Större frihet - bättre lokalt anpassad service? : Förvaltningsreformer och kommunernas service för utvecklingsstörda 1994-2000

In the beginning of the 1990s the legislation regarding the municipalities and the system of central government transfers were reformed in Finland. This resulted in a move from detailed governmental control to increased municipal autonomy. The purpose of this decentralization was to enable the municipalities to better adapt their administration and service supply to local needs. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of the increased municipal autonomy on the organization of services for people with intellectual disabilities. Did the increased autonomy cause the municipalities to alter their service supply and production and did the services become more adapted to local needs? The data consists of statistical information on service use and production, and also of background data such as demographics, economics and political elections on 452 municipalities in Finland from the years 1994 and 2000. The methods used are cluster analysis, discriminant analysis and factor analysis. The municipalities could be grouped in two categories: those which offered mainly one kind of residential services and others which had more varied mixes of services. The use of institutional care had decreased and municipalities which used institutional care as their primary form of service were mostly very small municipalities in 2000. The situation had changed from 1994, when institutional care was the primary service for municipalities of all sizes. Also the service production had become more differentiated and the municipalities had started using more varied ways of production. More municipalities had started producing their own services and private production had increased as well. Furthermore, the increase in local autonomy had opened up possibilities for local politics to influence both the service selection and methods of production. The most significant motive for changes in the service structure was high unemployment and an increasing share of elderly people in the population, particularly in sparsely populated areas. Municipalities with a low level of resources had made more changes in their service organization while those with more resources had been able to carry on as before. Key words: service structure, service for people with intellectual disabilities, municipalities, contingency theory, New Public Management

Ministers as strategic political leaders? : Strategic political steering after NPM reforms in Finland

This study explores strategic political steering after the New Public Management (NPM) reforms, with emphasis on the new role assigned to Government ministers in Finland. In the NPM model, politicians concentrate on broad, principal issues, while agencies have discretion within the limits set by politicians. In Finland, strategic steering was introduced with Management by Results (MBR), but the actual tools for strategic political steering have been the Government Programme, the Government Strategy Portfolio (GSP) and Frame Budgeting. This study addresses these tools as means of strategic steering conducted by the Cabinet and individual ministers within their respective ministries. The time frame of the study includes the two Lipponen Cabinets between 1995 and 2003. Interviews with fourteen ministers as well as with fourteen top officials were conducted. In addition, administrative reform documents and documents related to strategic steering tools were analysed. The empirical conclusions of the study can be summarised as follows: There were few signs of strategic political steering in the Lipponen Cabinets. Although the Government Programmes of both Cabinets introduced strategic thinking, the strategic guidelines set forth at the beginning of the Programme were not linked to the GSP or to Frame Budgeting. The GSP could be characterised as the collected strategic agendas of each ministry, while there was neither the will nor the courage among Cabinet members to prioritise the projects and to make selections. The Cabinet used Frame Budgeting mainly in the sense of spending limits, not in making strategic allocation decisions. As for the GSP at the departmental level, projects were suggested by top officials, and ministers only approved the suggested list. Frame Budgeting at the departmental level proved to be the most interesting strategic steering tool from ministers viewpoint: they actively participated in defining which issues would need extra financing. Because the chances for extra financing were minimal, ministers had an effect only on a marginal share of the budget. At the departmental level, the study shows that strategic plans were considered the domain of officials. As for strategies concerning specific substances, there was variation in the interest shown by the ministers. A few ministers emphasised the importance of strategic work and led strategy processes. In most cases, however, officials led the process while ministers offered comments on the drafts of strategy documents. The results of this study together with experiences reported in other countries and local politics show that political decision-makers have difficulty operating at the strategic level. The conclusion is that politicians do not have sufficient incentive to perform the strategic role implied by the NPM type of reforms. Overall, the empirical results of the study indicate the power of politics over management reforms.

Vaikuttavuusyhteiskunta : Sosiaalisten olojen arvostelusta vaikutusten todentamiseen

