Censura preventiva o repressiva? Note di Pasquale Galluppi sulla legge del 26 luglio 1820 del Regno di Sicilia

Se examina en el presente trabajo la difusión y reacciones provocadas por un escrito aparecido en los convulsos años 1820-1821 para el Reino de las Dos Sicilias, en donde se pone de manifiesto la necesidad de la libertad de prensa (el Opuscolo de P. Galluppi es el hilo conductor del trabajo), texto elaborado a propósito de la ley reguladora de esa libertad indispensable para la construcción del Estado liberal y para el surgimiento de la opinión pública al mismo tiempo que dicho escrito activa la labor de la censura en su doble papel de represión y punición, en unos tiempos en donde el Liberalismo no había acabado de asentarse y el Absolutismo se negaba a desaparecer.

Territorial and demographic aspects of the Networks of Protected Natural Areas of Castilla-La Mancha: 1978-2014

The Autonomous Region of Castilla-La Mancha develops from the approval of the Spanish Constitution a whole executive and legislative branch to implement its policies on environmental protection. The new legislation (Law 9/1999, of 26 May) has pursued the conservation and the integral protection of the natural elements of the territory demanding to new criteria as such the environmental quality of ecosystems or the exceptional landscape. The spread and the declaration of new natural spaces have caused a double geographical and territorial model. First, natural spaces located in rural mountainous areas with depopulation and aging problems. And second, natural spaces situated in areas densely populated

Humanism is a violence typical of the beasts. Philosozing with a Hammer, using Levinas and Derrida, the Measure of the Human and the Human as a measure

Levinas’s reflections arose as a critique of traditional philosophy which, since it was based on presence and identity, leads to the exclusion of the other. Instead of an onto-logical thought the Lithuanian proposes that the ipseity of the human being be constituted by alterity, and that it be so ethically, because the subject is sub-ject, that is, that which upholds, responsibility. In an attempt to take the obligatory attention to the otherness of the other even further, Derrida would develop a radical critique of the Levinasian posture. Deconstruction of every trace of ipseity and sovereignty in the relationship with the other, the reading that we have done of the work of Derrida opts for a no definable understanding of the human. That is why every de-limitation of an ethical field as a properly human implies a brutal violence that the levinasian humanism of the other tried to exceed.