Tyhjä taivas : Georges Bataille ja uskonnon kysymys

Empty Heavens. Georges Bataille and the Question of Religion. The dissertation explores the question of religion in the texts of Georges Bataille (1897 1962), the controversial French avant-garde writer and philosopher. Passionate about religion throughout his life, Bataille devoted to it both critical analyses and personal meditations. In this study, Bataille s multifaceted relationship to religion is interpreted as expressing a passion for radical otherness. Bataille is approached as a characteristically modern thinker who, nevertheless, questions some landmarks of modernity insofar as modernity is interpreted as a triumph of secularization. The dissertation is situated at the intersection of comparative religion and philosophy of religion. Methodologically, the study resorts to theoretical contextualization and concept analysis. Acknowledging that Bataille s writings challenge the assumptions about coherent meaning taken for granted in traditional philosophical analysis, the study also pays attention to the literary means and, in general, the performative level of Bataille s texts. The study constructs three theoretical contexts for Bataille s question of religion first of all, the interpretation of Hegel in the mid-20th century French philosophy. In the first section of the study, Bataille s uneasy relationship with Hegel as mediated by Alexandre Kojève is explored. The motivation of his question of radical otherness is argued to arise from his struggle with the Hegelian Kojèvean notion of negativity. The second context is the dialogue with the Christian mystical tradition. Starting from the analysis of two Bataillean notions, dramatization and contestation , it is argued that, firstly, Bataille s approach to radical otherness is analogous to certain procedures of mystical texts while, secondly, the function of otherness providing no firm foundation in Bataille s texts differs from its function in mystical texts. In the third section of the study, Bataille s quest for otherness is concretized by analyzing his views on otherness of other person, on violence, and on death themes that are brought together in Bataille s lasting interest in sacrifice. Bataille s understanding of sacrifice is proportioned to social scientific and philosophical discussions on sacrifice. It is argued that the commitment to the idea of sacrifice accounts for a partial failure in the Bataillean approach to otherness, the otherness of other person remaining its (at least half) blind spot. The study presents an overview of Bataille s thought on religion. It brings out Bataille s view of the paradoxical fundamental yet impossible role of otherness in the construction of human world, as well as his understanding of religious representations as both covering over and indicating this otherness. It describes Bataille s atheological mysticism as a peculiar modern form of religiosity, as an ambivalent mourning for and exaltation of fundamental loss.

Christian-Muslim Dialogue : Perspectives of Four Lebanese Thinkers

This study describes and analyses two Lebanese Muslims and two Lebanese Christians ideas about Christian-Muslim dialogue, its nature, aims, and methods and its different dimensions, which include doctrinal, ethical, and social dimensions. On the basis of the analysis, the four thinkers contributions for promoting constructive dialogue are evaluated. The persons studied are two religious authorities, the Shiite Great Ayatollah Muhammad Husayn Fadlallah (b. 1935) and the Eastern Orthodox Metropolitan of Mount Lebanon, Georges Khodr (b. 1923), and two academic scholars, Doctor Mahmoud Ayoub (b. 1935) and Doctor, Father Mouchir Aoun (b. 1964), from the Shiite and Greek Catholic communities, respectively. The method of the study is systematic analysis. The sources consist of the four thinkers writings on Christian-Muslim relations, the most of which have been published in Lebanon in the 1990s and 2000s in the Arabic language. In their general guidelines for Christian-Muslim dialogue, the four authors do not offer any novel or unusual insights. However, their dialogue visions are multi-faceted, motivating interreligious encounter both on religious and practical grounds and clarifying the theological grounds and socio-political conditions of this endeavour. The major challenge appears to be the tension between loyalty to one s own convictions and taking into account the particular self-understanding of the other. While this tension may be ultimately unsolvable, it is obvious that linking dialogue tightly to missionary motivations or certain theological agenda imposed on the others is not conducive for better mutual understanding. As for how diverse theologies of religions affect interreligious dialogue, narrow exclusivism hardly promotes mutual knowledge and appreciation, but also inclusive and pluralistic positions have their particular dilemmas. In the end, dialogue is possible from diverse positions on theology of religions. All the authors discuss the theological themes of divine revelation, concept of God, and human condition and ultimate destiny. The two religions particular views on these issues cannot be reconciled, but the authors offer diverse means to facilitate mutual understanding on them, such as increasing mutual knowledge, questioning certain traditional condemnations, showing theological parallels between the two religions, and transcending doctrinal disagreements by stressing common religious experience or ethical concerns. Among the theological themes, especially the concept of God seems to offer possibilities for better understanding than has traditionally been the case. Significantly, all the four authors maintain that Christians and Muslims share the faith in the one God, irrespective of their disagreements about the nature of his oneness. Basic ethical principles are not discussed as widely by the four authors as might be expected, which may reflect the shared cultural background and common ethical values of the Lebanese Muslims and Christians. On this level, Christians alienation from the Islamic law appears as the most significant challenge to mutual understanding, while neighbourly love and the golden rule of ethics offer a fruitful basis for further dialogue. As for the issue of political power-sharing in Lebanon, it is clear that the proposal of an Islamic state is problematic in a country with a sizable Christian minority and a heterogeneous Muslim population. Some form of democracy seems more viable for a multireligious country, but the question remains how to retain religion as a vital force in society, which is felt to be important by all the four Lebanese authors.