Evaluation practices have pervaded the Finnish society and welfare state. At the same time the term effectiveness has become a powerful organising concept in welfare state activities. The aim of the study is to analyse how the outcome-oriented society came into being through historical processes, to answer the question of how social policy and welfare state practices were brought under the governance of the concept of effectiveness . Discussions about social imagination, Michel Foucault s conceptions of the history of the present and of governmentality, genealogy and archaeology, along with Ian Hacking s notions of dynamic nominalism and styles of reasoning, are used as the conceptual and methodological starting points for the study. In addition, Luc Boltanski s and Laurent Thévenot s ideas of orders of worth , regimes of evaluation in everyday life, are employed. Usually, evaluation is conceptualised as an autonomous epistemic culture and practice (evaluation as epistemic practice), but evaluation is here understood as knowledge-creation processes elementary to different epistemic practices (evaluation in epistemic practices). The emergence of epistemic cultures and styles of reasoning about the effectiveness or impacts of welfare state activities are analysed through Finnish social policy and social work research. The study uses case studies which represent debates and empirical research dealing with the effectiveness and quality of social services and social work. While uncertainty and doubts over the effects and consequences of welfare policies have always been present in discourses about social policy, the theme has not been acknowledged much in social policy research. To resolve these uncertainties, eight styles of reasoning about such effects have emerged over time. These are the statistical, goal-based, needs-based, experimental, interaction-based, performance measurement, auditing and evidence-based styles of reasoning. Social policy research has contributed in various ways to the creation of these epistemic practices. The transformation of the welfare state, starting at the end of 1980s, increased market-orientation and trimmed public welfare responsibilities, and led to the adoption of the New Public Management (NPM) style of leadership. Due to these developments the concept of effectiveness made a breakthrough, and new accountabilities with their knowledge tools for performance measurement and auditing and evidence-based styles of reasoning became more dominant in the ruling of the welfare state. Social sciences and evaluation have developed a heteronomous relation with each other, although there still remain divergent tendencies between them. Key words: evaluation, effectiveness, social policy, welfare state, public services, sociology of knowledge

Kuntien vaikuttavuustavoitteet lasten ja nuorten hyvinvointityössä

Tämä pro gradu –tutkielma tarkastelee kuntien itselleen asettamia vaikuttavuustavoitteita lasten ja nuorten hyvinvointityössä. Kirjallisuuskatsauksessa selvitetään, mitä tulos- ja tavoiteohjaus, tuloksellisuus ja vaikuttavuus tarkoittavat kuntien lasten ja nuorten hyvinvointityössä. Julkishallinnon New Public Management-reformin pohjalta syntynyt kuntalaki painottaa organisaatioiden tehokkuutta ja tuloksellisuutta. Tuloksellisuudella tarkoitetaan toimintojen taloudellisuutta ja vaikuttavuutta. Tällaiseen tulos- ja tavoiteohjaukseen siirtyminen on edellyttänyt arvioinnin kehittämistä. Keskeisiä käsitteitä tässä tutkimuksessa ovat: toiminta-ajatus, päämäärä, tavoite, vaikuttavuus, vaikuttavuustavoite, vaikutus ja arviointi. Teoreettista kirjallisuutta konkretisoidaan lasten ja nuorten hyvinvointityön arkipäivään liittyvin sovelluksin ja esimerkein. Tutkielman aineistona on 12 kuntien tuottamaa, vuoden 2008 alussa lakisääteiseksi tullutta lasten ja nuorten hyvinvointisuunnitelmaa, joiden tehtävänä on toimia lasten ja nuorten hyvinvoinnin edistämiseksi sekä lastensuojelun järjestämiseksi ja kehittämiseksi kunnissa. Aineiston kvalitatiivisen eli laadullisen analyysin menetelmänä käytetään teemoittelua. Tarkastelu paljastaa, että kunnat ovat asettaneet varsin vähän konkreettisia ja mitattavissa olevia vaikuttavuustavoitteita laatiessaan lasten ja nuorten hyvinvointisuunnitelmia. Kuntien asettamat tavoitteet voidaan jakaa seuraaviin teemoihin: määrälliset ja ”joko tai” –tavoitteet, ehdotusmuotoiset tavoitteet, ”kehitetään, edistetään, panostetaan, vahvistetaan” –tavoitteet, tavoitteet jatkuvana resurssitaisteluna sekä ”oikein vai väärin” –tyyppiset tavoitteet. Edellä esitetyt tavoitetyypit voidaan jakaa vielä karkeasti kahdenlaisiin kategorioihin: kunnallisen lasten ja nuorten palvelujärjestelmän kehittämiseen keskittyvät tavoitteet ja oikeaa ja väärää kuvaavat, moraalis-eettiset tavoitteet. Koko aineiston kattavana havaintona esitetään, että kunnat tuntuvat välttelevän täsmällisten, konkreettisten ja mitattavissa olevien tavoitteiden esittämistä lasten ja nuorten hyvinvointisuunnitelmissa ja ilmaisevan tavoitteiden sijaan mielellään palvelujärjestelmää kuvaavia ja kehittäviä päämääriä.

