Fibroblast nemosis in malignant progression of epithelial cells

Paracrine regulation between the components of the tumour microenvironment cancer cells, activated fibroblasts, immune and endothelial cells is under intense investigation. The signals between the different cell types are mediated by soluble factors, such as growth factors, proinflammatory cytokines and proteolytic enzymes. Nemosis is an experimental in vitro model of fibroblast activation, leading to increased production of such mediators. Nemotic activation of fibroblasts occurs as they are forced to cluster thereby forming a multicellular spheroid. The aim of the present studies was to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the nemotic response of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) and the role of nemosis in paracrine regulation between activated fibroblasts and benign and malignant epithelial cells. The results presented in this thesis demonstrate that the nemotic response of CAFs and normal fibroblasts differs, and inter-individual variations exist between fibroblast populations. In co-culture experiments, fibroblasts increased colony formation of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cells, and CAFs further augmented this, highlighting the tumour-evolving properties of CAFs. Furthermore, fibroblast monolayers in those co-cultures started to cluster spontaneously. This kind of spontaneous nemosis response might take place also in vivo, although more direct evidence of this still needs to be obtained. The HaCaT skin carcinoma progression model was used to study the effects of benign and malignant keratinocytes on fibroblast nemosis. Benign HaCaT cells inhibited fibroblast nemosis, observed as inhibition of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) induction in nemotic spheroids. In contrast, malignant HaCaTs further augmented the nemotic response by increasing expression of COX-2 and the growth factors hepatocyte growth factor / scatter factor (HGF/SF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), as well as causing a myofibroblastic differentiation of nemotic fibroblasts into fibroblasts resembling CAFs. On the other side of this reciprocal signalling, factors secreted into conditioned medium by the nemotic fibroblasts promoted proliferation and motility of the HaCaT cell lines. Notably, the nemotic fibroblast medium increased the expression of p63, a transcription factor linked to carcinogenesis, also in the highly metastatic HaCaT cells. These results emphasize the paracrine role of factors secreted by activated fibroblasts in driving tumour progression. We also investigated the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of the HaCaT clones in response to transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), which is a well-characterized inducer of EMT. TGF-β caused growth arrest and loss of epithelial cell junctions in the HaCaT derivatives, but mesenchymal markers were not induced, suggesting a partial, but not complete EMT response. Inflammation induced by COX-2 has been proposed to be a key mechanism in EMT of benign cells. Corroborating this notion, COX-2 was induced only in benign, not in malignant HaCaT derivatives. Furthermore, in cells in which TGF-β caused COX-2 induction, migration was clearly augmented. The concept of treating cancer is changing from targeting solely the cancer cells to targeting the whole microenvironment. The results of this work emphasise the role of activated fibroblasts in cancer progression and that CAFs should also be taken into consideration in the treatment of cancer. The results from these studies suggests that nemosis could be used as a diagnostic tool to distinguish in vitro activated fibroblasts from tumour stroma and also in studying the paracrine signalling that is mediated to other cell types via soluble factors.

Grammar and disciplinary culture : a corpus-based study

The present study provides a usage-based account of how three grammatical structures, declarative content clauses, interrogative content clause and as-predicative constructions, are used in academic research articles. These structures may be used in both knowledge claims and citations, and they often express evaluative meanings. Using the methodology of quantitative corpus linguistics, I investigate how the culture of the academic discipline influences the way in which these constructions are used in research articles. The study compares the rates of occurrence of these grammatical structures and investigates their co-occurrence patterns in articles representing four different disciplines (medicine, physics, law, and literary criticism). The analysis is based on a purpose-built 2-million-word corpus, which has been part-of-speech tagged. The analysis demonstrates that the use of these grammatical structures varies between disciplines, and further shows that the differences observed in the corpus data are linked with differences in the nature of knowledge and the patterns of enquiry. The constructions in focus tend to be more frequently used in the soft disciplines, law and literary criticism, where their co-occurrence patterns are also more varied. This reflects both the greater variety of topics discussed in these disciplines, and the higher frequency of references to statements made by other researchers. Knowledge-building in the soft fields normally requires a careful contextualisation of the arguments, giving rise to statements reporting earlier research employing the constructions in focus. In contrast, knowledgebuilding in the hard fields is typically a cumulative process, based on agreed-upon methods of analysis. This characteristic is reflected in the structure and contents of research reports, which offer fewer opportunities for using these constructions.

Beasts on Fields. Human-Wildlife Conflicts in Nature-Culture Borderlands

Human-wildlife conflicts are today an integral part of the rural development discourse. In this research, the main focus is on the spatial explanation which is not a very common approach in the reviewed literature. My research hypothesis is based on the assumption that human-wildlife conflicts occur when a wild animal crosses a perceived borderline between the nature and culture and enters into the realms of the other. The borderline between nature and culture marks a perceived division of spatial content in our senses of place. The animal subject that crosses this border becomes a subject out of place meaning that the animal is then spatially located in a space where it should not be or where it does not belong according to tradition, custom, rules, law, public opinion, prevailing discourse or some other criteria set by human beings. An appearance of a wild animal in a domesticated space brings an uncontrolled subject into that space where humans have previously commanded total control of all other natural elements. A wild animal out of place may also threaten the biosecurity of the place in question. I carried out a case study in the Liwale district in south-eastern Tanzania to test my hypothesis during June and July 2002. I also collected documents and carried out interviews in Dar es Salaam in 2003. I studied the human-wildlife conflicts in six rural villages, where a total of 183 persons participated in the village meetings. My research methods included semi-structured interviews, participatory mapping, questionnaire survey and Q- methodology. The rural communities in the Liwale district have a long-history of co-existing with wildlife and they still have traditional knowledge of wildlife management and hunting. Wildlife conservation through the establishment of game reserves during the colonial era has escalated human-wildlife conflicts in the Liwale district. This study shows that the villagers perceive some wild animals differently in their images of the African countryside than the district and regional level civil servants do. From the small scale subsistence farmers point of views, wild animals continue to challenge the separation of the wild (the forests) and the domestics spaces (the cultivated fields) by moving across the perceived borders in search of food and shelter. As a result, the farmers may loose their crops, livestock or even their own lives in the confrontations of wild animals. Human-wildlife conflicts in the Liwale district are manifold and cannot be explained simply on the basis of attitudes or perceived images of landscapes. However, the spatial explanation of these conflicts provides us some more understanding of why human-wildlife conflicts are so widely found across the world.