Acellular dermal matrix graft with or without enamel matrix derivative for root coverage in smokers: a randomized clinical study

Aim: The aim of this randomized controlled clinical study was to compare the use of an acellular dermal matrix graft (ADMG) with or without the enamel matrix derivative (EMD) in smokers to evaluate which procedure would provide better root coverage. Material and Methods: Nineteen smokers with bilateral Miller Class I or II gingival recessions >= 3 mm were selected. The test group was treated with an association of ADMG and EMD, and the control group with ADMG alone. Probing depth, relative clinical attachment level, gingival recession height, gingival recession width, keratinized tissue width and keratinized tissue thickness were evaluated before the surgeries and after 6 months. Wilcoxon test was used for the statistical analysis at significance level of 5%. Results: No significant differences were found between groups in all parameters at baseline. The mean gain recession height between baseline and 6 months and the complete root coverage favored the test group (p = 0.042, p = 0.019 respectively). Conclusion: Smoking may negatively affect the results achieved through periodontal plastic procedures; however, the association of ADMG and EMD is beneficial in the root coverage of gingival recessions in smokers, 6 months after the surgery.

A Randomized comparative clinical study of two surgical procedures to improve root coverage with the acellular dermal matrix graft

Aim This randomized, controlled, clinical study compared two surgical techniques for root coverage with the acellular dermal matrix graft (ADMG) to evaluate which procedure could provide better root coverage and greater amounts of keratinized tissue. Materials and Methods Fifteen pairs of bilateral Miller Class I or II gingival recessions were treated and assigned randomly to the test group, and the contra-lateral recessions were assigned to the control group. The ADMG was used in both groups. In the control group, the graft and flap were positioned at the level of the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ), and in the test group, the graft was positioned 1 mm apical to the CEJ and the flap 1 mm coronal to the CEJ. The clinical parameters were taken before the surgeries and after 6 months. The gingival recession area, a new parameter, was measured in standardized photographs through a special device and software. Results There were statistically significant differences favouring the proposed technique for all parameters except for the amount of keratinized tissue at 6 months. Conclusions The proposed test technique is more suitable for root coverage procedures with ADMG, and the new parameter evaluated appears valuable for root coverage analysis. (Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01175720).

Comparison Between Micro- and Macrosurgical Techniques for the Treatment of Localized Gingival Recessions Using Coronally Positioned Flaps and Enamel Matrix Derivative

Background: The aim of this study is to compare the macro- and microsurgery techniques for root coverage using a coronally positioned flap (CPF) associated with enamel matrix derivative (EMD). Methods: Thirty patients were selected for the treatment of localized gingival recessions (GRs) using CPF associated to EMD. Fifteen patients were randomly assigned to the test group (TG), and 15 patients were randomly assigned to the control group (CG). The microsurgical approach was performed in the TG, and the conventional macrosurgical technique was performed in the CG. The clinical parameters evaluated before surgery and after 6 months were GR, probing depth, relative clinical attachment level, width of keratinized tissue (WKT), and thickness of keratinized tissue (TKT). The discomfort evaluation was performed 1 week postoperative. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between groups for all parameters at baseline. At 6 months, there was no statistically significant difference between the techniques in achieving root coverage. The percentage of root coverage was 92% and 83% for TG and CG, respectively. After 6 months, there was a statistically significant increase of WKT and TKT in TG only. Both procedures were well tolerated by all patients. Conclusions: The macro- and microsurgery techniques provided a statistically significant reduction in GR height. After 6 months, there was no statistically significant difference between the techniques regarding root coverage, and the microsurgical technique demonstrated a statistically significant increase in WKT and TKT. J Periodontol 2010;81:1572-1579.

Uso de matriz dérmica associado ao curativo por pressão negativa na abordagem da contratura em pacientes queimados

INTRODUÇÃO: O aperfeiçoamento no tratamento inicial do paciente queimado, por meio da reposição volêmica e, principalmente, com excisão e enxertia precoce das lesões, resultou em profundo impacto na evolução dos indivíduos queimados, ocorrendo aumento da taxa de sobrevida. Com a maior sobrevida desses pacientes surgiu um novo desafio para a cirurgia reparadora, o tratamento das sequelas de queimaduras, principalmente compostas pelas contraturas. O objetivo deste estudo é demonstrar o uso da matriz dérmica artificial associado a terapia por pressão negativa no tratamento de sequelas de queimaduras. MÉTODO: Foram selecionados 10 pacientes com contratura por queimadura. Os pacientes selecionados foram submetidos a liberação da contratura cicatricial e colocação de matriz dérmica artificial (Integra®), conforme técnica padrão, e curativo por pressão negativa para cobertura. A cada 5 dias, foram realizadas trocas do curativo até completar período de 3 semanas a 4 semanas. Após esse período, o leito foi submetido a enxertia de pele. Os pacientes foram questionados, no pré e pós-operatório, quanto a sua satisfação com os aspectos estético e funcional da região abordada. RESULTADOS: Houve integração de cerca de 98% da matriz de regeneração dérmica na área em que a contratura foi ressecada. Também ocorreu integração de aproximadamente 85% dos enxertos utilizados. Todos os pacientes abordados referiram significativa melhora estética e, principalmente, funcional da região abordada. CONCLUSÕES: O uso da matriz de regeneração dérmica associado a terapia por pressão negativa promove maior taxa de sucesso na abordagem da contratura cicatricial, proporcionando melhor resultado tanto funcional como estético nos pacientes com sequelas graves de queimadura.