The Gendered Social Organisation of Defence: Two Ethnographic Case Studies in the Finnish Defence Forces

In Finland the organising of defence is undergoing vast restructuring. Recent legislation has redefined the central tasks of the Finnish Defence Forces. At the same time, international security cooperation, economic pressures and new administrative paradigms have steered the military towards new ways of organising. National defence is not just politics and principles; to a large extent it is also enacted in day-to-day life in organisations. The lens through which these realities of defence are analysed in this study is gender. How is the security sector – and national defence as part of it – organised in the changing security environment? What is the new division of labour between different societal actors in the face of security challenges? What happens ‘at work’ within the military and the defence sector more broadly? How does gender affect the way in which defence is organised and understood, and how do the changes in the organising of security affect gender relations? The thesis searches for answers to these questions in the context of two organisational settings in the male-dominated defence sector. The case study on a Finnish peacekeeping unit in the Balkans opens a critical view on men’s social practices and the everyday life of crisis management organisations. In the second case study, reorganising of provisioning in the Finnish Defence Forces turns out to be a complicated process where different power relations and social divisions intermingle. Tallberg’s extensive ethnographic fieldwork in the two focal organisations has produced a detailed set of data that lays the basis for critical analysis and policy development in terms of defence organising, cooperation around peace and security issues, and gender equality in organisations. Observations and results are provided for understanding social networks, militarisation, authority relations, care, public-private partnerships, personnel policies, career planning, and humour.

Kuntien vaikuttavuustavoitteet lasten ja nuorten hyvinvointityössä

Tämä pro gradu –tutkielma tarkastelee kuntien itselleen asettamia vaikuttavuustavoitteita lasten ja nuorten hyvinvointityössä. Kirjallisuuskatsauksessa selvitetään, mitä tulos- ja tavoiteohjaus, tuloksellisuus ja vaikuttavuus tarkoittavat kuntien lasten ja nuorten hyvinvointityössä. Julkishallinnon New Public Management-reformin pohjalta syntynyt kuntalaki painottaa organisaatioiden tehokkuutta ja tuloksellisuutta. Tuloksellisuudella tarkoitetaan toimintojen taloudellisuutta ja vaikuttavuutta. Tällaiseen tulos- ja tavoiteohjaukseen siirtyminen on edellyttänyt arvioinnin kehittämistä. Keskeisiä käsitteitä tässä tutkimuksessa ovat: toiminta-ajatus, päämäärä, tavoite, vaikuttavuus, vaikuttavuustavoite, vaikutus ja arviointi. Teoreettista kirjallisuutta konkretisoidaan lasten ja nuorten hyvinvointityön arkipäivään liittyvin sovelluksin ja esimerkein. Tutkielman aineistona on 12 kuntien tuottamaa, vuoden 2008 alussa lakisääteiseksi tullutta lasten ja nuorten hyvinvointisuunnitelmaa, joiden tehtävänä on toimia lasten ja nuorten hyvinvoinnin edistämiseksi sekä lastensuojelun järjestämiseksi ja kehittämiseksi kunnissa. Aineiston kvalitatiivisen eli laadullisen analyysin menetelmänä käytetään teemoittelua. Tarkastelu paljastaa, että kunnat ovat asettaneet varsin vähän konkreettisia ja mitattavissa olevia vaikuttavuustavoitteita laatiessaan lasten ja nuorten hyvinvointisuunnitelmia. Kuntien asettamat tavoitteet voidaan jakaa seuraaviin teemoihin: määrälliset ja ”joko tai” –tavoitteet, ehdotusmuotoiset tavoitteet, ”kehitetään, edistetään, panostetaan, vahvistetaan” –tavoitteet, tavoitteet jatkuvana resurssitaisteluna sekä ”oikein vai väärin” –tyyppiset tavoitteet. Edellä esitetyt tavoitetyypit voidaan jakaa vielä karkeasti kahdenlaisiin kategorioihin: kunnallisen lasten ja nuorten palvelujärjestelmän kehittämiseen keskittyvät tavoitteet ja oikeaa ja väärää kuvaavat, moraalis-eettiset tavoitteet. Koko aineiston kattavana havaintona esitetään, että kunnat tuntuvat välttelevän täsmällisten, konkreettisten ja mitattavissa olevien tavoitteiden esittämistä lasten ja nuorten hyvinvointisuunnitelmissa ja ilmaisevan tavoitteiden sijaan mielellään palvelujärjestelmää kuvaavia ja kehittäviä päämääriä.