1 resultado para 290601 Chemical Engineering Design
em Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha
Filtro por publicador
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (2)
- Archive of European Integration (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (16)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (25)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (74)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (13)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (31)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (21)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (2)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (6)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (4)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (17)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (52)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (7)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (3)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (2)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (7)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (24)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (3)
- Duke University (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (2)
- Instituto Politécnico de Leiria (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (23)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (6)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (2)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (3)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (4)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (9)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Institucional da UFLA (RIUFLA) (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Almería (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (62)
- Royal College of Art Research Repository - Uninet Kingdom (4)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (11)
- Universidad de Alicante (60)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (17)
- Universidade de Madeira (1)
- Universidade do Minho (8)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (11)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (4)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (4)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (14)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (3)
- University of Connecticut - USA (3)
- University of Michigan (68)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (292)
- University of Washington (11)
Resumo:
The hypothesis that the same educational objective, raised as cooperative or collaborative learning in university teaching does not affect students’ perceptions of the learning model, leads this study. It analyses the reflections of two students groups of engineering that shared the same educational goals implemented through two different methodological active learning strategies: Simulation as cooperative learning strategy and Problem-based Learning as a collaborative one. The different number of participants per group (eighty-five and sixty-five, respectively) as well as the use of two active learning strategies, either collaborative or cooperative, did not show differences in the results from a qualitative perspective.