Molecular modeling of N-terminal domains of NMDA-receptor. Study of ligand binding with N-terminal domains

Using the molecular-graphic complex Sybyl6.7.2, computational construction of spatial models for N-terminal domains (of NR1- and NR2B-subunits) of NMDA-receptor was conducted. On the basis of the constructed models and also CoMFA method the conclusion is made about presence of the binding site for the compounds similar to iphenprodyl in two N-terminal domains of NR1- and NR2B-subunits. The obtained data can be used for constructing new ligands.

Structural basis for understanding structure-activity relationships for the glutamate binding site of the NMDA receptor

We present new homology-based models of the glutamate binding site (in closed and open forms) of the NMDA receptor NR2B subunit derived from X-ray structures of the water soluble AMPA sensitive glutamate receptor. The models were used for revealing binding modes of agonists and competitive antagonists, as well as for rationalizing known experimental facts concerning structure-activity relationships: (i) the switching between the agonist and the antagonist modes of action upon lengthening the chain between the distal acidic group and the amino acid moiety, (ii) the preference for the methyl group attached to the a-amino group of ligands, (iii) the preference for the D-configuration of agonists and antagonists, and (iv) the existence of "superacidic" agonists.

CoMFA and homology-based models of the glycine binding site of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor

Homology modeling was used to build 3D models of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor glycine binding site on the basis of an X-ray structure of the water-soluble AMPA-sensitive receptor. The docking of agonists and antagonists to these models was used to reveal binding modes of ligands and to explain known structure-activity relationships. Two types of quantitative models, 3D-QSAR/CoMFA and a regression model based on docking energies, were built for antagonists (derivatives of 4-hydroxy-2-quinolone, quinoxaline-2,3-dione, and related compounds). The CoMFA steric and electrostatic maps were superimposed on the homology-based model, and a close correspondence was marked. The derived computational models have permitted the evaluation of the structural features crucial for high glycine binding site affinity and are important for the design of new ligands.

Design of potent GlyT1 inhibitors: In vitro and in vivo profiles

Inhibitors of Gly transporter type-1 (GlyT1) for the treatment of schizophrenia have been pursued on the basis of the NMDA receptor (R) hypofunction hypothesis, which stems largely from the observation that NMDAR antagonists induce symptoms that more closely mimic those characteristic of schizophrenia than do other classes of psychotic agents. GlyT1 is responsible for uptake of synaptic Gly, an NMDAR co-agonist amino acid, in neuronal populations throughout the forebrain. GlyT1 inhibition thereby potentiates NMDAR activity by increasing synaptic Gly levels. Correspondingly, a large body of data suggests that GlyT1 inhibitors likely confer more comprehensive symptom alleviation than current antipsychotics. To date, a number of small-molecule GlyT1 inhibitors have been reported by the pharmaceutical industry. Developments in the discovery and characterization of GlyT1 inhibitors are discussed in this review.

Selectivity fields: comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) of the glycine/NMDA and AMPA receptors

An approach for evaluation of binding selectivity was suggested and exemplified using glycine/NMDA and AMPA receptors. For analyzing the pairwise selectivity, we propose to use the difference between biological activities (expressed as -log Ki) of ligands with respect to different receptor subtypes as a dependent variable for building comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) models. The resulting fields (which will be referred to as the "selectivity fields") indicate the ways of increasing selectivity of binding, inhibition, etc. As an example, CoMFA of a set of pyrazolo[1,5-c]quinazolines and triazolo[1,5-c]quinazolines was used for considering the binding selectivity with respect to glycine/NMDA and AMPA receptors. In addition, the mapping of these fields onto the molecular models of the corresponding receptors makes it possible to reveal the reasons for experimentally observed selectivity as well as to suggest additional ways of increasing selectivity.