If People Were Kaleidoscopes: Sharpening the Resolution on Patient Engagement in Safety


Autoria(s): Duhn, LENORA
Contribuinte(s)

Queen's University (Kingston, Ont.). Theses (Queen's University (Kingston, Ont.))

Data(s)

12/10/2016

13/10/2016

13/10/2016

Resumo

Healthcare is unacceptably error prone. The question remains why, with 20 years of evidence, is error and harm reduction not being effective? While precise numbers may be debated, all stakeholders recognize the frequency of healthcare errors is unacceptable, and greater efforts to ensure safety must occur. In recent years, one of these strategies has been the inclusion of the patient and their family as partners in safety, and has been a required organizational practice of Accreditation Canada in many of their standard sets. Existing patient advisories created to encourage engagement, have typically not included patient perspectives in their development or been comprehensively evaluated. There are no existing tools to determine if and how a patient wants to be involved in safety engagement. As such, a multi-phased study was undertaken to advance our knowledge about the client’s and family’s role in promoting safety. Phase 1 of the study was a scoping review to methodically review the existing literature about patients’ and families’ attitudes, beliefs and behaviours about their involvement in healthcare safety. Phase 2 was designed to inductively explore how a group of patients in an Ontario, Canada, community hospital, describe healthcare safety and see their role in preventing error. The study findings, which include the narratives of 30 patients and 4 family members, indicate that although there are shared themes that influence a patient’s engagement in patient safety, every individual has unique, changing beliefs, experiences and reasons for involvement. Five conceptual themes emerged from their narratives: Personal Capacity, Experiential Knowledge, Personal Character, Relationships, and Meaning of Safety. These study results will be used to develop and test a pragmatic, accessible tool to enable providers a way to collaborate with patients for determining their personal level and type of safety involvement. The most ethical and responsible approach to healthcare safety is to consider every facet and potential way for improvement. This exploratory study provides fundamental insights into the complexity of patient engagement in safety, and evidence for future steps.

Thesis (Ph.D, Nursing) -- Queen's University, 2016-10-12 12:01:37.585

Identificador

http://hdl.handle.net/1974/15107

Idioma(s)

en

en

Relação

Canadian theses

Direitos

Queen's University's Thesis/Dissertation Non-Exclusive License for Deposit to QSpace and Library and Archives Canada

ProQuest PhD and Master's Theses International Dissemination Agreement

Intellectual Property Guidelines at Queen's University

Copying and Preserving Your Thesis

Creative Commons - Attribution - CC BY

This publication is made available by the authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced except as permitted by the copyright laws without written authority from the copyright owner.

Palavras-Chave #scoping review #patient safety #patient engagement #qualitative study
Tipo

Thesis