Learning for self-regulation: Improving instructional benefits for pupils, teachers, parents, schools, and society at large

Compulsory education laws oblige primary and secondary schools to give each pupil positive encouragement in, for example, social, emotional, cognitive, creative, and ethical respects. This is a fairly smooth process for most pupils, but it is not as easy to achieve with others. A pattern of pupil, home or family, and school variables turns out to be responsible for a long-term process that may lead to a pupil���s dropping out of education. A systemic approach will do much to introduce more clarity into the diagnosis, potential reduction and possible prevention of some persistent educational problems that express themselves in related phenomena, for example low school motivation and achievement; forced underachievement of high ability pupils; concentration of bullying and violent behaviour in and around some types of classes and schools; and drop-out percentages that are relatively constant across time. Such problems have a negative effect on pupils, teachers, parents, schools, and society alike. In this address, I would therefore like to clarify some of the systemic causes and processes that we have identified between specific educational and pupil characteristics. Both theory and practice can assist in developing, implementing, and checking better learning methods and coaching procedures, particularly for pupils at risk. This development approach will take time and require co-ordination, but it will result in much better processes and outcomes than we are used to. First, I will diagnose some systemic aspects of education that do not seem to optimise the learning processes and school careers of some types of pupils in particular. Second, I will specify cognitive, social, motivational, and self-regulative aspects of learning tasks and relate corresponding learning processes to relevant instructional and wider educational contexts. I will elaborate these theoretical notions into an educational design with systemic instructional guidelines and multilevel procedures that may improve learning processes for different types of pupils. Internet-based Information and Communication Technology, or ICT, also plays a major role here. Third, I will report on concrete developments made in prototype research and trials. The development process concerns ICT-based differentiation of learning materials and procedures, and ICT-based strategies to improve pupil development and learning. Fourth, I will focus on the experience gained in primary and secondary educational practice with respect to implementation. We can learn much from such practical experience, in particular about the conditions for developing and implementing the necessary changes in and around schools. Finally, I will propose future research. As I hope to make clear, theory-based development and implementation research can join forces with systemic innovation and differentiated assessment in educational practice, to pave the way for optimal ���learning for self-regulation��� for pupils, teachers, parents, schools, and society at large.

Serious gaming: wondermiddel of luchtkasteel?

Games voor onderwijs en training worden een serieuze zaak. Marktprognoses melden een jaarlijkse groei van 18% tot een wereldwijd volume van meer dan 5 miljard Euro in 2020. Games bieden leerlingen een virtuele praktijk, waarin ze actief kunnen oefenen. Studietaken worden levensechte uitdagingen die tot indringende leerervaringen leiden. Dat schept nieuwe mogelijkheden juist in het MBO, waar praktische ervaring vaak belangrijker is dan theoretische kennis. Deze sessie geeft een snelle update over serious games. Diverse game-mechanismen worden besproken aan de hand van actuele voorbeelden.

Naar verantwoorde zelfregulatie in opvoeding, onderwijs en diagnostiek.

De beoordeling van vorderingen en inzet van (extra) diagnostiek ('indicatiestelling') in het onderwijs kunnen de kans op het ontstaan van problemen bij een kind vergroten. Tijdige herkenning en preventieve ondervanging van de problemen vragen veranderingen in de inhoudelijke, evaluatieve, didactisch-organisatorische en diagnostische systematieken in en rond scholen. Daarom wordt gewerkt aan de opbouw van een inhoudelijk integrerende, pedagogisch-didactische kernstructuur (PDKS). Deze helpt de dialoog en samenwerking tussen opvoedeling(en) of leerling(en), opvoeder(s), leerkracht(en) en andere professionals eenduidig in te richten en te optimaliseren. Didactisch-organisatorische steun wordt verleend door passende software in de vorm van 'Diagnostische, Instructie en Management Systemen' (DIMS). De beoogde veranderingen worden samen met leerkrachten en schoolleidingen ontwikkeld en proefondervindelijk gerealiseerd in enkele scholen voor primair onderwijs. De schoolontwikkeling biedt de contextuele condities ter realisatie van 'verantwoorde zelfregulatie' van elk kind of elke leerling. Dit wordt toegelicht in verschillende praktijkvoorbeelden. Ook worden volgende ontwikkelingen geschetst.