1 resultado para Récepteurs GABA
em Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (21)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (26)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (18)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (10)
- Bioline International (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (52)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (8)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (3)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (22)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (18)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (17)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (5)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (13)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (19)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (9)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (6)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (18)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (7)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (6)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (40)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (11)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (20)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (58)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (7)
- Scielo España (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (6)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (6)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (4)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (6)
- Universita di Parma (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (5)
- Université de Montréal (88)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (350)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (5)
- University of Michigan (1)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (29)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
The hypothesis that the same educational objective, raised as cooperative or collaborative learning in university teaching does not affect students’ perceptions of the learning model, leads this study. It analyses the reflections of two students groups of engineering that shared the same educational goals implemented through two different methodological active learning strategies: Simulation as cooperative learning strategy and Problem-based Learning as a collaborative one. The different number of participants per group (eighty-five and sixty-five, respectively) as well as the use of two active learning strategies, either collaborative or cooperative, did not show differences in the results from a qualitative perspective.