121 resultados para Residential expansion

em QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast


Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Supplementation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) alleviates complications such as graft-versus-host disease, leading to a speedy recovery of hematopoiesis. To meet such clinical demand, a fast MSCs expansion method is required. In the present study, we examined the feasibility of expanding MSCs from the isolated bone marrow mononuclear cells using a rotary bioreactor system. The cells were cultured in a rotary bioreactor with Myelocult� medium containing a combination of supplementary factors, including stem cell factor (SCF), interleukin 3 and 6 (IL-3, IL-6). After 8 days of culture, total cell numbers, Stro-1+CD44+CD34- MSCs and CD34+CD44+Stro-1- HSCs were increased 9, 29, and 8 folds respectively. Colony forming efficiency-fibroblast per day (CFE-F/day) of the bioreactor-treated cells was 1.44-fold higher than that of the cells without bioreactor treatment. The bioreactor-expanded MSCs showed expression of primitive MSCs markers endoglin (SH2) and vimentin, whereas markers associated with lineage differentiation including osteocalcin (osteogenesis), Type II collagen (chondrogenesis) and C/EBPα (adipogenesis) were not detected. Upon induction, the bioreactor-expanded MSCs were able to differentiate into osteoblasts, chondrocytes and adipocytes. Taken together, we conclude that the rotary bioreactor with the modified Myelocult� medium reported in this study may be used to rapidly expand MSCs.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Objectives: To investigate the factors influencing the acceptability of hip protectors to residents of nursing and residential homes, especially the effect of hip protector type, and resident characteristics. Design: A randomised controlled trial with 12 weeks follow-up. Participants were randomised to receive either Safehips or HipSaverTM hip protectors. Setting/Participants: 109 residents aged 61 to 98 years from seven residential homes and two nursing homes in Northern Ireland. Main outcome measures: Percentage day-time use of the hip protectors over 12 weeks and ongoing use at 12 weeks. Results: 42% (119/285) of residents invited to enter the studyagreed to take part, and 109 started to wear the hip protectors. 43.1% (47/109) were still using them at 12 weeks. Mean percentage day-time use for all residents during 12 weeks was 48.6%. There was no significant difference in percentage day-time use (p=0.40), or use at 12 weeks (p=0.56) between the residents wearing Safehips and HipSaverTM protectors. Greater percentage daytime use of hip protectors was associated with being resident in a home for the elderlymentallyinfirm (75.1%, pp0.0005), having a low (12 or less) Barthel score (61.1%, pp0.0005), and having been injured in a fall in the last 12 months (57.3%, p=0.012). Conclusions: The type of hip protector appeared to make no difference to their continued use by residents. Residents with a historyof a fall and those who are physicallyand mentallyincapacitated appear to be more likelyto wear hip protectors. These residents, who are at high risk of falling, are also highlydependent on nursing staff. Efforts to increase hip protector use in residential and nursing home should focus on staff, who are in the best position to advise and influence residents and their relatives.