Väkivalta, antisemitismi ja konflikti Mel Gibsonin elokuvassa The Passion of The Christ

Tutkielman tarkoituksena on tutkia Mel Gibsonin elokuvaa The Passion of the Christ. Tarkastelussa mukana on myös Gibsonin muu tuotanto. Tutkielma edustaa poikkitieteellistä lähestymistapaa käyttäen eksegetiikan apuvälineitä kuten lähdekritiikkiä, mutta myös elokuvatutkimuksen välineitä. Tutkimuskysymyksiä nousee lähinnä kaksi, joista seuraa kolmas kysymys: 1. Onko elokuva juutalaisvastainen? Tarkastelen lähdekritiikin avulla mitä evankeliumeja Gibson on käyttänyt elokuvassaan. Mitä muita lähteitä hän on käyttänyt? Mikä on Gibsonin omaa ilmaisua? 2. Miksi elokuva on väkivaltainen? Mitä väkivalta palvelee elokuvassa? 3. Millainen on elokuvamaailman konflikti? Pohdin elokuvamaailman sisälle rakennettua konfliktia, mutta viittaan sillä myös konfliktiin, jonka elokuva itsessään synnytti. Kysymysten ratkaisu vaatii elokuvassa käytettyjen lähteiden tutkimista, mutta myös kysymysten tarkastelua osana laajempaa kokonaisuutta, jossa on mukana koko Gibsonin elokuvatuotanto. On myös selvää, ettei Gibson ole yhtä kuin hänen elokuvansa, mutta toisaalta hänen elokuviaan ei voi tarkastella irrotettuna ohjaajasta itsestään. Ensimmäisessä luvussa tarkastelen elokuvaa ilmiönä ja elokuvasta käytyä ennakkokeskustelua. Luvussa kaksi tarkastelen Gibsonin taustaa. Millaisista lähtökohdista Gibson lähti tekemään elokuvaa? Luvussa kolme esittelen käsikirjoituksesta alkavan elokuvan yleisen tuotantoprosessin. Tutkielman päälähteenä olen käyttänyt Brentanon kirjaa The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ. Kirja pohjautuu 1800-luvulla eläneen katolisen nunnan, Anne Catherine Emmerichin näkyihin. Luvussa neljä tarkastelen Gibsonin muuta tuotantoa, ja tuon keskusteluun mukaan Scorsesen elokuvan Jeesuksesta. Gibsonin muu tuotanto on jäänyt tutkijoilta liian vähälle huomiolle. Elokuva The Passion of the Christ on nähtävä osana Gibsonin muuta tuotantoa. Näin ollen elokuvaa The Passion of the Christ voidaan ymmärtää paremmin. Luvussa viisi käyn elokuvan The Passion of the Christ läpi kappale kerrallaan tutkimalla, mitä lähteitä Gibson on käyttänyt elokuvassaan. Mitä hän on ottanut evankeliumeista, mitä Emmerichiltä ja mikä on hänen omaa ilmaisuaan? Luvussa kuusi käyn läpi elokuvan vastaanottoa niin raamatuntutkijoiden kuin suuren yleisön parissa. Tutkielmassa todetaan, ettei Gibson ole antisemitisti, vaan ksenofobinen rasisti. Hänen elokuvansa ovat ksenofobisesti rasistisia. Gibsonin kaikista elokuvista on löydettävissä itseään toistavia piirteitä, joissa esiintyy muukalaiskammoa ja väkivaltaa. Gibsonin nimittäminen antisemitistiksi ei tekisi Gibsonille oikeutta. Juutalaiset ovat vain osa laajempaa kokonaisuutta. Väkivalta palvelee kaikissa elokuvissa uuden, Jumalan valtakunnan syntymistä. Konflikti syntyy uuden ja vanhan valtakunnan kansalaisten välillä. Uhrien veren kautta syntyy Jumalan valtakunta. Johtopäätöksillä on merkitystä niin Gibsonin kuin hänen elokuviensa ymmärtämiselle. Elokuvan The Passion of the Christ tulevissa tutkimuksissa on otettava huomioon, ei vain Gibsonin tausta ja lähteet, vaan myös Gibsonin muu elokuvatuotanto.