Lokia etsimässä : Viisi teoriaa muinaisskandinaavisen Lokin hahmosta

Loki on muinaisskandinaavisen mytologian monimutkaisimpia hahmoja. Keskiaikaiset lähteet Lokista ovat runo- ja Snorrin Edda sekä skaldirunot. Moderneja kansansanontoja on myös käytetty tutkimuksessa Lokin hahmosta, mutta osa tutkijoista vastustaa niiden käyttöä ajallisen ja usein maantieteellisen eroavaisuuden takia verrattuna keskiaikaiseen Lokiin. Analysoimalla Axel Olrikin, Hilding Celanderin, Jan de Vriesin, Georges Dumézilin sekä Anna Birgitta Roothin teorioita Lokista selvitän, minkälaiset teoreettiset lähtökohdat Lokin hahmon tutkimuksesta ovat vallinneet 1900-luvulla ja miten he ovat käyttäneet keskiaikaisia ja moderneja lähteitä. Lisäksi tarkastelen sitä, miten näiden tutkijoiden teoriat ovat vaikuttaneet uudempaan tutkimukseen Lokista. Metodinani käytän systemaattista analyysia. Olrik lähestyi Lokin hahmoa maantieteellis-historiallisen metodin kautta jaotellen myytit Lokista joko Odinn-Loki- tai Thorr-Loki-ryhmään. Hänen johtopäätöstensä perusteella Loki on lähtökohtaisesti Prometheus-tyypin hahmo, joka on ensin yhdistetty Thorriin ja myöhemmin Odinniin. Celanderin mukaan Loki on alun perin haltija, ja hän lähestyy aineistoaan Lokin nimestä tehtyjen etymologisten johtopäätösten kautta yhdistäen teoriaansa moderneja luonnonilmiöihin liittyviä sanontoja. de Vries käyttää metodinaan filologista menetelmää ja hän näkee Lokissa kulttuuriheeroksen ja tricksterin. Dumézilin näkemyksen pohjana on hänen teoriansa kolmiosaisesta indoeurooppalaisesta yhteisöstä. Dumézil vertaa Lokia kaukasuslaiseen Syrdon-hahmoon löytäen näiden väliltä useita yhtäläisyyksiä. Rooth pyrkii löytämään mahdollisimman alkuperäisen Lokin hahmon karsimalla myyteistä muualta tulleet vaikutteet. Hänen mukaansa Loki on ollut alun perin hämähäkin hahmoinen trickster, josta olisi jäänyt merkkejä kansanperinteeseen. Johtopäätöksenäni totean, että Lokin tutkimukseen ovat vaikuttaneet ainakin diffusionistinen metodi, filologinen ja strukturalistinen lähestymistapa sekä varhaisemmat 1800-luvun teoriat kuten Frazerin ja Müllerin uskontoteoriat. Keskiaikaisista lähteistä Snorrin Eddan luotettavuudesta on syntynyt eniten keskustelua, etenkin Baldr-myytin tulkinnan kannalta. Sen sijaan skaldirunojen ja runo-Eddan luotettavuutta ei ole kyseenalaistettu yhtä useasti. Modernien lähteiden luotettavuudesta tutkijat eivät ole päässeet yksimielisyyteen. Myöhempään tutkimukseen on vaikuttanut erityisesti käsitys Lokista tricksterinä. Celanderin ja Roothin etymologinen lähestymistapa on osaltaan vaikuttanut uudempaan tutkimukseen ja tulkintaan Lokista abstraktina hahmona, kuten myös de Vriesin kriittisyys moderneja lähteitä kohtaan. Dumézilin teorian vaikea soveltuvuus trickster-hahmojen tulkitaan on vähentänyt viittauksia häneen myöhemmässä Loki-tutkimuksessa eikä Olrikin maantieteellistä jaottelua näe enää uudemmassa tutkimuskirjallisuudessa. Jotkin teemat ovat jääneet vähemmälle huomiolle tutkimuksessa, kuten kenningien eli runollisten metaforien vähäinen liittyminen Lokiin sekä Lokin suhde jättiläisiin. Jatkotutkimuksen kannalta näiden teemojen syventäminen Lokin hahmon ymmärtämisessä olisi aiheellista. Lisäksi tutkimushistorian tuntemusta Lokin tutkimuksessa olisi mahdollista syventää vielä entisestään selvittämällä esimerkiksi kansallissosialistisen ilmapiirin vaikutusta mytologian tutkimuksessa.