Comparison Between Micro- and Macrosurgical Techniques for the Treatment of Localized Gingival Recessions Using Coronally Positioned Flaps and Enamel Matrix Derivative


Autoria(s): ANDRADE, Patricia F.; GRISI, Marcio F. M.; MARCACCINI, Andrea M.; FERNANDES, Patricia G.; REINO, Danilo M.; SOUZA, Sergio L. S.; TABA JR., Mario; PALIOTO, Daniela B.; NOVAES JR., Arthur B.
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

20/10/2012

20/10/2012

2010

Resumo

Background: The aim of this study is to compare the macro- and microsurgery techniques for root coverage using a coronally positioned flap (CPF) associated with enamel matrix derivative (EMD). Methods: Thirty patients were selected for the treatment of localized gingival recessions (GRs) using CPF associated to EMD. Fifteen patients were randomly assigned to the test group (TG), and 15 patients were randomly assigned to the control group (CG). The microsurgical approach was performed in the TG, and the conventional macrosurgical technique was performed in the CG. The clinical parameters evaluated before surgery and after 6 months were GR, probing depth, relative clinical attachment level, width of keratinized tissue (WKT), and thickness of keratinized tissue (TKT). The discomfort evaluation was performed 1 week postoperative. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between groups for all parameters at baseline. At 6 months, there was no statistically significant difference between the techniques in achieving root coverage. The percentage of root coverage was 92% and 83% for TG and CG, respectively. After 6 months, there was a statistically significant increase of WKT and TKT in TG only. Both procedures were well tolerated by all patients. Conclusions: The macro- and microsurgery techniques provided a statistically significant reduction in GR height. After 6 months, there was no statistically significant difference between the techniques regarding root coverage, and the microsurgical technique demonstrated a statistically significant increase in WKT and TKT. J Periodontol 2010;81:1572-1579.

FAPESP State of Sao Paulo Research Foundation, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil[2007/ 02461-4]

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)

CNPq National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development, Brasilia, DF, Brazil

Identificador

JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, v.81, n.11, p.1572-1579, 2010

0022-3492

http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/32156

10.1902/jop.2010.100155

http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100155

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

AMER ACAD PERIODONTOLOGY

Relação

Journal of Periodontology

Direitos

restrictedAccess

Copyright AMER ACAD PERIODONTOLOGY

Palavras-Chave #Clinical trial #enamel matrix proteins #gingival recession #microsurgery #ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX #CONNECTIVE-TISSUE GRAFT #ROOT COVERAGE PROCEDURES #PERIODONTAL REGENERATION #REPOSITIONED FLAP #PEDICLE GRAFT #DEFECTS #PROTEINS #MULTICENTER #COMBINATION #Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion