1 resultado para Employability skills
em Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (15)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (2)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (3)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (5)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (10)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (6)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (8)
- Brock University, Canada (26)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (13)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (56)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (6)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (232)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (4)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (9)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (5)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (89)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (147)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (195)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (12)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (5)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (26)
- SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (3)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (4)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (2)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (43)
- University of Washington (2)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (8)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
The hypothesis that the same educational objective, raised as cooperative or collaborative learning in university teaching does not affect students’ perceptions of the learning model, leads this study. It analyses the reflections of two students groups of engineering that shared the same educational goals implemented through two different methodological active learning strategies: Simulation as cooperative learning strategy and Problem-based Learning as a collaborative one. The different number of participants per group (eighty-five and sixty-five, respectively) as well as the use of two active learning strategies, either collaborative or cooperative, did not show differences in the results from a qualitative perspective.