Conjunctival Autograft Alone or Combined With Adjuvant Beta-Radiation? A Randomized Clinical Trial

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of postoperative low single-dose of beta-irradiation (beta-RT) in pterygium comparing conjunctival autograft (CAG) surgery with CAG plus adjuvant beta-RT in a randomized clinical trial. Methods: This trial was designed as a prospective, randomized, single-center study. Surgery was performed in all cases according to the CAG technique. One hundred and eight pterygia were post-operatively randomized to CAG + beta-RT or CAGalone. In the case of beta-RT, a (90) Sr eye applicator was used to deliver 10 Gy to the sclera surface at a dose rate of between 200 and 250 cGy/min. After treatment, both an ophthalmologist and a radiation oncologist performed the follow-up examinations. The accumulated data were analyzed using a group sequential test. Results: Between February 2008 and September 2008, 116 eyes with primary pterygium were operated on according to the trial protocol. Adjuvant treatment was performed within 24 h post-operatively. Eight patients were lost to follow-up, resulting in 108 patients who could be analyzed. At a mean follow-up of 18 months (range, 8-33), in the 54 eyes randomized to receive CAG + beta-RT, 5 relapses occurred compared with 12 recurrences in the 54 eyes in CAG, for a crude control rate of 90.8 % vs. 78%; p = 0.032, respectively. The treatment complications as hyperemia, total dehiscence of the autograft and dellen were significantly more frequent in the CAG (p < 0.05). The arm of beta-RT resulted in better cosmetic results and improves of symptoms than CAG. Conclusions: A low single-dose of beta-RT of 10 Gy after CAG surgery was a simple, effective, and safe treatment that reduced the risk of primary pterygium recurrence, improved symptoms after surgery, resulting in a better cosmetic effect than only CAG. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc.

Community-acquired urinary tract infection: age and gender-dependent etiology

LO, Denise Swei et al. Community-acquired urinary tract infection: age and gender-dependent etiology. J. Bras. Nefrol. [online]. 2013, vol.35, n.2, pp. 93-98. ISSN 0101-2800. http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0101-2800.20130016. INTRODUCTION: Choosing the antimicrobial agent for initial therapy of urinary tract infection (UTI) is usually empirical and should consider the prevalence of uropathogens in different age groups and gender. OBJECTIVE: To establish prevalence rates of uropathogens in community-acquired UTI in relation to age and gender. METHODS: Crosssectional study conducted in the emergency department (ED) of a general hospital, from January to December, 2010, in patients younger than 15 years old who had clinical suspicion of UTI and collected quantitative urine culture. UTI was defined as urine culture with growth of a single agent > 100.000 colony forming units (cfu)/mL in a midstream collection or > 50.000 cfu/mL in urethral catheterization. RESULTS: There were 63.464 visits to ED. 2577 urine cultures were obtained, of whom 291 were positive for UTI (prevalence = 11.3% of clinical suspicion and 0.46% of visits), 212 cases (72.8%) in females, median age = 2.6 years. The predominant uropathogen was E. coli (76.6%), followed by Proteus mirabilis (10.3%) and Staphylococcus saprophyticus (4.1%). Among infants < 3 months, prevalence rates of E. coli were significantly lower (50% vs 78.4%; OR = 0.276; p = 0.006). Higher prevalences of Staphylococcus saprophyticus occurred among patients > 10 years (24.4% vs 0.4%; OR = 79.265; p < 0.0001). Proteus mirabilis was significantly more prevalent in boys than girls (24.0% vs 5.2%; OR = 5.786; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: E. coli was the most prevalent community-acquired uropathogen. Nevertheless, initial empiric antimicrobial treatment of UTI should consider the significant prevalence of other agents different from E. coli in infants < 3 months, the high prevalence of Staphylococcus saprophyticus in patients > 10 years and Proteus mirabilis in males.

Tratamento percutâneo vs. cirúrgico da persistência do canal arterial em crianças e adolescentes

INTRODUÇÃO: Estudos comparando os métodos percutâneo e cirúrgico no tratamento da persistência do canal arterial (PCA) são raros na literatura. Nosso objetivo foi realizar análise comparativa entre os dois métodos de tratamento da PCA, enfatizando os aspectos de eficácia e morbidade. MÉTODOS: Estudo observacional com 2 coortes de crianças e adolescentes > 5 kg e < 14 anos, portadores de PCA, tratados durante um projeto de avaliação de incorporação de novas tecnologias ao Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), realizado em um hospital cardiológico de excelência, em parceria com o Ministério da Saúde do Brasil. Foi feita análise prospectiva no grupo percutâneo entre 2009 e 2011 e retrospectiva no grupo cirúrgico entre 2006 e 2011. RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos 80 pacientes no grupo percutâneo (60% do sexo feminino) e 39 no grupo cirúrgico (51% do sexo feminino; P = 0,37). A mediana de idade e de peso dos grupos percutâneo e cirúrgico foi de 39,4 meses vs. 25,5 meses (P = 0,04) e de 14 kg vs. 11,1 kg (P = 0,052), respectivamente. No grupo percutâneo, 78 pacientes (92%) tinham PCA do tipo A e o diâmetro mínimo do canal à angiografia foi de 2,5 ± 1,2 mm. As próteses mais utilizadas foram Amplatzer®, molas de Gianturco e CeraTM. A técnica cirúrgica mais utilizada foi a clipagem. A taxa de sucesso dos procedimentos foi de 100% nos dois grupos. O grupo cirúrgico apresentou maiores taxas de complicação, incluindo quilotórax, infecções, necessidade de hemoderivados, hipertensão arterial sistêmica e uso de opioides, como também maior necessidade de terapia intensiva. A mediana do tempo de internação foi de 1,3 dia no grupo percutâneo e de 7,9 dias no grupo cirúrgico (P < 0,01). À alta hospitalar, as taxas de oclusão foram semelhantes nos dois grupos (91% no grupo percutâneo e 87% no grupo cirúrgico; P = 0,71). CONCLUSÕES: Em decorrência da menor morbidade, do menor tempo de internação e da igual eficácia, o tratamento percutâneo da PCA deve ser considerado a modalidade terapêutica de escolha para pacientes selecionados.