1 resultado para choices
em eScholarship Repository - University of California
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (4)
- Aberdeen University (3)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (4)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Aquatic Commons (9)
- Archive of European Integration (20)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (17)
- Aston University Research Archive (10)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (3)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (58)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (13)
- Boston University Digital Common (12)
- Brock University, Canada (3)
- CaltechTHESIS (8)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (27)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (20)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (10)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (4)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (12)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (3)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (9)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (5)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (5)
- Duke University (18)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (13)
- eScholarship Repository - University of California (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (12)
- Harvard University (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (71)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (31)
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (3)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (7)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (38)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (377)
- Repositorio de la Universidad del Pacífico - PERU (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (4)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (2)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (2)
- University of Michigan (20)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (12)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
Four Ss were run in a visual span of apprehension experiment to determine whether second choices made following incorrect first responses are at the chance level, as implied by various high threshold models proposed for this situation. The relationships between response biases on first and second choices, and between first choice biases on trials with two or three possible responses, were also examined in terms of Luce's (1959) choice theory. The results were: (a) second choice performance in this task appears to be determined by response bias alone, i.e., second choices were at the chance level; (b)first and second choice response biases were not related according to Luce's choice axiom; and (c) the choice axiom predicted with reasonable accuracy the relationships between first choice response biases corresponding to trials with different numbers of possible response alternatives. © 1967 Psychonomic Society, Inc.