1 resultado para multi-method study
em QSpace: Queen's University - Canada
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberdeen University (3)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Karlstad University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (18)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (5)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (4)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (4)
- Archive of European Integration (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (40)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (13)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (111)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (8)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (2)
- Bioline International (3)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (82)
- Brock University, Canada (11)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (3)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (45)
- Centro Hospitalar do Porto (1)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (9)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (6)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (3)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (4)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (19)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (10)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (26)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (3)
- Duke University (6)
- Glasgow Theses Service (4)
- INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS ENERGÉTICAS E NUCLEARES (IPEN) - Repositório Digital da Produção Técnico Científica - BibliotecaTerezine Arantes Ferra (3)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (15)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (2)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (2)
- Nottingham eTheses (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (25)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (3)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- REPOSITÓRIO ABERTO do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (7)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (12)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (5)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (45)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (15)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (20)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (7)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (12)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (24)
- Universidade do Minho (2)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (3)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (13)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (3)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (61)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (8)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (22)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (50)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (8)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
Healthcare is unacceptably error prone. The question remains why, with 20 years of evidence, is error and harm reduction not being effective? While precise numbers may be debated, all stakeholders recognize the frequency of healthcare errors is unacceptable, and greater efforts to ensure safety must occur. In recent years, one of these strategies has been the inclusion of the patient and their family as partners in safety, and has been a required organizational practice of Accreditation Canada in many of their standard sets. Existing patient advisories created to encourage engagement, have typically not included patient perspectives in their development or been comprehensively evaluated. There are no existing tools to determine if and how a patient wants to be involved in safety engagement. As such, a multi-phased study was undertaken to advance our knowledge about the client’s and family’s role in promoting safety. Phase 1 of the study was a scoping review to methodically review the existing literature about patients’ and families’ attitudes, beliefs and behaviours about their involvement in healthcare safety. Phase 2 was designed to inductively explore how a group of patients in an Ontario, Canada, community hospital, describe healthcare safety and see their role in preventing error. The study findings, which include the narratives of 30 patients and 4 family members, indicate that although there are shared themes that influence a patient’s engagement in patient safety, every individual has unique, changing beliefs, experiences and reasons for involvement. Five conceptual themes emerged from their narratives: Personal Capacity, Experiential Knowledge, Personal Character, Relationships, and Meaning of Safety. These study results will be used to develop and test a pragmatic, accessible tool to enable providers a way to collaborate with patients for determining their personal level and type of safety involvement. The most ethical and responsible approach to healthcare safety is to consider every facet and potential way for improvement. This exploratory study provides fundamental insights into the complexity of patient engagement in safety, and evidence for future steps.