The Church and Its Boundaries : A Study of the Special Commission on Orthodox Participation in the WCC

The relationship between the Orthodox Churches and the World Council of Churches (WCC) became a crisis just before the 8th Assembly of the WCC in Harare, Zimbabwe in 1998. The Special Commission on Orthodox Participation in the WCC (SC), inaugurated in Harare, worked during the period 1999 2002 to solve the crisis and to secure the Orthodox participation in the WCC. The purpose of this study is: 1) to clarify the theological motives for the inauguration of the SC and the theological argumentation of the Orthodox criticism; 2) to write a reliable history and analysis of the SC; 3) to outline the theological argumentation, which structures the debate, and 4) to investigate the ecclesiological questions that arise from the SC material. The study spans the years 1998 to 2006, from the WCC Harare Assembly to the Porto Alegre Assembly. Hence, the initiation and immediate reception of the Special Commission are included in the study. The sources of this study are all the material produced by and for the SC. The method employed is systematic analysis. The focus of the study is on theological argumentation; the historical context and political motives that played a part in the Orthodox-WCC relations are not discussed in detail. The study shows how the initial, specific and individual Orthodox concerns developed into a profound ecclesiological discussion and also led to concrete changes in WCC practices, the best known of which is the change to decision-making by consensus. The Final Report of the SC contains five main themes, namely, ecclesiology, decision-making, worship/common prayer, membership and representation, and social and ethical issues. The main achievement of the SC was that it secured the Orthodox membership in the WCC. The ecclesiological conclusions made in the Final Report are twofold. On the one hand, it confirms that the very act of belonging to the WCC means the commitment to discuss the relationship between a church and churches. The SC recommended that baptism should be added as a criterion for membership in the WCC, and the member churches should continue to work towards the mutual recognition of each other s baptism. These elements strengthen the ecclesiological character of the WCC. On the other hand, when the Final Report discusses common prayer, the ecclesiological conclusions are much more cautious, and the ecclesiological neutrality of the WCC is emphasized several times. The SC repeatedly emphasized that the WCC is a fellowship of churches. The concept of koinonia, which has otherwise been important in recent ecclesiological questions, was not much applied by the SC. The comparison of the results of the SC to parallel ecclesiological documents of the WCC (Nature and Mission of the Church, Called to Be the One Church) shows that they all acknowledge the different ecclesiological starting points of the member churches, and, following that, a variety of legitimate views on the relation of the Church to the churches. Despite the change from preserving the koinonia to promises of eschatological koinonia, all the documents affirm that the goal of the ecumenical movement is still full, visible unity.

Changing Paradigms in Biblical Criticism : 2 Kings 22:1 23:30 in the Flux of Discourses

The subject and methodology of biblical scholarship has expanded immense-ly during the last few decades. The traditional text-, literary-, source- and form-critical approaches, labeled historical-critical scholarship , have faced the challenge of social sciences. Various new literary, synchronic readings, sometimes characterized with the vague term postmodernism, have in turn challenged historicalcritical, and social-scientific approaches. Widened limits and diverging methodologies have caused a sense of crisis in biblical criticism. This metatheoretical thesis attempts to bridge the gap between philosophical discussion about the basis of biblical criticism and practical academic biblical scholarship. The study attempts to trace those epistemological changes that have produced the wealth of methods and results within biblical criticism. The account of the cult reform of King Josiah of Judah as reported in 2 Kings 22:1 23:30 serves as the case study because of its importance for critical study of the Hebrew Bible. Various scholarly approaches embracing 2 Kings 22:1 23:30 are experimentally arranged around four methodological positions: text, author, reader, and context. The heuristic model is a tentative application of Oliver Jahraus s model of four paradigms in literary theory. The study argues for six theses: 1) Our knowledge of the world is con-structed, fallible and theory-laden. 2) Methodological plurality is the neces-sary result of changes in epistemology and culture in general. 3) Oliver Jahraus s four methodological positions in regard to literature are also an applicable model within biblical criticism to comprehend the methodological plurality embracing the study of the Hebrew Bible. 4) Underlying the methodological discourse embracing biblical criticism is the epistemological ten-sion between the natural sciences and the humanities. 5) Biblical scholars should reconsider and analyze in detail concepts such as author and editor to overcome the dichotomy between the Göttingen and Cross schools. 6) To say something about the historicity of 2 Kings 22:1 23:30 one must bring together disparate elements from various disciplines and, finally, admit that though it may be possible to draw some permanent results, our conclusions often remain provisional.

