Computational modeling and psychophysics in low- and mid-level vision

This thesis addresses a series of topics related to the question of how people find the foreground objects from complex scenes. With both computer vision modeling, as well as psychophysical analyses, we explore the computational principles for low- and mid-level vision.

We first explore the computational methods of generating saliency maps from images and image sequences. We propose an extremely fast algorithm called Image Signature that detects the locations in the image that attract human eye gazes. With a series of experimental validations based on human behavioral data collected from various psychophysical experiments, we conclude that the Image Signature and its spatial-temporal extension, the Phase Discrepancy, are among the most accurate algorithms for saliency detection under various conditions.

In the second part, we bridge the gap between fixation prediction and salient object segmentation with two efforts. First, we propose a new dataset that contains both fixation and object segmentation information. By simultaneously presenting the two types of human data in the same dataset, we are able to analyze their intrinsic connection, as well as understanding the drawbacks of today’s “standard” but inappropriately labeled salient object segmentation dataset. Second, we also propose an algorithm of salient object segmentation. Based on our novel discoveries on the connections of fixation data and salient object segmentation data, our model significantly outperforms all existing models on all 3 datasets with large margins.

In the third part of the thesis, we discuss topics around the human factors of boundary analysis. Closely related to salient object segmentation, boundary analysis focuses on delimiting the local contours of an object. We identify the potential pitfalls of algorithm evaluation for the problem of boundary detection. Our analysis indicates that today’s popular boundary detection datasets contain significant level of noise, which may severely influence the benchmarking results. To give further insights on the labeling process, we propose a model to characterize the principles of the human factors during the labeling process.

The analyses reported in this thesis offer new perspectives to a series of interrelating issues in low- and mid-level vision. It gives warning signs to some of today’s “standard” procedures, while proposing new directions to encourage future research.

Characterization of the human SCF ubiquitin ligases - structure, function, and regulation

The SCF ubiquitin ligase complex of budding yeast triggers DNA replication by cata lyzi ng ubiquitination of the S phase CDK inhibitor SIC1. SCF is composed of several evolutionarily conserved proteins, including ySKP1, CDC53 (Cullin), and the F-box protein CDC4. We isolated hSKP1 in a two-hybrid screen with hCUL1, the human homologue of CDC53. We showed that hCUL1 associates with hSKP1 in vivo and directly interacts with hSKP1 and the human F-box protein SKP2 in vitro, forming an SCF-Iike particle. Moreover, hCUL1 complements the growth defect of yeast CDC53^(ts) mutants, associates with ubiquitination-promoting activity in human cell extracts, and can assemble into functional, chimeric ubiquitin ligase complexes with yeast SCF components. These data demonstrated that hCUL1 functions as part of an SCF ubiquitin ligase complex in human cells. However, purified human SCF complexes consisting of CUL1, SKP1, and SKP2 are inactive in vitro, suggesting that additional factors are required.

Subsequently, mammalian SCF ubiquitin ligases were shown to regulate various physiological processes by targeting important cellular regulators, like lĸBα, β-catenin, and p27, for ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis by the 26S proteasome. Little, however, is known about the regulation of various SCF complexes. By using sequential immunoaffinity purification and mass spectrometry, we identified proteins that interact with human SCF components SKP2 and CUL1 in vivo. Among them we identified two additional SCF subunits: HRT1, present in all SCF complexes, and CKS1, that binds to SKP2 and is likely to be a subunit of SCF5^(SKP2) complexes. Subsequent work by others demonstrated that these proteins are essential for SCF activity. We also discovered that COP9 Signalosome (CSN), previously described in plants as a suppressor of photomorphogenesis, associates with CUL1 and other SCF subunits in vivo. This interaction is evolutionarily conserved and is also observed with other Cullins, suggesting that all Cullin based ubiquitin ligases are regulated by CSN. CSN regulates Cullin Neddylation presumably through CSNS/JAB1, a stochiometric Signalosome subunit and a putative deneddylating enzyme. This work sheds light onto an intricate connection that exists between signal transduction pathways and protein degradation machinery inside the cell and sets stage for gaining further insights into regulation of protein degradation.