1 resultado para Right to Propose
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (4)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (13)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Archive of European Integration (18)
- Aston University Research Archive (15)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (58)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (5)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (21)
- Brock University, Canada (12)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (20)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (23)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (5)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (9)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (81)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (5)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Peer Publishing (4)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (8)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (15)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Harvard University (3)
- Hospital Prof. Dr. Fernando Fonseca - Portugal (1)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (7)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (39)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (23)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (6)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (4)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (11)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (4)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (3)
- RepoCLACAI - Consorcio Latinoamericano Contra el Aborto Inseguro (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (3)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (29)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (25)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (7)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (8)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (4)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT) (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (24)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad EAFIT - Medelin - Colombia (1)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (2)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (50)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (36)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (10)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (14)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (2)
- Universidade do Minho (40)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (3)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (2)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (120)
- Université de Montréal (4)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (34)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (2)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (26)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (20)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
Resumo:
The aim of the present study was to propose and evaluate the use of factor analysis (FA) in obtaining latent variables (factors) that represent a set of pig traits simultaneously, for use in genome-wide selection (GWS) studies. We used crosses between outbred F2 populations of Brazilian Piau X commercial pigs. Data were obtained on 345 F2 pigs, genotyped for 237 SNPs, with 41 traits. FA allowed us to obtain four biologically interpretable factors: ?weight?, ?fat?, ?loin?, and ?performance?. These factors were used as dependent variables in multiple regression models of genomic selection (Bayes A, Bayes B, RR-BLUP, and Bayesian LASSO). The use of FA is presented as an interesting alternative to select individuals for multiple variables simultaneously in GWS studies; accuracy measurements of the factors were similar to those obtained when the original traits were considered individually. The similarities between the top 10% of individuals selected by the factor, and those selected by the individual traits, were also satisfactory. Moreover, the estimated markers effects for the traits were similar to those found for the relevant factor.