The electric field of a weakly electric fish

Freshwater fish of the genus Apteronotus (family Gymnotidae) generate a weak, high frequency electric field (< 100 mV/cm, 0.5-10 kHz) which permeates their local environment. These nocturnal fish are acutely sensitive to perturbations in their electric field caused by other electric fish, and nearby objects whose impedance is different from the surrounding water. This thesis presents high temporal and spatial resolution maps of the electric potential and field on and near Apteronotus. The fish's electric field is a complicated and highly stable function of space and time. Its characteristics, such as spectral composition, timing, and rate of attenuation, are examined in terms of physical constraints, and their possible functional roles in electroreception.

Temporal jitter of the periodic field is less than 1 µsec. However, electrocyte activity is not globally synchronous along the fish 's electric organ. The propagation of electrocyte activation down the fish's body produces a rotation of the electric field vector in the caudal part of the fish. This may assist the fish in identifying nonsymmetrical objects, and could also confuse electrosensory predators that try to locate Apteronotus by following its fieldlines. The propagation also results in a complex spatiotemporal pattern of the EOD potential near the fish. Visualizing the potential on the same and different fish over timescales of several months suggests that it is stable and could serve as a unique signature for individual fish.

Measurements of the electric field were used to calculate the effects of simple objects on the fish's electric field. The shape of the perturbation or "electric image" on the fish's skin is relatively independent of a simple object's size, conductivity, and rostrocaudal location, and therefore could unambiguously determine object distance. The range of electrolocation may depend on both the size of objects and their rostrocaudal location. Only objects with very large dielectric constants cause appreciable phase shifts, and these are strongly dependent on the water conductivity.

The Regulation of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms: The Role of Melatonin and Adenosine in Zebrafish

Sleep is a highly conserved behavioral state whose regulation is still unclear. In this thesis I initially briefly introduce the known sleep circuitry and regulation in vertebrates, and why zebrafish is seen as a good model to study sleep-regulation. I describe the existing two-process model of sleep regulation, which posits that the two processes C (circadian) and S (homeostatic) control timing of sleep-wake behavior. I then study the role melatonin plays in the circadian regulation of sleep using zebrafish. Firstly, we find that the absence of melatonin results in a reduction of sleep at night, establishing that endogenous melatonin is required for sleep at night. Secondly, melatonin mutants show a reduction in sleep in animals with no functional behavioral rhythms suggesting that melatonin does not require intact circadian rhythms for its effect on sleep. Thirdly, melatonin mutants do not exhibit any changes in circadian rhythms, suggesting that the circadian clock does not require melatonin for its function. Fourthly, we find that in the absence of melatonin, there is no rhythmic expression of sleep, suggesting that melatonin is the output molecule of process C. Lastly, we describe a connection between adenosine signaling (output molecules of process S), and melatonin. Following this we proceed to study the role adenosine signaling plays in sleep-wake behavior. We find that firstly, adenosine receptor A1 and A2 are involved in sleep- wake behavior in zebrafish, based on agonist/antagonist behavioral results. Secondly, we find that several brain regions such as PACAP cells in the rostral midbrain, GABAergic cells in the forebrain and hindbrain, Dopamine and serotonin cells in the caudal hypothalamus and sox2 cells lining the hindbrain ventricle are activated in response to the A1 antagonist and VMAT positive cells are activated in response to the A2A agonist, suggesting these areas are involved in adenosine signaling in zebrafish. Thirdly, we find that knocking out the zebrafish adenosine receptors has no effect on sleep architecture. Lastly, we find that while the A1 agonist phenotype requires the zfAdora1a receptor, the antagonist and the A2A agonist behavioral phenotypes are not mediated by the zfAdora1a, zfAdora1b and zfAdoraA2Aa, zfAdora2Ab receptors respectively.