Metsän kiertoajan vaikutus hiilensidontaan ja metsänkasvatuksen kannattavuuteen

Cost-effective mitigation of climate change is essential for both climate and environmental policy. Forest rotation age is one of the silvicultural measures by which the forest carbon stocks can be influenced with in accordance with the Kyoto Protocol, Article 3.4. The purpose of this study is to evaluate how forest rotation age affects carbon sequestration and the profitability of forestry. The relation between the forest rotation period optimizing forest owners’ discounted net returns over time and rotations which are 10, 20 and 30 years longer than the optimal rotation is examined. In addition, the cost of lengthening the rotation period is studied as well as whether carbon sequestration revenues can improve the profitability of forestry. The data used in the study consist of 16 stands located in Southern Finland. The main tree species in these stands were Norway spruce and Scots pine. Forest simulation tool MOTTI was used in the analysis. The results indicate that by lengthening the rotation period forest carbon stocks increase. However, as the rotation period is lengthened by more than 10 years, as a result of the diminishing growth curve, the rate of carbon sequestration slows down. The average discounted cost of carbon sequestration varied between 2.4 – 14.1 €/tCO2. Carbon sequestration rates in spruce stands were higher and the costs lower than those obtained from pine stands. The absence of carbon trading schemes is an obstacle for the commercialization of forest carbon sinks. In the future, research should concentrate on analysing what kind of operational models of carbon trading could be feasible in Finland.

Scientific Journal Publishing – Yearly Volume and Open Access Availability

Introduction. We estimate the total yearly volume of peer-reviewed scientific journal articles published world-wide as well as the share of these articles available openly on the Web either directly or as copies in e-print repositories. Method. We rely on data from two commercial databases (ISI and Ulrich's Periodicals Directory) supplemented by sampling and Google searches. Analysis. A central issue is the finding that ISI-indexed journals publish far more articles per year (111) than non ISI-indexed journals (26), which means that the total figure we obtain is much lower than many earlier estimates. Our method of analysing the number of repository copies (green open access) differs from several earlier studies which have studied the number of copies in identified repositories, since we start from a random sample of articles and then test if copies can be found by a Web search engine. Results. We estimate that in 2006 the total number of articles published was approximately 1,350,000. Of this number 4.6% became immediately openly available and an additional 3.5% after an embargo period of, typically, one year. Furthermore, usable copies of 11.3% could be found in subject-specific or institutional repositories or on the home pages of the authors. Conclusions. We believe our results are the most reliable so far published and, therefore, should be useful in the on-going debate about Open Access among both academics and science policy makers. The method is replicable and also lends itself to longitudinal studies in the future.

Domännamnstvister och ond tro - En rättslig analys av UDRP, särskilt med tanke på begreppet ond tro i artikel 4.a.iii

Internets ökade betydelse gjorde att företagen började inse vilka problem som kan uppstå av att en webbsida med ett domännamn i form av deras varumärke olovligen handhas av en utomstående part. Konflikterna blev därför fler medan existerande tvistlösningsmekanismer ansågs dyra, tungrodda och ineffektiva. Ur detta behov föddes sedermera Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP). Detta internationella tvistlösningsförfarande skapades för att tillämpas på s.k. cybersquatting, dvs. situationer där domännamn, som inkräktar på andras varu- eller servicemärken, registreras i ond tro t.ex. för framtida försäljning. Jag granskar i denna avhandling huvudsakligen förutsättningarna för överföring eller upphävning av domännamnsregistreringar i enlighet med UDRP, varför jag fokuserar på artikel 4.a och då i synnerhet på innebörden av begreppet ”registrering och användning i ond tro”. Arbetet bygger huvudsakligen på en analys av de avgöranden som fattats inom ramen för UDRP. Syftet är att genom en systematisk undersökning av tillämpningen av begreppet ond tro beskriva och utvärdera rättstillämpningen inom UDRP. De granskade avgörandena är 396 st. till antalet och har meddelats under tidsperioden 14.1.2000-15.8.2001.