicas de turismo, permitindo-se uma melhor compreensão da sua funcionalidade, que se pretende o mais universal possível (OMT, 1999).