O conceito de realeza de Temístio e Amiano Marcelino : o caso do imperador Valentiniano I

Abstract: In the context of Late Antiquity, we observe the ideals of Royalty of two authors who shared the political events between the governments of Constantius II to Theodosius (337-395 AD), namely: the philosopher Themistius (317-388 AD) with his political speeches; and the military Ammianus Marcellinus (325 / 330-395 AD) with his work Res Gestae. During our study, we will seek to observe the characteristics of each author, and converge their life experiences to meet the convergent and divergent points of its concepts around the Imperial responsibilities. In the meantime, we emphasize the interactions between Romans and barbarians, very noticeable at that time; and how this process of interaction of cultures has influenced the thinking of the late-ancient writers studied here. Observing how a philosopher and a military developed such ideals in relation to the ruler: Valentinian I (364-375 AD), for that we made a more specific analysis of VI Speech of Themistius - the Brotherly Love or About humanity - and the XVI - XXX Books of Ammianus Marcellinus. Thus, in a time of great cultural socio-political effervescence, two non-Christian writers have written their work, in order to re-member your audience the importance of the virtues and both based on examples from the classical tradition.

Un caso de auto-reescritura : El astrólogo fingido de Calderón

Resumen: La pulcra edición de la Segunda parte de comedias de Pedro Calderón de la Barca por Santiago Fernández Mosquera (Biblioteca Castro, 2007) y la reciente tesis de Fernando Rodríguez-Gallego (2009) sobre las dos versiones de El astrólogo fingido (Zaragoza, 1632 y Madrid, 1637) obligan hoy a una revisión de uno de los casos, tan frecuentes en la producción del dramaturgo madrileño, de reescritura —con miras esta vez a la publicación impresa— de una de sus obras. El examen se centrará, más allá de consideraciones formales y estéticas, en la valoración del alcance ético de las profundas transformaciones sufridas por el personaje del primer protagonista, el falso astrólogo, don Diego de Luna, así como en el análisis de las dos versiones del desenlace.