The Home of Hearing : George Lindbeck's understanding of community

The aim of this thesis was to examine the understanding of community in George Lindbeck s The Nature of Doctrine. Intrinsic to this question was also examining how Lindbeck understands the relation between the text and the world which both meet in a Christian community. Thirdly this study also aimed at understanding what the persuasiveness of this understanding depends on. The method applied for this task was systematic analysis. The study was conducted by first providing an orientation into the nontheological substance of the ND which was assumed useful with respect to the aim of this study. The study then went on to explore Lindbeck in his own context of postliberal theology in order to see how the ND was received. It also attempted to provide a picture of how the ND relates to Lindbeck as a theologian. The third chapter was a descriptive analysis into the cultural-linguistic perspective, which is understood as being directly proportional to his understanding of community. The fourth chapter was an analysis into how the cultural-linguistic perspective sees the relation between the text and the world. When religion is understood from a cultural-linguistic perspective, it presents itself as a cultural-linguistic entity, which Lindbeck understands as a comprehensive interpretive scheme which structures human experience and understanding of oneself and the world in which one lives. When one exists in this entity, it is the entity which shapes the subjectivities of all those who are at home in this entity which makes participation in the life of a cultural linguistic entity a condition for understanding it. Religion is above all an external word that moulds and shapes our religious existence and experience. Understanding faith then as coming from hearing, is something that correlates with the cultural-linguistic depiction of reality. Religion informs us of a religious reality, it does not originate in any way from ourselves. This externality linked to the axiomatic nature of religion is also something that distinguishes Lindbeck sharply from liberalist tendencies, which understand religion as ultimately expressing the prereflective depths of the inner self. Language is the central analogy to understanding the medium in which one moves when inhabiting a cultural-linguistic system because language is the transmitting medium in which the cultural-linguistic system is embodied. The realism entailed in Lindbeck s understanding of a community is that we are fundamentally on the receiving end when it comes to our identities whether cultural or religious. We always witness to something. Its persuasiveness rests on the fact that we never exist in an unpersuaded reality. The language of Christ is a self-sustaining and irreducible cultural-linguistic entity, which is ontologically founded upon Christ. It transmits the reality of a new being. The basic relation to the world for a Christian is that of witnessing salvation in Christ: witnessing Christ as the home of hearing the message of salvation, which is the God-willed way. Following this logic, the relation of the world and the text is one of relating to the world from the text, i.e. In Christ through the word (text) for the world, because it assumes it s logic from the way Christ ontologically relates to us.

The Reception of the Maccabean Martyrs : Their Historiographical and Paradigmatic Functions in Antique and Late-antique Jewish and Christian Sources

The study attempts a reception-historical analysis of the Maccabean martyrs. The concept of reception has fundamentally to do with the re-use and interpretation of a text within new texts. In a religious tradition, certain elements become re-circulated and thus their reception may reflect the development of that particular tradition. The Maccabean martyrs first appear in 2 Maccabees. In my study, it is the Maccabean martyr figures who count as the received text; the focus is shifted from the interrelations between texts onto how the figures have been exploited in early Christian and Rabbinic sources. I have divided my sources into two categories and my analysis is in two parts. First, I analyze the reception of the Maccabean martyrs within Jewish and Christian historiographical sources, focusing on the role given to them in the depictions of the Maccabean Revolt (Chapter 3). I conclude that, within Jewish historiography, the martyrs are given roles, which vary between ultimate efficacy and marginal position with regard to making a historical difference. In Christian historiographical sources, the martyrs role grows in importance by time: however, it is not before a Christian cult of the Maccabean martyrs has been established, that the Christian historiographies consider them historically effective. After the first part, I move on to analyze the reception in sources, which make use of the Maccabean martyrs as paradigmatic figures (Chapter 4). I have suggested that the martyrs are paradigmatic in the context of martyrdom, persecution and destruction, on one hand, and in a homiletic context, inspiring religious celebration, on the other. I conclude that, as the figures are considered pre-Christian and biblical martyrs, they function well in terms of Christian martyrdom and have contributed to the development of its ideals. Furthermore, the presentation of the martyr figures in Rabbinic sources demonstrates how the notion of Jewish martyrdom arises from experiences of destruction and despair, not so much from heroic confession of faith in the face of persecution. Before the emergence of a Christian cult of the Maccabean martyrs, their identity is derived namely from their biblical position. Later on, in the homiletic context, their Jewish identity is debated and sometimes reconstructed as fundamentally Christian , despite of their Jewish origins. Similar debate about their identity is not found in the Rabbinic versions of their martyrdom and nothing there indicates a mutual debate between early Christians and Jews. A thematic comparison shows that the Rabbinic and Christian cases of reception are non-reliant on each other but also that they link to one another. Especially the scriptural connections, often made to the Maccabean mother, reveal the similarities. The results of the analyses confirm that the early history of Christianity and Rabbinic Judaism share, at least partly, the same religious environment and intertwining traditions, not only during the first century or two but until Late Antiquity and beyond. More likely, the reception of the Maccabean martyrs demonstrates that these religious traditions never ceased to influence one another.