Assessing the role of small farms in sustainable Food and Nutrition Security: What to consider t what scale?,

The AgroMed International Conference 2016 aims to discuss the current land use changes, with a particular interest on farm and land system dynamics, also considering the possible competition with other uses (urban and/or natural land uses). It is focused on “Farm and land system dynamics in the Mediterranean basin: integrating spatial scales, from the local to the global one”. Teresa Pinto Correia presented H2020 project SALSA “Small farms, small food businesses and sustainable food security”

Isolation of Aeromonas hydrophila in piglets

The production of Alentejano breed pig started a recovery two decades ago due to increasing demand for gourmet products. These pigs are raised in rotational semi-extensive or extensive outdoor production systems in the “Montado” (green and cork oak forest), grazing and feeding acorns and other associated food resources. Bacteria of the genus Aeromonas are considered as emerging pathogens of importance for man and animals, but its involvement in swine is not well documented. In the context of a study made at the University of Évora to assess the specific diseases of Alentejano swine, diseased piglets from two farms were submitted for pathological and bacteriological examinations. Pathological examinations revealed changes characteristic of septicemia, and Aeromonas hydrophila was isolated in pure culture from multiple organs of piglets from both farms. Antibiotic sensitivity tests showed that the isolates from one of the farms were susceptible to gentamicin, oxitetracycline, neomycin, enrofloxacin, colistin sulfate, trimethoprim, ceftiofur, and amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid. In contrast, the A. hydrophila isolated in the other farm was resistant to all drugs tested but enrofloxacin. This is the first report in the world showing the relationship between septicemia and A. hydrophila infection in piglets. The importance of this finding is further reinforced by the fact that these bacteria can be highly resistant to antimicrobial agents.

Pesquisa de Campylobacter fetus em amostras prepuciais de touros da região do Alentejo

A bactéria Campylobacter fetus divide-se em duas subespécies C. fetus fetus (Cff) e C. fetus venerealis (Cfv). Cfv é o agente patogénico responsável pela campilobacteriose genital bovina (CGB), uma doença que provoca infertilidade em vacas. Cff pode provocar abortos esporádicos, mas não provoca CGB. Neste trabalho procedeu-se à pesquisa de C. fetus por imunofluorescência direta (IFD) em 117 amostras prepuciais, recolhidas por raspagem, de touros pertencentes a 25 explorações na região do Alentejo. A prevalência real de CGB na amostra, considerando a sensibilidade e especificidade do teste, foi de 52,89% de animais e 80% de explorações. Foi também realizada uma comparação entre dois testes de diagnóstico de CGB, a IFD e o isolamento bacteriológico. O isolamento bacteriológico foi difícil de executar e a presença de bactérias contaminantes foi bastante problemática, levando a resultados falso-negativos. A sua correlação com a IFD foi muito baixa, tendo esta revelado ser muito mais sensível; #### Abstract Search for Campylobacter fetus in preputial samples of bulls from Alentejo region The bacteria Campylobacter fetus comprises two subspecies, C. fetus fetus (Cff) and C. fetus venerealis (Cfv). Cfv is the pathogen responsible for bovine genital campylobacteriosis (BGC), a disease that causes infertility in cows. Cff may lead to sporadic miscarriages, but does not cause BGC. In this work we searched for C. fetus by direct immunofluorescence (DIF) in 117 preputial samples, collected by scraping, from bulls from Alentejo region. The actual prevalence of BGC, considering the sensitivity and specificity of the test was 52.89% of animals and 80 % of farms. It was also performed a comparison between two BGC diagnostic tests, bacterial isolation and DIF. The bacterial isolation was difficult to perform and the presence of bacterial contaminants was very problematic, leading to false-negative results. The presence of bacterial contaminants in bacterial isolation was problematic, leading to false-negative results. Its correlation with DIF was quite low, and DIF proved to be much more sensitive.