Structure-Function Studies of GDNF Family Ligand-RET signalling

Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) and its family members neurturin (NRTN), artemin (ARTN) and persephin (PSPN) are growth factors, which are involved in the development, differentiation and maintenance of many neuron types. In addition, they function outside of the nervous system, e.g. in the development of kidney, testis and liver. GDNF family ligand (GFL) signalling happens through a tetrameric receptor complex, which includes two glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored GDNF family receptor (GFRα) molecules and two RET (rearranged during transfection) receptor tyrosine kinases. Each of the ligands binds preferentially one of the four GFRα receptors: GDNF binds to GFRα1, NRTN to GFRα2, ARTN to GFRα3 and PSPN to GFRα4. The signal is then delivered by RET, which cannot bind the GFLs on its own, but can bind the GFL-GFRα complex. Under normal cellular conditions, RET is only phosphorylated on the cell surface after ligand binding. At least the GDNF-GFRα1 complex is believed to recruit RET to lipid rafts, where downstream signalling occurs. In general, GFRαs consist of three cysteine-rich domains, but all GFRα4s except for chicken GFRα4 lack domain 1 (D1). We characterised the biochemical and cell biological properties of mouse PSPN receptor GFRα4 and showed that it has a significantly weaker capacity than GFRα1 to recruit RET to the lipid rafts. In spite of that, it can phosphorylate RET in the presence of PSPN and contribute to neuronal differentiation and survival. Therefore, the recruitment of RET to the lipid rafts does not seem to be crucial for the biological activity of all GFRα receptors. Secondly, we demonstrated that GFRα1 D1 stabilises the GDNF-GFRα1 complex and thus affects the phosphorylation of RET and contributes to the biological activity. This may be important in physiological conditions, where the concentration of the ligand or the soluble GFRα1 receptor is low. Our results also suggest a role for D1 in heparin binding and, consequently, in the biodistribution of released GFRα1 or in the formation of the GFL-GFRα-RET complex. We also presented the crystallographic structure of GDNF in the complex with GFRα1 domains 2 and 3. The structure differs from the previously published ARTN-GFRα3 structure in three significant ways. The biochemical data verify the structure and reveal residues participating in the interactions between GFRα1 and GDNF, and preliminarily also between GFRα1 and RET and heparin. Finally, we showed that, the precursor of the oncogenic MEN 2B (multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2) form of RET gets phosphorylated already during its synthesis in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). We also demonstrated that it associates with Src homology 2 domain-containing protein (SHC) and growth factor receptor-bound protein (GRB2) in the ER, and has the capacity to activate several downstream signalling molecules.

Pannus invasion into cartilage and bone in rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis is the most common of all types of arthritis and despite of intensive research etiology of the disease remains unclear. Distinctive features of rheumatic arthritis comprise continuous inflammation of synovium, in which synovial membrane expands on cartilage leading to pannus tissue formation. Pannus formation, appearance of proteolytic enzymes and osteoclast formation cause articular cartilage and bone destruction, which lead to erosions and permanent joint damage. Proteolytic pathways play major roles in the development of tissue lesions in rheumatoid arthritis. Degradation of extracellular matrix proteins is essential to pannus formation and invasion. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) form a large proteolytic enzyme family and in rheumatoid arthritis they contribute to pannus invasion by degrading extracellular matrix and to joint destruction by directly degrading the cartilage. MMP-1 and MMP-3 are shown to be increased during cell invasion and also involved in cartilage destruction. Increase of many cytokines has been observed in rheumatoid arthritis, especially TNF-α and IL-1β are studied in synovial tissue and are involved in rheumatoid inflammation and degradation of cartilage. Underlying bone resorption requires first demineralization of bone matrix with acid secreted by osteoclasts, which exposes the collagen-rich matrix for degradation. Cathepsin K is the best known enzyme involved in bone matrix degradation, however deficiency of this protein in pycnodysostosis patient did not prevent bone erosion and on the contrary pannus tissue invading to bone did not expressed much cathepsin K. These indicate that other proteinases are involved in bone degradation, perhaps also via their capability to replace the role of other enzymes especially in diseases like pycnodysostosis or during medication e.g. using cathepsin K inhibitors. Multinuclear osteoclasts are formed also in pannus tissue, which enable the invasion into underlying bone matrix. Pannus tissue express a receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL), an essential factor for osteoclast differentiation and a disintegrin and a metalloproteinase 8 (ADAM8), an osteoclast-activating factors, involved in formation of osteoclast-like giant cells by promoting fusion of mononuclear precursor cells. The understanding of pannus invasion and degradation of extracellular matrix in rheumatic arthritis will open us new more specific methods to prevent this destructive joint disease.

Bootstrap and Fast Double Bootstrap Tests of Cointegration Rank with Financial Time Series

The likelihood ratio test of cointegration rank is the most widely used test for cointegration. Many studies have shown that its finite sample distribution is not well approximated by the limiting distribution. The article introduces and evaluates by Monte Carlo simulation experiments bootstrap and fast double bootstrap (FDB) algorithms for the likelihood ratio test. It finds that the performance of the bootstrap test is very good. The more sophisticated FDB produces a further improvement in cases where the performance of the asymptotic test is very unsatisfactory and the ordinary bootstrap does not work as well as it might. Furthermore, the Monte Carlo simulations provide a number of guidelines on when the bootstrap and FDB tests can be expected to work well. Finally, the tests are applied to US interest rates and international stock prices series. It is found that the asymptotic test tends to overestimate the cointegration rank, while the bootstrap and FDB tests choose the correct cointegration rank.

The Power of Bootstrap Tests of Cointegration Rank with Financial Time Series

Bootstrap likelihood ratio tests of cointegration rank are commonly used because they tend to have rejection probabilities that are closer to the nominal level than the rejection probabilities of the correspond- ing asymptotic tests. The e¤ect of bootstrapping the test on its power is largely unknown. We show that a new computationally inexpensive procedure can be applied to the estimation of the power function of the bootstrap test of cointegration rank. The bootstrap test is found to have a power function close to that of the level-adjusted asymp- totic test. The bootstrap test estimates the level-adjusted power of the asymptotic test highly accurately. The bootstrap test may have low power to reject the null hypothesis of cointegration rank zero, or underestimate the cointegration rank. An empirical application to Euribor interest rates is provided as an illustration of the findings.

Tests for Cointegration Rank and the Initial Condition

Many economic events involve initial observations that substantially deviate from long-run steady state. Initial conditions of this type have been found to impact diversely on the power of univariate unit root tests, whereas the impact on multivariate tests is largely unknown. This paper investigates the impact of the initial condition on tests for cointegration rank. We compare the local power of the widely used likelihood ratio (LR) test with the local power of a test based on the eigenvalues of the companion matrix. We find that the power of the LR test is increasing in the magnitude of the initial condition, whereas the power of the other test is decreasing. The behaviour of the tests is investigated in an application to price convergence.