Cooperative or collaborative learning: Is there a difference in university students’ perceptions?
| Data(s) |
11/07/2016
|
|---|---|
| Resumo |
The hypothesis that the same educational objective, raised as cooperative or collaborative learning in university teaching does not affect students’ perceptions of the learning model, leads this study. It analyses the reflections of two students groups of engineering that shared the same educational goals implemented through two different methodological active learning strategies: Simulation as cooperative learning strategy and Problem-based Learning as a collaborative one. The different number of participants per group (eighty-five and sixty-five, respectively) as well as the use of two active learning strategies, either collaborative or cooperative, did not show differences in the results from a qualitative perspective. La hipótesis de que un mismo objetivo educativo planteado como aprendizaje cooperativo o colaborativo en enseñanza universitaria no afecta a la percepción que los estudiantes tienen de dicho modelo de aprendizaje, guía este trabajo. En él se analizan las reflexiones de dos grupos de estudiantes de ingeniería que compartieron los mismos objetivos educativos implementados a través de dos estrategias metodológicas activas diferentes de aprendizaje: la simulación como estrategia de aprendizaje cooperativo y el aprendizaje basado en problemas como estrategia colaborativa. El número distinto de participantes por grupo (ochenta y cinco frente a sesenta y cinco, respectivamente) así como el uso de dos estrategias de aprendizaje activas, bien colaborativa o cooperativa, no arrojaron diferencias en los resultados del análisis cualitativo. |
| Formato |
application/pdf |
| Identificador |
http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RCED/article/view/47398 10.5209/rev_RCED.2016.v27.n3.47398 |
| Publicador |
Ediciones Complutense |
| Relação |
http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RCED/article/view/47398/48822 /*ref*/Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. (2000). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Baltimore, MD: Anthor. /*ref*/Agapiou, A. (2006). The Use and Evaluation of a Simulation Game to teach Professional Practice Skills to Undergraduate Architecture Students. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 1(1), 3-14. /*ref*/Aliah, F., Mohd-Yusof, Kh., Helmi, S. & Hassim, M. (2012). Engineering Students’ Perceptions on Learning through Cooperative Problem-based Learning for the First Time. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference, 1-17. Retrieved from http://www.asee.org/public/conferences/8/papers/2957/view (10 October 2013) /*ref*/Andreu-Andrés, M.A. & García-Casas, M. (2010). Problem-based learning applied to LSP. Ibérica, 19, 33-54. Retrieved from http://www.aelfe.org/documents/02_19_Andreu.pdf (22 June 2011) /*ref*/Barkley, E.F., Cross, K.P. & Major C. H. (2005). Collaborative Learning Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty. San Francisco, CA., Jossey-Bass. /*ref*/Blake, C. & Scanlon, E. (2007). Reconsidering simulations in science education at a distance: features of effective use. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 491-502. /*ref*/Bouhuijs, P. (2011). Implementing Problem-based Learning. Why is it so hard? REDU, 9(1), 17-24. Retrieved from http://redaberta.usc.es/redu/index.php/REDU/article/view/190/164 (10 January 2012) /*ref*/Bradley, P. (2006). The history of simulation in medical education and possible future directions. Medical Education, 40, 254-262. /*ref*/Bridges, A. (2007). Problem-based Learning in Architectural Education. Proceedings of CIB 24th W78 Conference Maribor 2007. CIB (International Council for Building). Retrieved from http://itc.scix.net/data/works/att/w78-2007-116-049-Bridges-b.pdf (1 July 2011) /*ref*/Brindley, J.E., Walti, C., & Blaschke, L.M. (2009). Creating effective collaborative learning groups in an online environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3), 1-9. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/675/1271 (15 March 2012) /*ref*/Bruffee, K.A. (1995). Sharing our toys: Cooperative learning versus collaborative learning. Change, 27, 12-18. /*ref*/Brundiers, K., Wiek, A. & Redman, C. L. (2010). Real-world learning opportunities in sustainability: from classroom into the real world. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(4), 308-324. /*ref*/Cameron, B.J. (1999). Active Learning: Green Guide 2. Halifax, Nova Scotia, Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. /*ref*/Coppola, B. P. (1996). Progress in Practice: Exploring the Cooperative and Collaborative Dimensions of Group Learning. The Chemical Educator, 1(1). Retrieved from http://chemeducator.org/sbibs/s0001001/spapers/11cop897.htm (12 July 2008) /*ref*/Cotner, S., Loper, J., Walker, D. and Brooks Ch. (2013). It’s not you, it’s the room. Are the High-Tech, active learning classrooms worth it? Research and Teaching 42(6), 82-88. /*ref*/Crookall, D. (2010). Serious Games, Debriefing, and Simulation/Gaming as a Discipline. Simulation and Gaming, 41(6), 898-920. /*ref*/Chang, C. (2012a). Exploring an experiential learning project through Kolb’s Learning Theory using a qualitative research method. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(4), 405-415. /*ref*/Chan, C. (2012b). Identifying and understanding the graduate attributes learning outcomes in a case study of community service experiential learning project. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 22 (1–2), 148–159. /*ref*/Chung, E., Hitchcock, M., Oh, S., Han, E., & Woo, Y. (2011). The relationship between student perception of tutor performance and tutors’ background in problem-based learning in South Korea. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 7-11. /*ref*/DeRosa, D., & Lepsinger, R. (2010). Virtual team success: A practical guide for working and leading from a distance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. /*ref*/Dooly, M. (2008). Constructing Knowledge Together. In M. Dooly (Ed.). Telecollaborative Language Learning. A guidebook to moderating intercultural collaboration online (pp. 21-34). Bern: Peter Lang. /*ref*/Falls, I., Bahhouth, V., Chuang, Ch. & Bahhouth, J. (2014). Factor influencing Students’ Perceptions of Online Teamwork. Sage OPEN, January-March 2014, 1-9. Retrieved from http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/4/1/2158244014525415 (2 January 2014) /*ref*/Faria, A.J., Hutchinson, D., Wellington, E.J. & Gold, S. (2009). Developments in Business Gaming: A Review of the Past 40 Years. Simulation & Gaming, 40, 464-487. /*ref*/Felder, R.M. (2012). Engineering Education: A Tale of Two Paradigms. In McCabe, B., Pantazidou, M., and Phillips, D., (Eds.). Shaking the Foundations of Geo-Engineering Education (pp. 9–14). Leiden: CRC Press. /*ref*/Felder, R.M. & Brent, R. (2005). Understanding student differences. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 57-72. /*ref*/Felder, R.M. & Hadgraft, R. (2013). Educational practice and educational research in engineering: partners, antagonists, or ships passing in the night? Journal of Engineering Education, 102(3), 339–345. /*ref*/Flick, U. (2002). Qualitative Research – State of the Art. Social Sciences Information, 41(1), 5-24. /*ref*/Freeman, S., Eddy, S., McDonough, M., Smith, M., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H. and Wenderoth, M. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering and mathematics. PNAS, 111(23), 8410-8415. /*ref*/Gaba, D. (2004). The Future of Simulation in Healthcare. Qual. Saf. Health Care, 13, 2-10. /*ref*/García-Carbonell, A. & Watts, F. (2009). Simulation and Gaming Methodology in Language Acquisition. In Guillén-Nieto (Ed.) Intercultural Business Communication and Simulation and Gaming Methodology (pp. 285-316). Oxford: Peter Lang. /*ref*/García- Carbonell, A., Watts, F. & Andreu-Andrés, M.A. (2012). Simulación telemática como experiencia de aprendizaje de la lengua inglesa. REDU, 10(3), 301-323. Retrieved from http://www.red-u.net/redu/index.php?journal=REDU&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=340 (21 January 2014). /*ref*/García-Carbonell, A., Andreu-Andrés, M.A. & Watts, F. (2014). Simulation and Gaming as the Future’s Language of Language Learning and Acquisition of Professional Competences. In Duke and Kriz (Eds.) Back to the Future of Gaming (pp. 214-227). Germany: WB Verlag,. /*ref*/Gaudart, H. (1999). Games as teaching Tools for Teaching English to Speakers of other Languages. Simulation and Gaming, 30(3), 282-291. /*ref*/Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266. /*ref*/Jacob, T. (1997). Collaborative learning. Small group learning page, College One Level Team, National Institute of Science Education, University of Wisconsin. Retrieved from http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/ARCHIVE/CL1/CL/que stion/TQ13.htm (8 September 2010) /*ref*/Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company. /*ref*/Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. & Smith, K.A. (1991). Cooperative Learning: Increasing College Faculty Instructional Productivity. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4, George Washington University. /*ref*/Jonassen, D. (2011). Supporting Problem Solving in PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 5(2), 95-112. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1256 (3 July 2013). /*ref*/Jones, K. (1995). Simulations. A handbook for teachers and trainers. London: Kogan Page. /*ref*/Joung, S. & Keller, J. (2004). The effects of high-structure cooperative versus low-structure collaborative design of decision change, critical thinking and interaction pattern during online debates. On the practice of educational communications and technology. Chicago: ERIC, 316-320. /*ref*/Kayes, A.B., Kayes, D. Ch. & Kolb, D.A. (2005). Experiential learning in teams. Simulation and Gaming, 36, 330-354. /*ref*/Kessler, C. (1992). Cooperative language learning: a teacher’s resource book. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents. /*ref*/Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall. /*ref*/Kingsland, A. J. (1989). The assessment process in architecture at Newcastle (pp. 121-130). In Wallis (Ed.) Problem-based learning: The Newcastle workshop. Newcastle: Faculty of Medicine, University of Newcastle. /*ref*/Kolb, A. & Kolb, D. (2009). The Learning Way: Meta-cognitive Aspects of Experiential Learning. Simulation & Gaming, 40(3), 297-327 /*ref*/Laal, M., & Laal, M. (2012). Collaborative learning: what is it? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 491-495. /*ref*/Labrador-Piquer, M.J. & Andreu-Andrés, M.A. (2008). Metodologías Activas. Valencia: Editorial UPV. /*ref*/Lauridsen, B. (2012). Problem-based Learning applied to Team Environments: A Visual Literature Review. TCC Proceeding. http://etec.hawaii.edu/proceedings/2012/lauridsen.pdf /*ref*/Law, Y. (2011). The effects of cooperative learning on enhancing Hong Kong fifth graders’ achievement goals, autonomous motivation and reading proficiency. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(4), 402–425. /*ref*/Leemkuil, H., de Jong, T., de Hoog, R. & Christoph, N. (2003). KM QUEST: A collaborative Internet-based simulation game. Simulation & Gaming, 31(1), 89-111. /*ref*/Lingard, R. W. (2010). Teaching and assessing teamwork skills in engineering and computer science. Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 18(1), 34-37. /*ref*/Machika, P. & Abrahams, Ch. (2014). Problem-based learning in Construction Engineering within a South African Context. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 3(1), 69-82. /*ref*/Masters, J. (1955). The History of Action Research. In Hughes (Ed.) Action Research Electronic Reader. The University of Sydney, on-line Accessed 2 January 2009 from http://www.behs.cchs.usyd.edu.au/arow/Reader/rmasters.htm /*ref*/Mayo, M.J. (2007). Games for Science and Engineering Education. Communications of the ACM, 50(7), 30-35. /*ref*/Meijers, A. & den Brok, P. (2013). Engineers for the Future. An essay on education at TU/e in 2030. Eindhoven: University of Technology. Retrieved from http://www.tue.nl/uploads/media/TUE_Vision_of_Education_2013.pdf (5 June 2014). /*ref*/Michel, N., Cater, J. & Varela, O. (2009). Active versus passive teaching styles: an empirical study of student learning outcomes. Small Business Institute, vol. 33(1), 55-67. /*ref*/Mikel, G. (2003). ESL Teachers' Views on Visual Language. A Grounded Theory. The Reading Matrix, 3(3), 137-168. /*ref*/Min, R. (2004). Designing dynamical learning environments for simulation: Micro-worlds applets on the World Wide Web (pp. 57-69). In Niegemann, Leutner & Bruncken (Eds.) 6th Proceedings of EARLI, SIG . Munchen: Waxman. Retrieved from http://projects.edte.utwente.nl/pi/papers/AbstractErfurt.htm (1 April 2011). /*ref*/Montero-Fleta, B. (2013). Enhancing Innovation Competences through a research-based simulation: From Framework to Hands-on Experience. Porta-Linguarum, 20, 239-252. /*ref*/Moust, J., Bouhuijs, P.A.J. & Schmidt, H.G. (2007). El aprendizaje basado en problemas: guía del estudiante. Cuenca: Ediciones de la Universidad de Castilla‐La Mancha. /*ref*/Myers, S., Bogdan, L., Eidsness, M., Johnson, A., Schoo, M., Smith, N., & Zackery, B. (2009). Taking a trait approach to understanding college students’ perception of group work. College Student Journal, 43, 22-831. /*ref*/Neville, D. & Britt, D. (2007). A Problem-based Learning Approach into Integrating Foreign Languages to Engineering. Foreign Language Annals, 40(2), 226-246. /*ref*/Northwood, M.D., Northwood, D.O. & Northwood, M.G. (2003). Problem-based Learning (PBL): From the Health Sciences to Engineering to Value-Added in the Workplace. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 7(2), 157-164. /*ref*/Oakley, B. Felder, R.M., Brent, R. & Elhajj, I. (2004). Turning Student Groups into Effective Teams. Journal of Student Centered Learning, 2(1), 9-34. /*ref*/Oxford, R. (1997). Cooperative Learning, Collaborative Learning, and Interaction: Three Communicative Strands in the Language Classroom. Modern Language Journal 81, 443-56. /*ref*/Panitz, Th. (1999). Collaborative versus cooperative learning: A comparison of the two concepts which will help us understand the underlying nature of interactive learning. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED448443.pdf (28 October 2014). /*ref*/Passow, H.J. (2012). Which ABET Competencies do Engineering Graduates Fid most Important in their Work? Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 95-118. /*ref*/Pfeiffer, J.W. (1994). Theories and Models in Applied Behavioral Science, 2. San Diego, California: Pfeiffer & Company. /*ref*/Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231. /*ref*/Rideout, E. & Carpio, B. (2001). The Problem Based Learning Model of Nursing Education. In Rideout (Ed.) Transforming Nursing Education through PBL (pp. 21-50). Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers. /*ref*/Savery, J.R. (2006). Overview of Problem-based Learning: Definitions and Distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 9-20. /*ref*/Smith, K.A. (2011). Cooperative Learning: Lessons and Insights from Thirty Years of Championing a Research-Based Innovative Practice. 41st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 1-7. Retrieved from http://personal.cege.umn.edu/~smith/docs/Smith-FIE-CL-1240-10-draft.pdf (12 September 2013). /*ref*/Smith, M., Duncan, M. & Cook, K. (2013). Graduate Employability: Student Perceptions of PBL and its Effectiveness in Facilitating their Employability Skills. Practice and Evidence of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 8(3), 217-240. /*ref*/Smith, K.A., Sheppard, Sh. D., Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R. (2005). Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 87-101. /*ref*/Smith, G.G., Sorensen, C., Gump, A., Heindel, A.J., Caris, M., & Martinez, C.D. (2011). Overcoming student resistance to group work: Online versus face-to-face. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 121-128. /*ref*/Strauss, A.L. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press. /*ref*/Stump, G.S., Hilpert, J.C., Husman, J. Chung, W.T. & Kim, W. (2011). Collaborative Learning in Engineering Students: Gender and Achievement. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3), 475-497. /*ref*/Sulaiman, F. (2011). Students’ Perceptions on the Suitability of Implementing an Online Problem-based Learning in Physics Course. Malaysian Journal of Educational Technology, 11(1), 5-13. /*ref*/Thiagarajan, S. (1992). Using games for debriefing. Simulation and Gaming. An International Journal, 23(2), 161-173. /*ref*/Watts, F., García-Carbonell, A. & Rising, B. (2011). Student Perceptions of Collaborative Work in Telematic Simulation. Journal of Simulation/Gaming for Learning and Development, 1(1), 1-12. /*ref*/Watts, F. García-Carbonell, A., Andreu-Andrés, M.A., Stange, Ch. and Helker, H. (2013). Assessment of Innovation Competence. In Lehto, A. & Penttilä (Eds.) Pedagogical Views on Innovation Competence and Entrepreneurship (pp. 44-56). Turku: University of Applied Sciences. Retrieved from http://julkaisumyynti.turkuamk.fi/filemanager/productfiled/1227file1Upload.pdf#page=45 (13 January 2014). /*ref*/Wester, F. & Peters, V. (2001). An Introduction to the Principles and Practice of our Method of Qualitative Analysis. In P. Pieterse (Ed.) Desmond Tutu's Message. A Qualitative Analysis (pp. 112-136). Boston: Brill. /*ref*/Woods, D.R. (1996). Problem-based Learning for Large Classes in Chemical Engineering. In Wilkerson & Gijiselaers (Ed.) Bringing Problem-based Learning to Higher Education: Theory and Practice (pp. 91-100). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. /*ref*/Yesilyurt, E. (2009). The views of students on the effect of cooperative learning on student behaviours. Fırat University Journal of Social Science, 19(2), 161-178. |
| Direitos |
Revista Complutense de Educación es una revista de acceso abierto, que significa que todo el contenido está disponible gratuitamente, sin cargo alguno para el usuario o su institución. Los usuarios pueden leer, descargar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, buscar o enlazar los textos completos de los artículos de esta revista sin pedir permiso previo del editor o del autor. Esto está de acuerdo con la definición BOAI de acceso abierto. Los artículos a texto completo incluidos en Revista Complutense de Educación son de acceso libre y se distribuyen bajo una licencia de Creative Commons de Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)http:// http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es_ES. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación con fines comerciales requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito del editor. |
| Fonte |
Revista Complutense de Educación; Vol 27, No 3 (2016); 1041-1060 |
| Palavras-Chave | #Educación; Enseñanza universitaria; Aprendizaje; Métodos de enseñanza #collaborative; cooperative; experiential learning; engineering education #colaborativo; cooperativo; aprendizaje a través de la experiencia; estudios de ingeniería |
| Tipo |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
